Fix grammar in currency-exchange hint #3529
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This is a tiny thing, and it probably wouldn't confuse people who are actually doing the exercise. I came across it because I was doing a full audit of instances where we say 'amount of ...' since there were several instances where it should have been 'number of ...'. At first I thought this was supposed to be 'number of changes', but then in the context of the exercise it turns out that it was a different problem entirely :)
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This is a tiny thing, and it probably wouldn't confuse people who are
actually doing the exercise.
I came across it because I was doing a full audit of instances where
we say 'amount of ...' since there were several instances where it
should have been 'number of ...'.
At first I thought this was supposed to be 'number of changes', but
then in the context of the exercise it turns out that it was a
different problem entirely :)