Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Do not bind topLevelType to dispatch #13618

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Sep 14, 2018

Conversation

nhunzaker
Copy link
Contributor

@nhunzaker nhunzaker commented Sep 11, 2018

This PR is exploratory, but it's been on my mind a long time and I wanted to get others' thoughts.

A previous change (#12629) made it such that all top level event types correspond to their associated native event string values. That means we don't need to bind that event name into dispatchEvent, letting all event listener code use either the standard dispatch function, or the variant for interactive updates.

Why

My primary motivation with this PR isn't to necessarily merge this, but to talk about a few event system things.

Why drop bind()

Dropping this .bind() is attractive to me because I believe we could eventually remove the logic inReactDOMBrowserEventEmitter to track what events have already attached:

function getListeningForDocument(mountAt: any) {
// In IE8, `mountAt` is a host object and doesn't have `hasOwnProperty`
// directly.
if (!Object.prototype.hasOwnProperty.call(mountAt, topListenersIDKey)) {
mountAt[topListenersIDKey] = reactTopListenersCounter++;
alreadyListeningTo[mountAt[topListenersIDKey]] = {};
}
return alreadyListeningTo[mountAt[topListenersIDKey]];
}

const isListening = getListeningForDocument(mountAt);
const dependencies = registrationNameDependencies[registrationName];
for (let i = 0; i < dependencies.length; i++) {
const dependency = dependencies[i];
if (!(isListening.hasOwnProperty(dependency) && isListening[dependency])) {

When working on the scroll-jank PR (#9333), tracking needs to happen per-element for touch, wheel, and scroll events. That means saving state on each DOM node, and doing a lot of property access.

Could it be faster?

I'm curious about the performance characteristics of naively attaching the same event. It could avoid a lot of DOM storage and property access (event listener attachment tracking) if we start to attach listeners locally, since addEventListener is idempotent:

let button = document.createElement('button')
let callback = () => console.log("click!")

button.addEventListener('click', callback)
button.addEventListener('click', callback)

button.click()

Challenges

We can't remove event listener tracking because SelectEventPlugin depends on this tracking to see if it should fire:

// Track whether all listeners exists for this plugin. If none exist, we do
// not extract events. See #3639.
if (!doc || !isListeningToAllDependencies('onSelect', doc)) {
return null;
}

But we might be able to come up with another way to determine when SelectEventPlugin should fire. Maybe, instead of enumerating all plugins at dispatch time, they could be eagerly applied on mount. Then we also wouldn't have to run through all event plugins on every dispatch because the event plugins would have the context to know that their behavior was specifically applied.


Still, it's an interesting series of changes to me, and I wanted to get the thoughts of others.

@@ -16,7 +16,7 @@ import type {TopLevelType} from './TopLevelEventTypes';

export type EventTypes = {[key: string]: DispatchConfig};

export type AnyNativeEvent = Event | KeyboardEvent | MouseEvent | Touch;
export type AnyNativeEvent = Event | KeyboardEvent | MouseEvent | TouchEvent;
Copy link
Contributor Author

@nhunzaker nhunzaker Sep 11, 2018

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This should probably go straight to master. As far as I can tell, this is a bug, but I don't know if Touch is defined somewhere else or is actually correctly referencing the Touch DOM constructor

export function interactiveUpdates(fn, a, b) {
return _interactiveUpdatesImpl(fn, a, b);
export function interactiveUpdates(fn, a) {
return _interactiveUpdatesImpl(fn, a);
}
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This possibly affects other renders 😨

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Have you checked whether it does? ReactGenericBatching is only accessible in this repository.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This should not affect other renders. ReactGenericBatching.interactiveUpdates is only used inside of ReactDOMEventListener.

@pull-bot
Copy link

pull-bot commented Sep 11, 2018

Details of bundled changes.

Comparing: f6fb03e...16ad8d6

schedule

File Filesize Diff Gzip Diff Prev Size Current Size Prev Gzip Current Gzip ENV
schedule.development.js n/a n/a 0 B 19.17 KB 0 B 5.74 KB UMD_DEV
schedule.production.min.js n/a n/a 0 B 3.16 KB 0 B 1.53 KB UMD_PROD

Generated by 🚫 dangerJS

@gaearon
Copy link
Collaborator

gaearon commented Sep 11, 2018

This by itself seems fine to me and is a bit simpler. What's the concern?

@nhunzaker
Copy link
Contributor Author

@gaearon No concerns on my end. I just didn't know if I missed something and wasn't going to push the change too hard.

Copy link
Contributor

@philipp-spiess philipp-spiess left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This looks fine for me as well 🙂

Instead of focusing on your follow ups we should probably start to lay out the „new“ event system Dan mentioned in #13613 (comment) - Ideally all of those issues will be irrelevant by then.

