Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Exclude StackableDB from transaction stress tests #4132

Closed

Conversation

maysamyabandeh
Copy link
Contributor

@maysamyabandeh maysamyabandeh commented Jul 13, 2018

The transactions are currently tested with and without using StackableDB. This is mostly to check that the code path is consistent with stackable db as well. Slow, stress tests however do not benefit from being run again with StackableDB. The patch excludes StackableDB from such tests.
On a single core it reduced the runtime of transaction_test from 199s to 135s.

Copy link
Contributor

@facebook-github-bot facebook-github-bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@maysamyabandeh has imported this pull request. If you are a Facebook employee, you can view this diff on Phabricator.

Copy link
Contributor

@yiwu-arbug yiwu-arbug left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looking good.

rcane pushed a commit to rcane/rocksdb that referenced this pull request Sep 13, 2018
Summary:
The transactions are currently tested with and without using StackableDB. This is mostly to check that the code path is consistent with stackable db as well. Slow, stress tests however do not benefit from being run again with StackableDB. The patch excludes StackableDB from such tests.
On a single core it reduced the runtime of transaction_test from 199s to 135s.
Pull Request resolved: facebook#4132

Differential Revision: D8841655

Pulled By: maysamyabandeh

fbshipit-source-id: 7b9aaba2673b542b195439dfb306cef26bd63b19
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants