Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

docker networks instead of links #321

Closed
ppaland opened this issue Nov 8, 2015 · 5 comments
Closed

docker networks instead of links #321

ppaland opened this issue Nov 8, 2015 · 5 comments

Comments

@ppaland
Copy link

ppaland commented Nov 8, 2015

docker 1.9 introduces the new docker networking and at the same time discourages docker links:

https://blog.docker.com/2015/11/docker-multi-host-networking-ga/
https://docs.docker.com/engine/userguide/networking/default_network/dockerlinks/

Do you have plans to support the feature? It would be interesting because it easily allows two-way-communication.

@jgangemi
Copy link
Collaborator

yes, i'm sure at some point it will be added. pull requests are always welcome.

@rhuss
Copy link
Collaborator

rhuss commented Dec 1, 2015

Indeed we want to add new features introduced with Docker 1.9, although not quite clear how to do this for docker network yet.

The 0.14.x series is dedicated for adding new Docker 1.9 features. We will also have to think about how to handle backwards compatibility.

@rhuss rhuss added the feature label Dec 1, 2015
@rhuss rhuss added this to the 0.14.0 milestone Dec 1, 2015
@rhuss rhuss mentioned this issue Feb 12, 2016
@rhuss
Copy link
Collaborator

rhuss commented Feb 12, 2016

Network links are now supported for 0.14.0 with the new <net> configuration option. The network specified must exist already, though.

Might be a good idea to create a network on the fly if requested and not existant ?

@rhuss rhuss added the fixed label Feb 12, 2016
@ppaland
Copy link
Author

ppaland commented Feb 20, 2016

Would be perfect if PropertyConfigHandler was also extended for this feature.

@rhuss
Copy link
Collaborator

rhuss commented Feb 22, 2016

good point, added this, too.

@rhuss rhuss closed this as completed Feb 25, 2016
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants