You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
@phismith
According to [041-002] the temporal argument may be any temporal region, at least it does not exclude any time intervals. However, I don't believe it makes sense to talk about a spatial region in which an independent continuant is exactly located if you consider time intervals during which the independent continuant moves. Maybe this is supposed to be a 0 dimensional temporal region?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
@phismithhttps://github.com/phismith
According to [041-002] the temporal argument may be any temporal region,
at least it does not exclude any time intervals. However, I don't believe
it makes sense to talk about a spatial region in which an independent
continuant is exactly located if you consider time intervals during which
the independent continuant moves. Maybe this is supposed to be a 0
dimensional temporal region?
—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub #61.
@phismith
According to [041-002] the temporal argument may be any temporal region, at least it does not exclude any time intervals. However, I don't believe it makes sense to talk about a spatial region in which an independent continuant is exactly located if you consider time intervals during which the independent continuant moves. Maybe this is supposed to be a 0 dimensional temporal region?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: