-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 304
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Prevent dotnet template engine to parse Paket.Restore.targets #1069
Conversation
Sorry, I don't understand exactly why this change is needed, could you explain more? I usually use the template as a normal project to test everything works before publishing a new version, so I'm afraid I or another contributor at one point will run |
This is a workaround against dotnet template engine bug. Nothing to do with
paket
Am 15.07.2017 12:07 nachm. schrieb "Alfonso Garcia-Caro" <
notifications@github.com>:
… Sorry, I don't understand exactly why this change is needed, could you
explain more? I usually use the template as a normal project to test
everything works before publishing a new version, so I'm afraid I or
another contributor at one point will run paket update and forget about
this. Also, if this is something necessary for Paket, shouldn't it be added
directly to Paket targets as it will affect all templates using Paket?
—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#1069 (comment)>,
or mute the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AADgNEZ0XAa5X8DXmvrU9p0F6t0K876Fks5sOI92gaJpZM4OYurd>
.
|
@forki I see, but I think my points above are still valid. Sorry, but I'm not crazy supporting a non-stable version of dotnet SDK by adding patches and maintenance chores... specially not in Summer 😉 😎 🌞 🌻 I'd rather change the README to say dotnet SDK 2.0 is not supported yet or add the recommendation to run |
Just take a look at recent fable gitter. Everyone runs into this. Everyone. So we need to do something... |
These are the scenarios I foresee:
Because of this, I would prefer an alternative solution:
|
Yes adding it to paket itself is probably best. |
@alfonsogarciacaro Careful when you run
paket.exe update/install
perhaps this will override this changes.@forki could probably confirm/infirm the behaviour of paket on this file. :)