Upgrade jnr-unixsocket version to 0.21

[pvaduva]

jnr-unixsocket version 0.20 added arm64 support
si in otder to have the plugin working on arm64
we will need that version

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #1089 into master will decrease coverage by 0.24%.
The diff coverage is 0%.

@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##             master    #1089      +/-   ##
============================================
- Coverage     51.97%   51.73%   -0.25%     
+ Complexity     1457     1441      -16     
============================================
  Files           150      150              
  Lines          7821     7788      -33     
  Branches       1165     1158       -7     
============================================
- Hits           4065     4029      -36     
- Misses         3361     3363       +2     
- Partials        395      396       +1

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ	Complexity Δ
...abric8/maven/docker/access/hc/unix/UnixSocket.java	0% <0%> (ø)	0 <0> (ø)	⬇️
...g/handler/compose/DockerComposeServiceWrapper.java	58.76% <0%> (-2.82%)	55% <0%> (-7%)
...n/java/io/fabric8/maven/docker/util/ImageName.java	91.35% <0%> (-1.15%)	35% <0%> (ø)
...ig/handler/compose/DockerComposeConfigHandler.java	71.73% <0%> (-0.9%)	17% <0%> (ø)
...va/io/fabric8/maven/docker/service/RunService.java	51.07% <0%> (-0.64%)	25% <0%> (ø)
...ic8/maven/docker/config/RunImageConfiguration.java	90.27% <0%> (-0.58%)	46% <0%> (-3%)
...bric8/maven/docker/access/ContainerHostConfig.java	84.53% <0%> (-0.47%)	36% <0%> (-3%)
...config/handler/property/PropertyConfigHandler.java	73.87% <0%> (-0.35%)	112% <0%> (-3%)
...aven/docker/config/handler/property/ConfigKey.java	100% <0%> (ø)	10% <0%> (ø)	⬇️
...o/fabric8/maven/docker/model/ContainerDetails.java	65.82% <0%> (ø)	20% <0%> (ø)	⬇️
... and 4 more

[rhuss]

@pvaduva Thanks for the PR ! I have to check it because the last time I tried to update to 0.19 it was a mess breaking all sort of things.

But if it works ok for and maybe also some other issues we had with the jnr-unixsocket which mixed up parallel connections, then we will merge it for sure.

I hope I can do some experiments over the weekend.

[pvaduva]

@pvaduva Thanks for the PR ! I have to check it because the last time I tried to update to 0.19 it was a mess breaking all sort of things.

But if it works ok for and maybe also some other issues we had with the jnr-unixsocket which mixed up parallel connections, then we will merge it for sure.

I hope I can do some experiments over the weekend.

Thanks for looking to it, Please tell me if there's anything I can do to help.
If it does not work with the new version is there any way we can integrate
arm64 support ? (Adding them to a fork from jnr-unixsocket 0.12 for example)

Best Regards.

[pvaduva]

Hi Roland, Did you had time to check the upgrade of jnr-unixsocket ? Thanks, Paul Thanks for the PR ! I have to check it because the last time I tried to update to 0.19 it was a mess breaking all sort of things. But if it works ok for and maybe also some other issues we had with the jnr-unixsocket which mixed up parallel connections, then we will merge it for sure. I hope I can do some experiments over the weekend.

[gbloisi]

In the meanwhile a 0.21 version has been released, just come to this because I'm facing issue #552 too.

[rhuss]

Ok, lets try it. I did some brief sanity checks and it looks good so far. Hopefully the issues we had the Unix socker are resolved.

I'm planning a release later this week.