[compiler] Track locations for dependencies#35794
Merged
josephsavona merged 1 commit intomainfrom Feb 17, 2026
Merged
Conversation
Tracks locations for reactive scope dependencies, both on the deps and portions of the path. The immediate need for this is a non-public experiment where we're exploring type-directed compilation, and sometimes look up the types of expressions by location. We need to preserve locations accurately for that to work, including the locations of the deps. ## Test Plan Locations for dependencies are not easy to test: i manually spot-checked the new fixture to ensure that the deps look right. This is fine as best-effort since it doesn't impact any of our core compilation logic, i may fix forward if there are issues and will think about how to test.
79de580 to
6616fc6
Compare
mvitousek
approved these changes
Feb 17, 2026
github-actions bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 17, 2026
Tracks locations for reactive scope dependencies, both on the deps and portions of the path. The immediate need for this is a non-public experiment where we're exploring type-directed compilation, and sometimes look up the types of expressions by location. We need to preserve locations accurately for that to work, including the locations of the deps. ## Test Plan Locations for dependencies are not easy to test: i manually spot-checked the new fixture to ensure that the deps look right. This is fine as best-effort since it doesn't impact any of our core compilation logic, i may fix forward if there are issues and will think about how to test. DiffTrain build for [4ac4753](4ac4753)
github-actions bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 17, 2026
Tracks locations for reactive scope dependencies, both on the deps and portions of the path. The immediate need for this is a non-public experiment where we're exploring type-directed compilation, and sometimes look up the types of expressions by location. We need to preserve locations accurately for that to work, including the locations of the deps. ## Test Plan Locations for dependencies are not easy to test: i manually spot-checked the new fixture to ensure that the deps look right. This is fine as best-effort since it doesn't impact any of our core compilation logic, i may fix forward if there are issues and will think about how to test. DiffTrain build for [4ac4753](4ac4753)
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Tracks locations for reactive scope dependencies, both on the deps and portions of the path. The immediate need for this is a non-public experiment where we're exploring type-directed compilation, and sometimes look up the types of expressions by location. We need to preserve locations accurately for that to work, including the locations of the deps.
Test Plan
Locations for dependencies are not easy to test: i manually spot-checked the new fixture to ensure that the deps look right. This is fine as best-effort since it doesn't impact any of our core compilation logic, i may fix forward if there are issues and will think about how to test.