@@ -42,7 +42,9 @@ const [
runEventsInBatch,
] = ReactDOM.__SECRET_INTERNALS_DO_NOT_USE_OR_YOU_WILL_BE_FIRED.Events;

function Event(suffix) {}
function Event(type) {
this.type = type;
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I‘m a bit confused about this - where do we use this event constructor?

Copy link
Contributor Author

@nhunzaker nhunzaker Sep 11, 2018

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

RestTestUtils.SimulateNative:

function makeNativeSimulator(eventType, topLevelType) {
return function(domComponentOrNode, nativeEventData) {
const fakeNativeEvent = new Event(eventType);
Object.assign(fakeNativeEvent, nativeEventData);
if (ReactTestUtils.isDOMComponent(domComponentOrNode)) {
simulateNativeEventOnDOMComponent(
topLevelType,
domComponentOrNode,
fakeNativeEvent,
);
} else if (domComponentOrNode.tagName) {
// Will allow on actual dom nodes.
simulateNativeEventOnNode(
topLevelType,
domComponentOrNode,
fakeNativeEvent,
);
}
};
}

@@ -57,6 +57,8 @@ function getTopLevelCallbackBookKeeping(
targetInst: Fiber | null,
ancestors: Array<Fiber>,
} {
const topLevelType = unsafeCastStringToDOMTopLevelType(nativeEvent.type);
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

What's the guideline for when it's "safe" to call it? How do we know it's okay here?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think it's safe here because we know the nativeEvent type is always a DOMTopLevelType.

This is otherwise only used to cast the top level types themselves when they are created, like:

export const TOP_ABORT = unsafeCastStringToDOMTopLevelType('abort');
export const TOP_ANIMATION_END = unsafeCastStringToDOMTopLevelType(
getVendorPrefixedEventName('animationend'),
);
export const TOP_ANIMATION_ITERATION = unsafeCastStringToDOMTopLevelType(
getVendorPrefixedEventName('animationiteration'),
);

I wonder if there is an existing concept of a DOM event's type string. We don't really have top level types in anymore: just the browser standard event names.

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should have a comment explaining why then.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Commented! Part of me wonders if these could be annotated using the actual event type declarations here:

https://github.com/facebook/flow/blob/08f854876cc72165f1f7a2e023bd8e79e8a7fa02/lib/dom.js#L144-L153

If that were the case, we could remove the concept of a top level type and just make it an DOM event type

@@ -149,7 +152,7 @@ export function trapBubbledEvent(
element,
getRawEventName(topLevelType),
// Check if interactive and wrap in interactiveUpdates
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This comment should move above btw.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Done in 60de292

A previous change made it such that all top level event types
correspond to their associated native event string values. This commit
eliminates the .bind attached to dispatch and fixes a related flow
type.
@nhunzaker
Copy link
Contributor Author

@gaearon I think this is good to go, but would you like me to hold off on a merge during the sync?

@gaearon
Copy link
Collaborator

gaearon commented Sep 12, 2018

It's too late for sync today (spent more time than I thought) so I'll finish it tomorrow. And I plan to cut an open source patch on Monday. So let's wait until then.

@nhunzaker nhunzaker merged commit 0c9c591 into facebook:master Sep 14, 2018
@gaearon
Copy link
Collaborator

gaearon commented Sep 14, 2018

(For context: since @acdlite merged the Scheduler change we'd need to sync on Monday anyway. So this doesn't have to delay now.)

@nhunzaker
Copy link
Contributor Author

Haha. Thanks. I wonder if anyone thought I was going rogue 😅

gaearon added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 17, 2018
gaearon added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 17, 2018
* Revert "Do not bind topLevelType to dispatch (#13618)"

This reverts commit 0c9c591.
Simek pushed a commit to Simek/react that referenced this pull request Oct 25, 2018
* Do not bind topLevelType to dispatch

A previous change made it such that all top level event types
correspond to their associated native event string values. This commit
eliminates the .bind attached to dispatch and fixes a related flow
type.

* Add note about why casting event.type to a topLevelType is safe

* Move interactiveUpdates comment to point of assignment
Simek pushed a commit to Simek/react that referenced this pull request Oct 25, 2018
* Revert "Do not bind topLevelType to dispatch (facebook#13618)"

This reverts commit 0c9c591.
jetoneza pushed a commit to jetoneza/react that referenced this pull request Jan 23, 2019
* Do not bind topLevelType to dispatch

A previous change made it such that all top level event types
correspond to their associated native event string values. This commit
eliminates the .bind attached to dispatch and fixes a related flow
type.

* Add note about why casting event.type to a topLevelType is safe

* Move interactiveUpdates comment to point of assignment
jetoneza pushed a commit to jetoneza/react that referenced this pull request Jan 23, 2019
* Revert "Do not bind topLevelType to dispatch (facebook#13618)"

This reverts commit 0c9c591.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants