Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Rollback other pending memtable flushes when a flush fails #11865

Closed
wants to merge 7 commits into from

Conversation

cbi42
Copy link
Member

@cbi42 cbi42 commented Sep 20, 2023

Summary: when atomic_flush=false, there are certain cases where we try to install memtable results with already deleted SST files. This can happen when the following sequence events happen:

Start Flush0 for memtable M0 to SST0
Start Flush1 for memtable M1 to SST1
Flush 1 returns OK, but don't install to MANIFEST and let whoever flushes M0 to take care of it
Flush0 finishes with a retryable IOError, it rollbacks M0, (incorrectly) does not rollback M1, and deletes SST0 and SST1
Starts Flush2 for M0, it does not pick up M1 since it thought M1 is flushed
Flush2 writes SST2 and finishes OK, tries to install SST2 and SST1
Error opening SST1 since it's already deleted with an  error message like the following:

IO error: No such file or directory: While open a file for random read: /tmp/rocksdbtest-501/db_flush_test_3577_4230653031040984171/000011.sst: No such file or directory

This happens since:

  1. We currently only rollback the memtables that we are flushing in a flush job when atomic_flush=false.
  2. Pending output SSTs from previous flushes are deleted since a pending file number is released whenever a flush job is finished no matter of flush status:
    ReleaseFileNumberFromPendingOutputs(pending_outputs_inserted_elem);

This PR fixes the issue by rollback these pending flushes.

There is another issue where if a new flush for new memtable starts and finishes after Flush0 finishes. Its output may also be deleted (see more in unit test). It is fixed by checking bg error status before installing a memtable result, and rollback if there is an error.

There is a more efficient fix where we just don't release the pending file output number for flushes that delegate installation. It is more efficient since it does not have to rewrite the flush output file. With the fix in this PR, we can end up with a giant file if a lot of memtables are being flushed together. However, the more efficient fix is a bit more complicated to implement (requires associating such pending file numbers with flush job/memtables) and is more risky since it changes normal flush code path.

Test plan:

  • Added repro unit tests.

@cbi42 cbi42 marked this pull request as draft September 20, 2023 20:26
@cbi42 cbi42 force-pushed the non-atomic-flush-fix branch 2 times, most recently from c1c9906 to f2ee4f7 Compare September 21, 2023 00:09
@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

@cbi42 has imported this pull request. If you are a Meta employee, you can view this diff on Phabricator.

@cbi42 cbi42 marked this pull request as ready for review September 21, 2023 00:39
@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

@cbi42 has updated the pull request. You must reimport the pull request before landing.

1 similar comment
@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

@cbi42 has updated the pull request. You must reimport the pull request before landing.

@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

@cbi42 has updated the pull request. You must reimport the pull request before landing.

@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

@cbi42 has updated the pull request. You must reimport the pull request before landing.

Copy link
Contributor

@anand1976 anand1976 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM. Thanks!

db/flush_job.cc Outdated
log_buffer_, &committed_flush_jobs_info_,
!(mempurge_s.ok()) /* write_edit : true if no mempurge happened (or if aborted),
assert(!db_options_.atomic_flush);
if (!db_options_.atomic_flush && skip_since_bg_error &&
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Do we need to check for skip_since_bg_error being non-null here? Regardless, we might want to rollback if there's a bg error.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes, removed the check.


TEST_SYNC_POINT("Wait for error recover");
ASSERT_EQ(1, NumTableFilesAtLevel(0));
}
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Disable SyncPoint processing and callbacks?

@@ -296,6 +297,9 @@ Status DBImpl::FlushMemTableToOutputFile(
flush_reason);

bool switched_to_mempurge = false;
// If we exit a flush job since there is already a bg error,
// we should not set the bg error again.
bool skip_since_bg_error = false;
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Maybe call it skip_set_bg_error to make the purpose clearer.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes, updated the name in FlushMemtableToOutputFile and FlushJob.

@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

@cbi42 has updated the pull request. You must reimport the pull request before landing.

1 similar comment
@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

@cbi42 has updated the pull request. You must reimport the pull request before landing.

@cbi42
Copy link
Member Author

cbi42 commented Sep 21, 2023

Thanks for the review! I made one additional change about checking bg error before PickMemtable(). This is to prevent a non-recovery flush from picking all memtable, which means a concurrent recovery flush cannot pick any memtable. Then the non-recovery flush rollbacks all of them due to the new change we made in FlushJob::Run(). I think the recovery thread can stuck in waiting for flush to finish in this case.

Edit: we may drop flushes that do no have error recovery as FlushReason when we fix the issue with atomic_flush=true later. But I'm including this change here to hopefully make this PR not introducing new stuck scenario.

@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

@cbi42 has imported this pull request. If you are a Meta employee, you can view this diff on Phabricator.

@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

@cbi42 has updated the pull request. You must reimport the pull request before landing.

@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

@cbi42 has imported this pull request. If you are a Meta employee, you can view this diff on Phabricator.

Copy link
Contributor

@anand1976 anand1976 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

@cbi42 merged this pull request in b927ba5.

cbi42 added a commit to cbi42/rocksdb that referenced this pull request Sep 25, 2023
…11865)

Summary:
when atomic_flush=false, there are certain cases where we try to install memtable results with already deleted SST files. This can happen when the following sequence events happen:
```
Start Flush0 for memtable M0 to SST0
Start Flush1 for memtable M1 to SST1
Flush 1 returns OK, but don't install to MANIFEST and let whoever flushes M0 to take care of it
Flush0 finishes with a retryable IOError, it rollbacks M0, (incorrectly) does not rollback M1, and deletes SST0 and SST1
Starts Flush2 for M0, it does not pick up M1 since it thought M1 is flushed
Flush2 writes SST2 and finishes OK, tries to install SST2 and SST1
Error opening SST1 since it's already deleted with an  error message like the following:

IO error: No such file or directory: While open a file for random read: /tmp/rocksdbtest-501/db_flush_test_3577_4230653031040984171/000011.sst: No such file or directory
```

This happens since:
1. We currently only rollback the memtables that we are flushing in a flush job when atomic_flush=false.
2. Pending output SSTs from previous flushes are deleted since a pending file number is released whenever a flush job is finished no matter of flush status: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/blob/f42e70bf561d4be9b6bbe7316d1c2c0c8a3818e6/db/db_impl/db_impl_compaction_flush.cc#L3161

This PR fixes the issue by rollback these pending flushes.

There is another issue where if a new flush for new memtable starts and finishes after Flush0 finishes. Its output may also be deleted (see more in unit test). It is fixed by checking bg error status before installing a memtable result, and rollback if there is an error.

There is a more efficient fix where we just don't release the pending file output number for flushes that delegate installation. It is more efficient since it does not have to rewrite the flush output file. With the fix in this PR, we can end up with a giant file if a lot of memtables are being flushed together. However, the more efficient fix is a bit more complicated to implement (requires associating such pending file numbers with flush job/memtables) and is more risky since it changes normal flush code path.

Pull Request resolved: facebook#11865

Test Plan: * Added repro unit tests.

Reviewed By: anand1976

Differential Revision: D49484922

Pulled By: cbi42

fbshipit-source-id: 25b536c08f4e02e7f1d0f86571663737d2b5d53d
@cbi42 cbi42 mentioned this pull request Sep 25, 2023
cbi42 added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 25, 2023
* Rollback other pending memtable flushes when a flush fails (#11865)

Summary:
when atomic_flush=false, there are certain cases where we try to install memtable results with already deleted SST files. This can happen when the following sequence events happen:
```
Start Flush0 for memtable M0 to SST0
Start Flush1 for memtable M1 to SST1
Flush 1 returns OK, but don't install to MANIFEST and let whoever flushes M0 to take care of it
Flush0 finishes with a retryable IOError, it rollbacks M0, (incorrectly) does not rollback M1, and deletes SST0 and SST1
Starts Flush2 for M0, it does not pick up M1 since it thought M1 is flushed
Flush2 writes SST2 and finishes OK, tries to install SST2 and SST1
Error opening SST1 since it's already deleted with an  error message like the following:

IO error: No such file or directory: While open a file for random read: /tmp/rocksdbtest-501/db_flush_test_3577_4230653031040984171/000011.sst: No such file or directory
```

This happens since:
1. We currently only rollback the memtables that we are flushing in a flush job when atomic_flush=false.
2. Pending output SSTs from previous flushes are deleted since a pending file number is released whenever a flush job is finished no matter of flush status: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/blob/f42e70bf561d4be9b6bbe7316d1c2c0c8a3818e6/db/db_impl/db_impl_compaction_flush.cc#L3161

This PR fixes the issue by rollback these pending flushes.

There is another issue where if a new flush for new memtable starts and finishes after Flush0 finishes. Its output may also be deleted (see more in unit test). It is fixed by checking bg error status before installing a memtable result, and rollback if there is an error.

There is a more efficient fix where we just don't release the pending file output number for flushes that delegate installation. It is more efficient since it does not have to rewrite the flush output file. With the fix in this PR, we can end up with a giant file if a lot of memtables are being flushed together. However, the more efficient fix is a bit more complicated to implement (requires associating such pending file numbers with flush job/memtables) and is more risky since it changes normal flush code path.

Pull Request resolved: #11865

Test Plan: * Added repro unit tests.

Reviewed By: anand1976

Differential Revision: D49484922

Pulled By: cbi42

fbshipit-source-id: 25b536c08f4e02e7f1d0f86571663737d2b5d53d

* Fix a bug with atomic_flush that causes DB to stuck after a flush failure (#11872)

Summary:
With atomic_flush=true, a flush job with younger memtables wait for older memtables to be installed before install its memtables. If the flush for older memtables failed, auto-recovery starts a resume thread which can becomes stuck waiting for all background work to finish (including the flush for younger memtables). If a non-recovery flush starts now and tries to flush, it can make the situation worse since it will fail due to background error but never rollback its memtable: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/blob/269478ee4618283cd6d710fdfea9687157a259c1/db/db_impl/db_impl_compaction_flush.cc#L725 This prevents any future flush to pick old memtables.

A more detailed repro is in unit test.

This PR fixes this issue by
1. Ensure we rollback memtables if an atomic flush fails due to background error
2. When there is a background error, abort atomic flushes that are waiting for older memtables to be installed
3. Do not schedule non-recovery flushes when there is a background error that stops background work

There was another issue with atomic_flush=true where DB can hang during DB close, see more in #11867. The fix in this PR, specifically fix 2 above, should be enough to resolve it too.

Pull Request resolved: #11872

Test Plan: new unit test.

Reviewed By: jowlyzhang

Differential Revision: D49556867

Pulled By: cbi42

fbshipit-source-id: 4a0210ff28a8552a99ece7fbb0f574fd24b4da3f

* Only flush after recovery for retryable IOError (#11880)

Summary:
#11872 causes a unit test to start failing with the error message below. The cause is that the additional call to `FlushAllColumnFamilies()` in `DBImpl::ResumeImpl()` can run while DB is closing. More detailed explanation: there are two places where we call `ResumeImpl()`:

1. in `ErrorHandler::RecoverFromBGError`, for manual resume or recovery from errors like OutOfSpace through sst file manager, and
2. in `Errorhandler::RecoverFromRetryableBGIOError`, for error recovery from errors like flush failure due to retryable IOError. This is tracked by `ErrorHandler::recovery_thread_`.

Here is how DB close waits for error recovery: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/blob/49da91ec097b4efcd8a8e4dc1b287e9f81eb4093/db/db_impl/db_impl.cc#L540-L543

`CancelErrorRecovery()` waits until `recovery_thread_` finishes and `IsRecoveryInProgress()` checks the `recovery_in_prog_` flag. The additional call to `FlushAllColumnFamilies()` in `ResumeImpl()` happens after it clears bg error and the `recovery_in_prog_` flag: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/blob/49da91ec097b4efcd8a8e4dc1b287e9f81eb4093/db/db_impl/db_impl.cc#L436-L463. So if `ResumeImpl()` is called in `RecoverFromBGError()`, we can have a thread running `FlushAllColumnFamilies()` while DB is closing and thought that recovery is done.

The fix is to only do the additional call to `FlushAllColumnFamilies()` when doing error recovery through `Errorhandler::RecoverFromRetryableBGIOError` by setting flags in `DBRecoverContext`.

Pull Request resolved: #11880

Test Plan:
`gtest-parallel --repeat=100 --workers=4 ./error_handler_fs_test --gtest_filter="*AutoRecoverFlushError*"` reproduces the error pretty reliably.

```[==========] Running 1 test from 1 test case.
[----------] Global test environment set-up.
[----------] 1 test from DBErrorHandlingFSTest
[ RUN      ] DBErrorHandlingFSTest.AutoRecoverFlushError
error_handler_fs_test: db/column_family.cc:1618: rocksdb::ColumnFamilySet::~ColumnFamilySet(): Assertion `last_ref' failed.
Received signal 6 (Aborted)
...
#10 0x00007fac4409efd6 in __GI___assert_fail (assertion=0x7fac452c0afa "last_ref", file=0x7fac452c9fb5 "db/column_family.cc", line=1618, function=0x7fac452cb950 "rocksdb::ColumnFamilySet::~ColumnFamilySet()") at assert.c:101
101     in assert.c
#11 0x00007fac44b5324f in rocksdb::ColumnFamilySet::~ColumnFamilySet (this=0x7b5400000000) at db/column_family.cc:1618
1618        assert(last_ref);
#12 0x00007fac44e0f047 in std::default_delete<rocksdb::ColumnFamilySet>::operator() (this=0x7b5800000940, __ptr=0x7b5400000000) at /usr/bin/../lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/11/../../../../include/c++/11/bits/unique_ptr.h:85
85              delete __ptr;
#13 std::__uniq_ptr_impl<rocksdb::ColumnFamilySet, std::default_delete<rocksdb::ColumnFamilySet> >::reset (this=0x7b5800000940, __p=0x0) at /usr/bin/../lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/11/../../../../include/c++/11/bits/unique_ptr.h:182
182               _M_deleter()(__old_p);
#14 std::unique_ptr<rocksdb::ColumnFamilySet, std::default_delete<rocksdb::ColumnFamilySet> >::reset (this=0x7b5800000940, __p=0x0) at /usr/bin/../lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/11/../../../../include/c++/11/bits/unique_ptr.h:456
456             _M_t.reset(std::move(__p));
#15 rocksdb::VersionSet::~VersionSet (this=this@entry=0x7b5800000900) at db/version_set.cc:5081
5081      column_family_set_.reset();
#16 0x00007fac44e0f97a in rocksdb::VersionSet::~VersionSet (this=0x7b5800000900) at db/version_set.cc:5078
5078    VersionSet::~VersionSet() {
#17 0x00007fac44bf0b2f in std::default_delete<rocksdb::VersionSet>::operator() (this=0x7b8c00000068, __ptr=0x7b5800000900) at /usr/bin/../lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/11/../../../../include/c++/11/bits/unique_ptr.h:85
85              delete __ptr;
#18 std::__uniq_ptr_impl<rocksdb::VersionSet, std::default_delete<rocksdb::VersionSet> >::reset (this=0x7b8c00000068, __p=0x0) at /usr/bin/../lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/11/../../../../include/c++/11/bits/unique_ptr.h:182
182               _M_deleter()(__old_p);
#19 std::unique_ptr<rocksdb::VersionSet, std::default_delete<rocksdb::VersionSet> >::reset (this=0x7b8c00000068, __p=0x0) at /usr/bin/../lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/11/../../../../include/c++/11/bits/unique_ptr.h:456
456             _M_t.reset(std::move(__p));
#20 rocksdb::DBImpl::CloseHelper (this=this@entry=0x7b8c00000000) at db/db_impl/db_impl.cc:676
676       versions_.reset();
#21 0x00007fac44bf1346 in rocksdb::DBImpl::CloseImpl (this=0x7b8c00000000) at db/db_impl/db_impl.cc:720
720     Status DBImpl::CloseImpl() { return CloseHelper(); }
#22 rocksdb::DBImpl::~DBImpl (this=this@entry=0x7b8c00000000) at db/db_impl/db_impl.cc:738
738       closing_status_ = CloseImpl();
#23 0x00007fac44bf2bba in rocksdb::DBImpl::~DBImpl (this=0x7b8c00000000) at db/db_impl/db_impl.cc:722
722     DBImpl::~DBImpl() {
#24 0x00007fac455444d4 in rocksdb::DBTestBase::Close (this=this@entry=0x7b6c00000000) at db/db_test_util.cc:678
678       delete db_;
#25 0x00007fac455455fb in rocksdb::DBTestBase::TryReopen (this=this@entry=0x7b6c00000000, options=...) at db/db_test_util.cc:707
707       Close();
#26 0x00007fac45543459 in rocksdb::DBTestBase::Reopen (this=0x7ffed74b79a0, options=...) at db/db_test_util.cc:670
670       ASSERT_OK(TryReopen(options));
#27 0x00000000004f2522 in rocksdb::DBErrorHandlingFSTest_AutoRecoverFlushError_Test::TestBody (this=this@entry=0x7b6c00000000) at db/error_handler_fs_test.cc:1224
1224      Reopen(options);
```

Reviewed By: jowlyzhang

Differential Revision: D49579701

Pulled By: cbi42

fbshipit-source-id: 3fc8325e6dde7e7faa8bcad95060cb4e26eda638

* Update HISTORY.md and version.h for 8.6.6
rockeet pushed a commit to topling/toplingdb that referenced this pull request Dec 19, 2023
Summary:
when atomic_flush=false, there are certain cases where we try to install memtable results with already deleted SST files. This can happen when the following sequence events happen:
```
Start Flush0 for memtable M0 to SST0
Start Flush1 for memtable M1 to SST1
Flush 1 returns OK, but don't install to MANIFEST and let whoever flushes M0 to take care of it
Flush0 finishes with a retryable IOError, it rollbacks M0, (incorrectly) does not rollback M1, and deletes SST0 and SST1
Starts Flush2 for M0, it does not pick up M1 since it thought M1 is flushed
Flush2 writes SST2 and finishes OK, tries to install SST2 and SST1
Error opening SST1 since it's already deleted with an  error message like the following:

IO error: No such file or directory: While open a file for random read: /tmp/rocksdbtest-501/db_flush_test_3577_4230653031040984171/000011.sst: No such file or directory
```

This happens since:
1. We currently only rollback the memtables that we are flushing in a flush job when atomic_flush=false.
2. Pending output SSTs from previous flushes are deleted since a pending file number is released whenever a flush job is finished no matter of flush status: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/blob/f42e70bf561d4be9b6bbe7316d1c2c0c8a3818e6/db/db_impl/db_impl_compaction_flush.cc#L3161

This PR fixes the issue by rollback these pending flushes.

There is another issue where if a new flush for new memtable starts and finishes after Flush0 finishes. Its output may also be deleted (see more in unit test). It is fixed by checking bg error status before installing a memtable result, and rollback if there is an error.

There is a more efficient fix where we just don't release the pending file output number for flushes that delegate installation. It is more efficient since it does not have to rewrite the flush output file. With the fix in this PR, we can end up with a giant file if a lot of memtables are being flushed together. However, the more efficient fix is a bit more complicated to implement (requires associating such pending file numbers with flush job/memtables) and is more risky since it changes normal flush code path.

Pull Request resolved: facebook/rocksdb#11865

Test Plan: * Added repro unit tests.

Reviewed By: anand1976

Differential Revision: D49484922

Pulled By: cbi42

fbshipit-source-id: 25b536c08f4e02e7f1d0f86571663737d2b5d53d
rockeet pushed a commit to topling/toplingdb that referenced this pull request Sep 1, 2024
Summary:
when atomic_flush=false, there are certain cases where we try to install memtable results with already deleted SST files. This can happen when the following sequence events happen:
```
Start Flush0 for memtable M0 to SST0
Start Flush1 for memtable M1 to SST1
Flush 1 returns OK, but don't install to MANIFEST and let whoever flushes M0 to take care of it
Flush0 finishes with a retryable IOError, it rollbacks M0, (incorrectly) does not rollback M1, and deletes SST0 and SST1
Starts Flush2 for M0, it does not pick up M1 since it thought M1 is flushed
Flush2 writes SST2 and finishes OK, tries to install SST2 and SST1
Error opening SST1 since it's already deleted with an  error message like the following:

IO error: No such file or directory: While open a file for random read: /tmp/rocksdbtest-501/db_flush_test_3577_4230653031040984171/000011.sst: No such file or directory
```

This happens since:
1. We currently only rollback the memtables that we are flushing in a flush job when atomic_flush=false.
2. Pending output SSTs from previous flushes are deleted since a pending file number is released whenever a flush job is finished no matter of flush status: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/blob/f42e70bf561d4be9b6bbe7316d1c2c0c8a3818e6/db/db_impl/db_impl_compaction_flush.cc#L3161

This PR fixes the issue by rollback these pending flushes.

There is another issue where if a new flush for new memtable starts and finishes after Flush0 finishes. Its output may also be deleted (see more in unit test). It is fixed by checking bg error status before installing a memtable result, and rollback if there is an error.

There is a more efficient fix where we just don't release the pending file output number for flushes that delegate installation. It is more efficient since it does not have to rewrite the flush output file. With the fix in this PR, we can end up with a giant file if a lot of memtables are being flushed together. However, the more efficient fix is a bit more complicated to implement (requires associating such pending file numbers with flush job/memtables) and is more risky since it changes normal flush code path.

Pull Request resolved: facebook/rocksdb#11865

Test Plan: * Added repro unit tests.

Reviewed By: anand1976

Differential Revision: D49484922

Pulled By: cbi42

fbshipit-source-id: 25b536c08f4e02e7f1d0f86571663737d2b5d53d
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants