[compiler] rfc: Include location information in identifiers and reactive scopes for debugging #29658
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
…ive scopes for debugging Summary: Using the change detection code to debug codebases that violate the rules of react is a lot easier when we have a source location corresponding to the value that has changed inappropriately. I didn't see an easy way to track that information in the existing data structures at the point of codegen, so this PR adds locations to identifiers and reactive scopes (the location of a reactive scope is the range of the locations of its included identifiers). I'm interested if there's a better way to do this that I missed! [ghstack-poisoned]
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
|
This was referenced May 29, 2024
mvitousek
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 29, 2024
…ive scopes for debugging Summary: Using the change detection code to debug codebases that violate the rules of react is a lot easier when we have a source location corresponding to the value that has changed inappropriately. I didn't see an easy way to track that information in the existing data structures at the point of codegen, so this PR adds locations to identifiers and reactive scopes (the location of a reactive scope is the range of the locations of its included identifiers). I'm interested if there's a better way to do this that I missed! ghstack-source-id: efdb63e8f7755072e52fe54b33952299c910a502 Pull Request resolved: #29658
|
Comparing: 63d673c...819c414 Critical size changesIncludes critical production bundles, as well as any change greater than 2%:
Significant size changesIncludes any change greater than 0.2%: Expand to show
|
…s and reactive scopes for debugging" Summary: Using the change detection code to debug codebases that violate the rules of react is a lot easier when we have a source location corresponding to the value that has changed inappropriately. I didn't see an easy way to track that information in the existing data structures at the point of codegen, so this PR adds locations to identifiers and reactive scopes (the location of a reactive scope is the range of the locations of its included identifiers). I'm interested if there's a better way to do this that I missed! [ghstack-poisoned]
mvitousek
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 30, 2024
…ive scopes for debugging Summary: Using the change detection code to debug codebases that violate the rules of react is a lot easier when we have a source location corresponding to the value that has changed inappropriately. I didn't see an easy way to track that information in the existing data structures at the point of codegen, so this PR adds locations to identifiers and reactive scopes (the location of a reactive scope is the range of the locations of its included identifiers). I'm interested if there's a better way to do this that I missed! ghstack-source-id: 99e6cfed43cdcb1ca13653c5ed1c0c3028b7e5a3 Pull Request resolved: #29658
josephsavona
approved these changes
May 30, 2024
…s and reactive scopes for debugging" Summary: Using the change detection code to debug codebases that violate the rules of react is a lot easier when we have a source location corresponding to the value that has changed inappropriately. I didn't see an easy way to track that information in the existing data structures at the point of codegen, so this PR adds locations to identifiers and reactive scopes (the location of a reactive scope is the range of the locations of its included identifiers). I'm interested if there's a better way to do this that I missed! [ghstack-poisoned]
mvitousek
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 31, 2024
…ive scopes for debugging Summary: Using the change detection code to debug codebases that violate the rules of react is a lot easier when we have a source location corresponding to the value that has changed inappropriately. I didn't see an easy way to track that information in the existing data structures at the point of codegen, so this PR adds locations to identifiers and reactive scopes (the location of a reactive scope is the range of the locations of its included identifiers). I'm interested if there's a better way to do this that I missed! ghstack-source-id: aa768e0aaf0bf071a0b1f445c9c3944654f7947c Pull Request resolved: #29658
josephsavona
approved these changes
May 31, 2024
…s and reactive scopes for debugging" Summary: Using the change detection code to debug codebases that violate the rules of react is a lot easier when we have a source location corresponding to the value that has changed inappropriately. I didn't see an easy way to track that information in the existing data structures at the point of codegen, so this PR adds locations to identifiers and reactive scopes (the location of a reactive scope is the range of the locations of its included identifiers). I'm interested if there's a better way to do this that I missed! [ghstack-poisoned]
mvitousek
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 31, 2024
