Bugfix: Selective hydration triggers false update loop error #27439
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
sebmarkbage
approved these changes
Sep 29, 2023
|
Comparing: 13d0225...90aa765 Critical size changesIncludes critical production bundles, as well as any change greater than 2%:
Significant size changesIncludes any change greater than 0.2%: (No significant changes) |
acdlite
force-pushed
the
fix-false-update-loop-error-selective-hydration
branch
from
3b5c917 to
6e9042a
Compare
This adds a regression test for a case where a sync update triggers selective hydration, which then leads to a "Maximum update depth exceeded" error, even though there was only a single update. This happens when a single sync update flows into many sibling dehydrated Suspense boundaries.
If a commit was the result of selective hydration, we should not increment the nested update count, because those renders conceptually are not updates. Ideally, they wouldn't even be in a separate commit — we should be able to hydrate a tree and apply an update on top of it within the same render phase. We could do this once we implement resumable context stacks.
acdlite
force-pushed
the
fix-false-update-loop-error-selective-hydration
branch
from
6e9042a to
90aa765
Compare
facebook-github-bot
added
CLA Signed
React Core Team
github-actions bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 29, 2023
This adds a regression test and fix for a case where a sync update triggers selective hydration, which then leads to a "Maximum update depth exceeded" error, even though there was only a single update. This happens when a single sync update flows into many sibling dehydrated Suspense boundaries. This fix is, if a commit was the result of selective hydration, we should not increment the nested update count, because those renders conceptually are not updates. Ideally, they wouldn't even be in a separate commit — we should be able to hydrate a tree and apply an update on top of it within the same render phase. We could do this once we implement resumable context stacks. DiffTrain build for [d900fad](d900fad)
acdlite
added a commit
to acdlite/next.js
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 29, 2023
React upstream changes: - facebook/react#27439 - facebook/react#26763 - facebook/react#27434 - facebook/react#27433 - facebook/react#27424 - facebook/react#27428 - facebook/react#27427 - facebook/react#27315 - facebook/react#27314 - facebook/react#27400 - facebook/react#27421 - facebook/react#27419 - facebook/react#27418
kodiakhq bot
pushed a commit
to vercel/next.js
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 3, 2023
Today when we hydrate an SSR'd RSC response on the client we encounter import chunks which initiate code loading for client components. However we only start fetching these chunks after hydration has begun which is necessarily after the initial chunks for the entrypoint have loaded. React has upstream changes that need to land which will preinitialize the rendered chunks for all client components used during the SSR pass. This will cause a `<script async="" src... />` tag to be emitted in the head for each chunk we need to load during hydration which allows the browser to start fetching these resources even before the entrypoint has started to execute. Additionally the implementation for webpack and turbopack is different enough that there will be a new `react-server-dom-turbopack` package in the React repo which should be used when using Turbopack with Next. This PR also removes a number of patches to React src that proxy loading (`__next_chunk_load__`) and bundler requires (`__next_require__`) through the `globalThis` object. Now the react packages can be fully responsible for implementing chunk loading and all Next needs to do is supply the necessary information such as chunk prefix and crossOrigin attributes necessary for this loading. This information is produced as part of the client-manifest by either a Webpack plugin or Turbopack. Additionally any modifications to the chunk filename that were previously done at runtime need to be made in the manifest itself now. This means we need to encode the deployment id for skew protection and encode the filename to make it match our static path matching (and resolutions on s3) when using `[` and `]` segment characters. There are a few followup items to consider in later PRs 1. we currently bundle a node and edge version of react-server-dom-webpack/client. The node version has an implementation for busboy whereas the edge version does not. Next is currently configured to use busboy when handling a fetch action sent as multipart with a node runtime. Ideally we'd only bundle the one platform we are buliding for but some additional refactoring to support better forking is possibly required here This PR also updates react from 09285d5a7 to d900fadbf. ### React upstream changes - facebook/react#27439 - facebook/react#26763 - facebook/react#27434 - facebook/react#27433 - facebook/react#27424 - facebook/react#27428 - facebook/react#27427 - facebook/react#27315 - facebook/react#27314 - facebook/react#27400 - facebook/react#27421 - facebook/react#27419 - facebook/react#27418
EdisonVan
pushed a commit
to EdisonVan/react
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 15, 2024
…k#27439) This adds a regression test and fix for a case where a sync update triggers selective hydration, which then leads to a "Maximum update depth exceeded" error, even though there was only a single update. This happens when a single sync update flows into many sibling dehydrated Suspense boundaries. This fix is, if a commit was the result of selective hydration, we should not increment the nested update count, because those renders conceptually are not updates. Ideally, they wouldn't even be in a separate commit — we should be able to hydrate a tree and apply an update on top of it within the same render phase. We could do this once we implement resumable context stacks.
bigfootjon
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 18, 2024
This adds a regression test and fix for a case where a sync update triggers selective hydration, which then leads to a "Maximum update depth exceeded" error, even though there was only a single update. This happens when a single sync update flows into many sibling dehydrated Suspense boundaries. This fix is, if a commit was the result of selective hydration, we should not increment the nested update count, because those renders conceptually are not updates. Ideally, they wouldn't even be in a separate commit — we should be able to hydrate a tree and apply an update on top of it within the same render phase. We could do this once we implement resumable context stacks. DiffTrain build for commit d900fad.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This adds a regression test and fix for a case where a sync update triggers selective hydration, which then leads to a "Maximum update depth exceeded" error, even though there was only a single update. This happens when a single sync update flows into many sibling dehydrated Suspense boundaries.
This fix is, if a commit was the result of selective hydration, we should not increment the nested update count, because those renders conceptually are not updates.
Ideally, they wouldn't even be in a separate commit — we should be able to hydrate a tree and apply an update on top of it within the same render phase. We could do this once we implement resumable context stacks.