Skip to content

Issues: fNIRS/snirf

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

9 Open 63 Closed
9 Open 63 Closed
Author
Filter by author
Loading
Label
Filter by label
Loading
Use alt + click/return to exclude labels
or ⇧ + click/return for logical OR
Projects
Filter by project
Loading
Milestones
Filter by milestone
Loading
Assignee
Filter by who’s assigned
Sort
Sort by
Newest Oldest Most commented Least commented Recently updated Least recently updated Best match
Most reactions
👍 👎 😄 🎉 😕 ❤️ 🚀 👀

Issues list

[Suggestion] Increased compatability for mutliple AUX data channels to be stored in a single AUX block enhancement New feature or request
#158 opened Sep 19, 2024 by DamianNeurode
3
[Suggestion] Make detector- and sourceindex to array (needed for SRS & StO2) enhancement New feature or request
#157 opened Sep 16, 2024 by Horschig
Create a comprehensive set of example data enhancement New feature or request
#156 opened Sep 13, 2024 by rob-luke
3
What happens if both /nirs(i)/data(j)/measurementLists and /nirs(i)/data(j)/measurementList are both present help wanted Extra attention is needed
#155 opened Sep 13, 2024 by rob-luke
5
Ensure validator supports St02 change from #145
#146 opened May 29, 2024 by rob-luke
@rob-luke @sreekanthkura7
1
Multiplex configuration description for enahnced data processing
#141 opened Apr 19, 2024 by samuelpowell
2
Default value for not used entries
#119 opened Jul 11, 2022 by MichaelUM
@emiddell
6
/nirs(i)/stim(j)/data does not use TimeUnit breaking A change that would break backwards compatibility with previous releases of the specification v2.0 Things to be considered for version 2
#111 opened Apr 27, 2022 by rob-luke
2
Consider removing support for multiple /nirs{i} blocks: for many applications, a SNIRF file should only contain one acquisition from a single subject wontfix This will not be worked on
#88 opened Sep 29, 2021 by sstucker
@rob-luke
11
ProTip! Adding no:label will show everything without a label.