…ive scopes for debugging Summary: Using the change detection code to debug codebases that violate the rules of react is a lot easier when we have a source location corresponding to the value that has changed inappropriately. I didn't see an easy way to track that information in the existing data structures at the point of codegen, so this PR adds locations to identifiers and reactive scopes (the location of a reactive scope is the range of the locations of its included identifiers). I'm interested if there's a better way to do this that I missed! ghstack-source-id: 7b2827ff8c6d7111f57104c968f3db67efe3b2b9 Pull Request resolved: #29658
…s and reactive scopes for debugging" Summary: Using the change detection code to debug codebases that violate the rules of react is a lot easier when we have a source location corresponding to the value that has changed inappropriately. I didn't see an easy way to track that information in the existing data structures at the point of codegen, so this PR adds locations to identifiers and reactive scopes (the location of a reactive scope is the range of the locations of its included identifiers). I'm interested if there's a better way to do this that I missed! [ghstack-poisoned]
mvitousek
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 31, 2024
…ive scopes for debugging Summary: Using the change detection code to debug codebases that violate the rules of react is a lot easier when we have a source location corresponding to the value that has changed inappropriately. I didn't see an easy way to track that information in the existing data structures at the point of codegen, so this PR adds locations to identifiers and reactive scopes (the location of a reactive scope is the range of the locations of its included identifiers). I'm interested if there's a better way to do this that I missed! ghstack-source-id: 1f8aa10780526d50b51899c7b2d9faec1c31b78f Pull Request resolved: #29658
josephsavona
approved these changes
May 31, 2024
…s and reactive scopes for debugging" Summary: Using the change detection code to debug codebases that violate the rules of react is a lot easier when we have a source location corresponding to the value that has changed inappropriately. I didn't see an easy way to track that information in the existing data structures at the point of codegen, so this PR adds locations to identifiers and reactive scopes (the location of a reactive scope is the range of the locations of its included identifiers). I'm interested if there's a better way to do this that I missed! [ghstack-poisoned]
mvitousek
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 31, 2024
…ive scopes for debugging Summary: Using the change detection code to debug codebases that violate the rules of react is a lot easier when we have a source location corresponding to the value that has changed inappropriately. I didn't see an easy way to track that information in the existing data structures at the point of codegen, so this PR adds locations to identifiers and reactive scopes (the location of a reactive scope is the range of the locations of its included identifiers). I'm interested if there's a better way to do this that I missed! ghstack-source-id: aed5f7eddae7256f41da4389e8f16fcb3daaee49 Pull Request resolved: #29658
github-actions bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 31, 2024
…ive scopes for debugging Summary: Using the change detection code to debug codebases that violate the rules of react is a lot easier when we have a source location corresponding to the value that has changed inappropriately. I didn't see an easy way to track that information in the existing data structures at the point of codegen, so this PR adds locations to identifiers and reactive scopes (the location of a reactive scope is the range of the locations of its included identifiers). I'm interested if there's a better way to do this that I missed! ghstack-source-id: aed5f7eddae7256f41da4389e8f16fcb3daaee49 Pull Request resolved: #29658 DiffTrain build for commit ec6fe57.
github-actions bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 31, 2024
…ive scopes for debugging Summary: Using the change detection code to debug codebases that violate the rules of react is a lot easier when we have a source location corresponding to the value that has changed inappropriately. I didn't see an easy way to track that information in the existing data structures at the point of codegen, so this PR adds locations to identifiers and reactive scopes (the location of a reactive scope is the range of the locations of its included identifiers). I'm interested if there's a better way to do this that I missed! ghstack-source-id: aed5f7eddae7256f41da4389e8f16fcb3daaee49 Pull Request resolved: #29658 DiffTrain build for [ec6fe57](ec6fe57)
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Stack from ghstack (oldest at bottom):
Summary: Using the change detection code to debug codebases that violate the rules of react is a lot easier when we have a source location corresponding to the value that has changed inappropriately. I didn't see an easy way to track that information in the existing data structures at the point of codegen, so this PR adds locations to identifiers and reactive scopes (the location of a reactive scope is the range of the locations of its included identifiers).
I'm interested if there's a better way to do this that I missed!