docs: fixed inconsitency in @see usage in jsdoc

[hankucz]

No description provided.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #1224 (7171c92) into main (5979f82) will increase coverage by 0.00%.
The diff coverage is 78.57%.

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #1224   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   99.62%   99.62%           
=======================================
  Files        2155     2155           
  Lines      236900   236900           
  Branches      990      991    +1     
=======================================
+ Hits       236012   236015    +3     
+ Misses        867      864    -3     
  Partials       21       21           

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
src/definitions/finance.ts	0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
src/definitions/hacker.ts	0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
src/definitions/phone_number.ts	0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
src/modules/address/index.ts	99.81% <100.00%> (ø)
src/modules/company/index.ts	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
src/modules/image/providers/unsplash.ts	95.32% <100.00%> (ø)
src/modules/phone/index.ts	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
src/modules/internet/user-agent.ts	82.53% <0.00%> (+0.79%)	⬆️

[ST-DDT]

I'm not sure whether all methods need the empty ().

[Shinigami92]

I'm not sure whether all methods need the empty ().

How did we do it in the rest of the codebase and if it's mixed please let us decide one, document that and use it consistently

Maybe your magic hands can even write a test for that?

[ST-DDT]

I will write a test after this PR is merged.