doc: top-level explanation of why this toolchain #84
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Could there be a short description that is specific to gcc-toolchain at the top before going into why someone would want things to be hermetic. Could there also be a link to examples or a snippet of what to add to a WORKSPACE file to use the toolchain. I like the description of why you would want a toolchain and the tradeoffs involved 👍 |
Yes - I'll reduce the scope of this and move to a blog post for the extended explanation.
In another PR. This PR is not the full docs this repository needs. |
Signed-off-by: Thulio Ferraz Assis <3149049+f0rmiga@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
No description provided.