add fedora-java8 image (#160) #182
Conversation
|
@gunnarmorling (and @ctron) let's see if @rhuss would be OK to merge this ... ... the idea being, obviously, to then follow-up with a fedora-java11 next. |
|
One question: Why do you want to have a Java 8 Fedora image to maintain when we have a CentOS one ? I understand the (temporary) need for Fedora for a Java 11 but, shouldn't it be fine to have only a Java 11 image for Fedora ? As mentioned I relaly would like this only to have as a temporary solution, switching back to centos for Java 11 when available. The less images to maintain the better. |
|
@rhuss sure, agreed (see also #193 BTW). What happened here is simply that my dev workflow was to first see if there was any problem to create a Fedora instead of a CentOS based image, first for Java 8 (it was no problem at all), and perhaps illustrate to you / anyone else watching that this works, and that I then tackled the Java 11 image. In hind-sight I would tend to agree that we probably don't really need this Fedora based Java 8 image, and will only confuse people to have more choices... so why don't I abandon this - and rework #189 to only introduce |
related to #160 Java 11 support
just because there is no Java 11 in CentOS just yet, so let's start with a Fedora based image