You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The syntax in the official website doesn't allow JSXFragment as JSXChild.
It has been added in the master branch by #97, but it hasn't been synced to the website.
* Migrate to ecmarkup
This is the first step to revamp this repo: [ecmarkup](https://github.com/tc39/ecmarkup)
is TC39's official tool for specifying syntax and semantics for ECMAScript.
I proposed that we should adopt it because it has several favorabilities
than the current approach (`README.md` + a `gh-pages` website living in
the `websitescript` branch):
1. The resultant `index.html` has a similar looks and feels with the
official ECMA-262 spec.
2. It uses [Grammarkdown](https://github.com/rbuckton/grammarkdown)
which is not only convenient to write but more importantly, can
enforce the grammar to be more formal.
3. It provides links to ECMA-262 out of the box (closed#112).
Furthurmore, I can use `<ins>` to make "extension" points explicit.
4. It has single source of truth and prevent from syncing issue between the README and website (close The syntax in
website is missing JSXFragment as JSXChild #128)
One possible concern it that it'll make this too like a ECMAScript proposal,
but I think we mediated by opting-out from the "stage-N proposal"
heading, and by explicitly calling out our intention in the
"Introduction" section.
In addition,
- Link to JXON is updated since the original link no more existed.
- Parser and Transpiler section is dropped from the "spec" website.
- Facebook, Inc. is updated to Meta Platform, Inc everywhere.
Once this is merged, we can switch to `main` to host Github Pages.
The syntax in the official website doesn't allow JSXFragment as JSXChild.
It has been added in the master branch by #97, but it hasn't been synced to the website.
https://facebook.github.io/jsx/
Could you update the website to apply the change?
Currently, most of the compilers allow the syntax, so it should be allowed.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: