-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.7k
Faiss indexes
The basic indexes are given hereafter:
Method | Class name | index_factory |
Main parameters | Bytes/vector | Exhaustive | Comments |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Exact Search for L2 | IndexFlatL2 |
"Flat" |
d |
4*d |
yes | brute-force |
Exact Search for Inner Product | IndexFlatIP |
"Flat" |
d |
4*d |
yes | also for cosine (normalize vectors beforehand) |
Hierarchical Navigable Small World graph exploration | IndexHNSWFlat |
'HNSWx,Flat` |
d , M
|
4*d + 8 * M |
no | |
Inverted file with exact post-verification | IndexIVFFlat |
"IVFx,Flat" |
quantizer , d , nlists , metric
|
4*d |
no | Take another index to assign vectors to inverted lists |
Locality-Sensitive Hashing (binary flat index) | IndexLSH |
- |
d , nbits
|
nbits/8 |
yes | optimized by using random rotation instead of random projections |
Scalar quantizer (SQ) in flat mode | IndexScalarQuantizer |
"SQ8" |
d |
d |
yes | 4 bit per component is also implemented, but the impact on accuracy may be inacceptable |
Product quantizer (PQ) in flat mode | IndexPQ |
"PQx" |
d , M , nbits
|
M (if nbits=8) |
yes | |
IVF and scalar quantizer | IndexIVFScalarQuantizer |
"IVFx,SQ4" "IVFx,SQ8" |
quantizer , d , nlists , qtype
|
SQfp16: 2 * d , SQ8: d or SQ4: d/2
|
no | there are 2 encodings: 4 bit per dimension and 8 bit per dimension |
IVFADC (coarse quantizer+PQ on residuals) | IndexIVFPQ |
"IVFx,PQy" |
quantizer , d , nlists , M , nbits
|
M+4 or M+8
|
no | the memory cost depends on the data type used to represent ids (int or long), currently supports only nbits <= 8 |
IVFADC+R (same as IVFADC with re-ranking based on codes) | IndexIVFPQR |
"IVFx,PQy+z" |
quantizer , d , nlists , M , nbits , M_refine , nbits_refine
|
M+M_refine+4 or M+M_refine+8
|
no |
The index can be constructed explicitly with the class constructor, or by using index_factory
.
Flat indexes just encode the vectors into codes of a fixed size and store them in an array of ntotal * code_size
bytes.
Flat indexes are similar to C++ vectors. They do not store vector ids, since in many cases sequential numbering is enough. Therefore:
-
they don't support
add_with_id
(but they can be wrapped in anIndexIDMap
to add that functionality). -
they do support efficient direct vector access (with
reconstruct
andreconstruct_n
) -
they support removal with
remove
. Note that this shrinks the index and changes the numbering.
The available encodings are (from least to strongest compression):
- no encoding at all (
IndexFlat
): the vectors are stored without compression; - 16-bit float encoding (
IndexScalarQuantizer
withQT_fp16
): the vectors are compressed to 16-bit floats, which may cause some loss of precision; - 8/6/4-bit integer encoding (
IndexScalarQuantizer
withQT_8bit
/QT_6bit
/QT_4bit
): vectors quantized to 256/64/16 levels; - PQ encoding (
IndexPQ
): vectors are split into sub-vectors that are each quantized to a few bits (usually 8). See the example below.
A typical way to speed-up the process at the cost of loosing the guarantee to find the nearest neighbor is to employ a partitioning technique such as k-means. The corresponding algorithms are sometimes referred to as cell-probe methods.
We use a partition-based method based on Multi-probing (a reminiscent variant of best-bin KD-tree).
- The feature space is partitioned into
nlist
cells. - The database vectors are assigned to one of these cells thanks to a hashing function (in the case of k-means, the assignment to the centroid closest to the query), and stored in an inverted file structure formed of
nlist
inverted lists. - At query time, a set of
nprobe
inverted lists is selected - The query is compared to each of the database vector assigned to these lists.
Doing so, only a fraction of the database is compared to the query: as a first approximation, this fraction is nprobe/nlist
, but this approximation is usually under-estimated because the inverted lists have not equal lengths.
The failure case appears when the cell of the nearest neighbor of a given query is not selected.
The constructor takes an index as a parameter (the quantizer
or coarse quantizer), which is used to do the assignment to the inverted lists. The query is searched in this index, and the returned vector id(s) are the inverted list(s) that should be visited.
Typically, one would use a Flat index as coarse quantizer. The train method of the IndexIVF adds the centroids to the flat index. The nprobe
is specified at query time (useful for measuring trade-offs between speed and accuracy).
NOTE: As a rule of thumb, denoting by n
the number of points to be indexed, a typical way to select the number of centroids is to aim at balancing the cost of the assignment to the centroids (nlist * d
for a plain k-means) with the number of distance computations performed when parsing the inverted lists (in the order of nprobe / nlist * n * C
, where the constant accounts for the uneven distribution of the list and the fact that a single vector comparison is done more efficiently when done by batch with centroids, say C=10 to give an idea). This leads to a number of centroids of the form nlist = C * sqrt (n)
.
In some contexts it is beneficial to use other types of quantizers, for example a GPU based quantizer, a MultiIndexQuantizer
or a HNSW based quantizer.
The elements of inverted lists are encoded vectors (+ the corresponding vector id). The encoding is mainly to make the vectors more compact. Those elements are just scanned sequentially, and the search function returns the top-k smallest distances seen so far.
The supported codes are the same as for the Flat index, just convert the name of the index class by inserting IVF
: IndexFlat
becomes IndexIVFFlat
.
The most popular cell-probe method is probably the original Locality Sensitive Hashing method referred to as [E2LSH] (http://www.mit.edu/~andoni/LSH/). However this method and its derivatives suffer from two drawbacks:
- They require a lot of hash functions (=partitions) to achieve acceptable results, leading to a lot of extra memory. Memory is not cheap.
- The hash function are not adapted to the input data. This is good for proofs but leads to suboptimal choice results in practice.
In C++, a LSH index (binary vector mode, See Charikar STOC'2002) is declared as follows:
IndexLSH * index = new faiss::IndexLSH (d, nbits);
where d
is the input vector dimensionality and nbits
the number of bits use per stored vector.
In Python, the (improved) LSH index is constructed and search as follows
n_bits = 2 * d
lsh = faiss.IndexLSH (d, n_bits)
lsh.train (x_train)
lsh.add (x_base)
D, I = lsh.search (x_query, k)
NOTE: The algorithm is not vanilla-LSH, but a better choice. Instead of set of orthogonal projectors is used if n_bits <= d, or a tight frame if n_bits > d.
In C++, the indexes based on product quantization are identified by the keyword PQ. For instance, the most common indexes based on product quantization are declared as follows:
#include <faiss/IndexPQ.h>
#include <faiss/IndexIVFPQ.h>
// Define a product quantizer for vectors of dimensionality d=128,
// with 8 bits per subquantizer and M=16 distinct subquantizer
size_t d = 128;
int M = 16;
int nbits = 8;
faiss:IndexPQ * index_pq = new faiss::IndexPQ (d, M, nbits);
// Define an index using both PQ and an inverted file with nlists to avoid exhaustive search
// The index 'quantizer' must be already declared
faiss::IndexIVFPQ * ivfpq = new faiss::IndexIVFPQ (quantizer, d, nlists, M, nbits);
// Same but with another level of refinement
faiss::IndexIVFPQR * ivfpqr = new faiss::IndexIVFPQR (quantizer, d, nclust, M, nbits, M_refine, nbits);
In Python, a product quantizer is defined by:
m = 16 # number of subquantizers
n_bits = 8 # bits allocated per subquantizer
pq = faiss.IndexPQ (d, m, n_bits) # Create the index
pq.train (x_train) # Training
pq.add (x_base) # Populate the index
D, I = pq.search (x_query, k) # Perform a search
The number of bits n_bits
must be equal to 8, 12 or 16. The dimension d
should be a multiple of m
The IndexIVFPQ
is probably the most useful indexing structure for large-scale search. It is used like
coarse_quantizer = faiss.IndexFlatL2 (d)
index = faiss.IndexIVFPQ (coarse_quantizer, d,
ncentroids, code_size, 8)
index.nprobe = 5
See the chapter about IndexIVFFlat
for the setting of ncentroids
. The code_size
is typically a power of two between 4 and 64. Like for IndexPQ
, d
should be a multiple of m
.
Faiss building blocks: clustering, PCA, quantization
Index IO, cloning and hyper parameter tuning
Threads and asynchronous calls
Inverted list objects and scanners
Indexes that do not fit in RAM
Brute force search without an index
Fast accumulation of PQ and AQ codes (FastScan)
Setting search parameters for one query
Binary hashing index benchmark