feat: ✨ Validator Documentation for Dev + Staging site mention for Zenodo Sandbox API #28
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Thank you for submitting this pull request! We appreciate your contribution to the project. Before we can merge it, we need to review the changes you've made to ensure they align with our code standards and meet the requirements of the project. We'll get back to you as soon as we can with feedback. Thanks again! |
Contributor
Reviewer's GuideThis PR enriches the Codefair docs by refining the bot tutorial, adding a staging-site Zenodo Sandbox API tip, updating the sidebar navigation, and introducing a comprehensive Validator microservice guide. Sequence diagram for JSON file validation via the Validator MicroservicesequenceDiagram
participant Client
participant ValidatorMicroservice as /validate-json
participant ValidateJSON_Resource as ValidateJSON Resource
participant JsonValidator_Instance as JsonValidator
Client->>ValidatorMicroservice: POST /validate-json (file_path)
ValidatorMicroservice->>ValidateJSON_Resource: Handle request(payload)
ValidateJSON_Resource->>ValidateJSON_Resource: args = api.payload or {}
ValidateJSON_Resource->>ValidateJSON_Resource: file_path = args.get('file_path')
alt file_path provided and valid
ValidateJSON_Resource->>ValidateJSON_Resource: Input validation (e.g., path traversal)
ValidateJSON_Resource->>JsonValidator_Instance: new JsonValidator()
ValidateJSON_Resource->>JsonValidator_Instance: validate(file_path)
JsonValidator_Instance-->>ValidateJSON_Resource: result (valid, message)
alt result.get('valid') is true
ValidateJSON_Resource-->>ValidatorMicroservice: Response(200, {'message': 'valid', 'details': result['message']})
else result.get('valid') is false
ValidateJSON_Resource-->>ValidatorMicroservice: Response(400, {'message': 'invalid', 'error': result['message']})
end
else file_path not provided or invalid
ValidateJSON_Resource-->>ValidatorMicroservice: Response(400, {'message': 'Validation Error', 'error': 'file_path is required or invalid'})
end
ValidatorMicroservice-->>Client: HTTP Response
Class diagram for the new Validator endpoint exampleclassDiagram
class Resource {
<<Flask-RESTX>>
# Base class for API resources
}
class ValidateJSON {
+post(self) : Response
}
class JsonValidator {
+validate(file_path: str) : dict
}
Resource <|-- ValidateJSON
ValidateJSON ..> JsonValidator : creates and uses
File-Level Changes
Tips and commandsInteracting with Sourcery
Customizing Your ExperienceAccess your dashboard to:
Getting Help
|
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
|
|
Thanks for making updates to your pull request. Our team will take a look and provide feedback as soon as possible. Please wait for any GitHub Actions to complete before editing your pull request. If you have any additional questions or concerns, feel free to let us know. Thank you for your contributions! |
![sourcery-ai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/48477?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Hey @slugb0t - I've reviewed your changes and they look great!
Here's what I looked at during the review
- 🟡 General issues: 3 issues found
- 🟢 Security: all looks good
- 🟢 Testing: all looks good
- 🟢 Documentation: all looks good
Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment and I'll use the feedback to improve your reviews.
docs/dev/validator.md
Outdated
Comment on lines
3
to
8
| title: Running Locally | ||
| description: Runnning the Codefair GitHub repository locally | ||
| head: | ||
| - - meta | ||
| - name: og:image | ||
| content: https://kalai.fairdataihub.org/api/generate?title=Codefair%20Documentation&description=Running%20the%20GitHub%20Repository&app=codefair&org=fairdataihub |
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
issue: Frontmatter metadata mismatch with page content.
Update the frontmatter fields to match the actual page content about adding a validation endpoint.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull Request Overview
This PR enhances developer documentation by introducing a new validator guide, refining the bot tutorial, surfacing the validator docs in the sidebar, and mentioning the Zenodo sandbox on the staging site.
- Add a tip about using the Zenodo Sandbox API on the staging site
- Create a dedicated guide for adding validation endpoints to the microservice
- Refine the bot tutorial to append results to an object and generate clickable badges
- Update the sidebar to include the new Validation Feature link
Reviewed Changes
Copilot reviewed 4 out of 4 changed files in this pull request and generated 1 comment.
| File | Description |
|---|---|
| docs/docs/archive.md | Added a tip about the Zenodo Sandbox API usage on the staging site |
| docs/dev/validator.md | Introduced a guide for adding validation endpoints to the microservice |
| docs/dev/bot.md | Refined bot tutorial wording to append results to an object and badge usage |
| docs/.vitepress/config.js | Surfaced the validator docs link under the developer sidebar |
Comments suppressed due to low confidence (2)
docs/dev/validator.md:4
- Frontmatter 'description' has a spelling error: 'Runnning' should be 'Running'.
description: Runnning the Codefair GitHub repository locally
docs/dev/validator.md:3
- Frontmatter title and description don't match the guide content about adding a validation endpoint. Consider updating them to reflect endpoint integration.
title: Running Locally
Co-authored-by: sourcery-ai[bot] <58596630+sourcery-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
|
Thanks for closing this pull request! If you have any further questions, please feel free to open a new issue. We are always happy to help! |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary by Sourcery
Update and expand documentation: refine bot compliance tutorial, add a validator microservice guide, include a Zenodo sandbox tip, and surface the new validator docs in the sidebar.
Enhancements:
Documentation: