-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 929
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add new notations module for science #2416
Comments
Thank you for your feature proposal. We marked it as "waiting for user interest" for now to gather some feedback from our community:
We would also like to hear about other community members' use cases for the feature to give us a better understanding of their potential implicit or explicit requirements. We will start the implementation based on:
We do this because:
|
What is the difference between this and faker.science.unit? |
@ST-DDT |
i would call things like force, pressure, area "quantities" https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Physical_quantity - the notation is just the symbol. |
export interface Notation {
/**
* The long version of the notations (e.g. `work`).
*/
name: string;
/**
* The short version/abbreviation of the notations (e.g. `w`)
*/
symbol: string;
} However, one notation can refer to more than one meaning.( e.g. uppercase C can refer capacitance, heat capacity and constant of integration ) |
I would wait for more upvotes. One of the reason to wait for 10+ upvotes is to get a variety of opinions over what use cases people might need this for. That informs making sensible naming decisions. I don't use the science module in any of my projects, but if we can find 10 people who do over a few months, they'd have a much better idea of how to structure the api. |
I agree with this--- "notation" is too similar to "unit", so if we implement it, we should name this method "quantity". |
Clear and concise description of the problem
Add notations module to science so that we could use symbol to express units in science
Suggested solution
According to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_common_physics_notations
Alternative
No response
Additional context
No response
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: