-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 47k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[Fiber] Transfer _debugInfo
from Arrays, Lazy, Thenables and Elements to the inner Fibers.
#28286
Conversation
Comparing: 629541b...83d3c62 Critical size changesIncludes critical production bundles, as well as any change greater than 2%:
Significant size changesIncludes any change greater than 0.2%: Expand to show
|
This doesn't track information if the Lazy resolves to |
6922f83
to
359088d
Compare
+stack?: string, | ||
}; | ||
|
||
export type ReactDebugInfo = Array<ReactComponentInfo | ReactAsyncInfo>; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The plurality of Info switching when talking about the generic vs inner types is a little confusing. maybe ReactDebugEntries
or ReactDebugList
?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I suspect there's a possibility that the inner type moves inwards into an inner set with an outer object that represents an instance of it. So this prepares to not have to rename the outer one.
// If we have two debugInfo, we need to create a new one. This makes the array no longer | ||
// live so we'll miss any future updates if we received more so ideally we should always | ||
// do this after both have fully resolved/unsuspended. | ||
return outer.concat(inner); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
should we just let the debug info optionally be a tuple of debug infos that get flattened wherever they get turned into stacks? then we can write into each array indefinitely?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yea I considered that but it's also annoying given that this will almost never happen. Since the Flight renderer will have a single row for (almost?) all these cases.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It is perhaps in conflict with my other point that DebugInfo might become per-instance objects of some sorts too.
Merge any debug info we got from intermediate objects until we create or update a fiber that can hold it.
359088d
to
83d3c62
Compare
…ts to the inner Fibers. (#28286) That way we can use it for debug information like component stacks and DevTools. I used an extra stack argument in Child Fiber to track this as it's flowing down since it's not just elements where we have this info readily available but parent arrays and lazy can merge this into the Fiber too. It's not great that this is a dev-only argument and I could track it globally but seems more likely to make mistakes. It is possible for the same debug info to appear for multiple child fibers like when it's attached to a fragment or a lazy that resolves to a fragment at the root. The object identity could be used in these scenarios to infer if that's really one server component that's a parent of all children or if each child has a server component with the same name. This is effectively a public API because you can use it to stash information on Promises from a third-party service - not just Server Components. I started outline the types for this for some things I was planning to add but it's not final. I was also planning on storing it from `use(thenable)` for when you suspend on a Promise. However, I realized that there's no Hook instance for those to stash it on. So it might need a separate data structure to stash the previous pass over of `use()` that resets each render. No tests yet since I didn't want to test internals but it'll be covered once we have debugging features like component stacks. DiffTrain build for [3f93ca1](3f93ca1)
Alternative to #28295. Instead of stashing all of the Usables eagerly, we can extract them by replaying the render when we need them like we do with any other hook. We already had an implementation of `use()` but it wasn't quite complete. These can also include further DebugInfo on them such as what Server Component rendered the Promise or async debug info. This is nice just to see which use() calls were made in the side-panel but it can also be used to gather everything that might have suspended. Together with #28286 we cover the case when a Promise was used a child and if it was unwrapped with use(). Notably we don't cover a Promise that was thrown (although we do support that in a Server Component which maybe we shouldn't). Throwing a Promise isn't officially supported though and that use case should move to the use() Hook. The pattern of conditionally suspending based on cache also isn't really supported with the use() pattern. You should always call use() if you previously called use() with the same input. This also ensures that we can track what might have suspended rather than what actually did. One limitation of this strategy is that it's hard to find all the places something might suspend in a tree without rerendering all the fibers again. So we might need to still add something to the tree to indicate which Fibers may have further debug info / thenables.
### React upstream changes - facebook/react#28333 - facebook/react#28334 - facebook/react#28378 - facebook/react#28377 - facebook/react#28376 - facebook/react#28338 - facebook/react#28331 - facebook/react#28336 - facebook/react#28320 - facebook/react#28317 - facebook/react#28375 - facebook/react#28367 - facebook/react#28380 - facebook/react#28368 - facebook/react#28343 - facebook/react#28355 - facebook/react#28374 - facebook/react#28362 - facebook/react#28344 - facebook/react#28339 - facebook/react#28353 - facebook/react#28346 - facebook/react#25790 - facebook/react#28352 - facebook/react#28326 - facebook/react#27688 - facebook/react#28329 - facebook/react#28332 - facebook/react#28340 - facebook/react#28327 - facebook/react#28325 - facebook/react#28324 - facebook/react#28309 - facebook/react#28310 - facebook/react#28307 - facebook/react#28306 - facebook/react#28315 - facebook/react#28318 - facebook/react#28226 - facebook/react#28308 - facebook/react#27563 - facebook/react#28297 - facebook/react#28286 - facebook/react#28284 - facebook/react#28275 - facebook/react#28145 - facebook/react#28301 - facebook/react#28224 - facebook/react#28152 - facebook/react#28296 - facebook/react#28294 - facebook/react#28279 - facebook/react#28273 - facebook/react#28269 - facebook/react#28376 - facebook/react#28338 - facebook/react#28331 - facebook/react#28336 - facebook/react#28320 - facebook/react#28317 - facebook/react#28375 - facebook/react#28367 - facebook/react#28380 - facebook/react#28368 - facebook/react#28343 - facebook/react#28355 - facebook/react#28374 - facebook/react#28362 - facebook/react#28344 - facebook/react#28339 - facebook/react#28353 - facebook/react#28346 - facebook/react#25790 - facebook/react#28352 - facebook/react#28326 - facebook/react#27688 - facebook/react#28329 - facebook/react#28332 - facebook/react#28340 - facebook/react#28327 - facebook/react#28325 - facebook/react#28324 - facebook/react#28309 - facebook/react#28310 - facebook/react#28307 - facebook/react#28306 - facebook/react#28315 - facebook/react#28318 - facebook/react#28226 - facebook/react#28308 - facebook/react#27563 - facebook/react#28297 - facebook/react#28286 - facebook/react#28284 - facebook/react#28275 - facebook/react#28145 - facebook/react#28301 - facebook/react#28224 - facebook/react#28152 - facebook/react#28296 - facebook/react#28294 - facebook/react#28279 - facebook/react#28273 - facebook/react#28269 Closes NEXT-2542 Disable ppr test for strict mode for now, @acdlite will check it and we'll sync again
…ts to the inner Fibers. (facebook#28286) That way we can use it for debug information like component stacks and DevTools. I used an extra stack argument in Child Fiber to track this as it's flowing down since it's not just elements where we have this info readily available but parent arrays and lazy can merge this into the Fiber too. It's not great that this is a dev-only argument and I could track it globally but seems more likely to make mistakes. It is possible for the same debug info to appear for multiple child fibers like when it's attached to a fragment or a lazy that resolves to a fragment at the root. The object identity could be used in these scenarios to infer if that's really one server component that's a parent of all children or if each child has a server component with the same name. This is effectively a public API because you can use it to stash information on Promises from a third-party service - not just Server Components. I started outline the types for this for some things I was planning to add but it's not final. I was also planning on storing it from `use(thenable)` for when you suspend on a Promise. However, I realized that there's no Hook instance for those to stash it on. So it might need a separate data structure to stash the previous pass over of `use()` that resets each render. No tests yet since I didn't want to test internals but it'll be covered once we have debugging features like component stacks.
Alternative to facebook#28295. Instead of stashing all of the Usables eagerly, we can extract them by replaying the render when we need them like we do with any other hook. We already had an implementation of `use()` but it wasn't quite complete. These can also include further DebugInfo on them such as what Server Component rendered the Promise or async debug info. This is nice just to see which use() calls were made in the side-panel but it can also be used to gather everything that might have suspended. Together with facebook#28286 we cover the case when a Promise was used a child and if it was unwrapped with use(). Notably we don't cover a Promise that was thrown (although we do support that in a Server Component which maybe we shouldn't). Throwing a Promise isn't officially supported though and that use case should move to the use() Hook. The pattern of conditionally suspending based on cache also isn't really supported with the use() pattern. You should always call use() if you previously called use() with the same input. This also ensures that we can track what might have suspended rather than what actually did. One limitation of this strategy is that it's hard to find all the places something might suspend in a tree without rerendering all the fibers again. So we might need to still add something to the tree to indicate which Fibers may have further debug info / thenables.
…ts to the inner Fibers. (#28286) That way we can use it for debug information like component stacks and DevTools. I used an extra stack argument in Child Fiber to track this as it's flowing down since it's not just elements where we have this info readily available but parent arrays and lazy can merge this into the Fiber too. It's not great that this is a dev-only argument and I could track it globally but seems more likely to make mistakes. It is possible for the same debug info to appear for multiple child fibers like when it's attached to a fragment or a lazy that resolves to a fragment at the root. The object identity could be used in these scenarios to infer if that's really one server component that's a parent of all children or if each child has a server component with the same name. This is effectively a public API because you can use it to stash information on Promises from a third-party service - not just Server Components. I started outline the types for this for some things I was planning to add but it's not final. I was also planning on storing it from `use(thenable)` for when you suspend on a Promise. However, I realized that there's no Hook instance for those to stash it on. So it might need a separate data structure to stash the previous pass over of `use()` that resets each render. No tests yet since I didn't want to test internals but it'll be covered once we have debugging features like component stacks. DiffTrain build for commit 3f93ca1.
Stacked on #29804. Transferring of debugInfo was added in #28286. It represents the parent stack between the current Fiber and into the next Fiber we're about to create. I.e. Server Components in between. ~I don't love passing DEV-only fields as arguments anyway since I don't trust closure to remove unused arguments that way.~ EDIT: Actually it seems like closure handled that just fine before which is why this is no change in prod. Instead, I track it on the module scope. Notably with DON'T use try/finally because if something throws we want to observe what it was at the time we threw. Like the pattern we use many other places. Now we can use this when we create the Throw Fiber to associate the Server Components that were part of the parent stack before this error threw. There by giving us the correct parent stacks at the location that threw.
That way we can use it for debug information like component stacks and DevTools. I used an extra stack argument in Child Fiber to track this as it's flowing down since it's not just elements where we have this info readily available but parent arrays and lazy can merge this into the Fiber too. It's not great that this is a dev-only argument and I could track it globally but seems more likely to make mistakes.
It is possible for the same debug info to appear for multiple child fibers like when it's attached to a fragment or a lazy that resolves to a fragment at the root. The object identity could be used in these scenarios to infer if that's really one server component that's a parent of all children or if each child has a server component with the same name.
This is effectively a public API because you can use it to stash information on Promises from a third-party service - not just Server Components. I started outline the types for this for some things I was planning to add but it's not final.
I was also planning on storing it from
use(thenable)
for when you suspend on a Promise. However, I realized that there's no Hook instance for those to stash it on. So it might need a separate data structure to stash the previous pass over ofuse()
that resets each render.No tests yet since I didn't want to test internals but it'll be covered once we have debugging features like component stacks.