-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 920
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Cut 0.28.2 release #1653
Comments
@maxgio92: The label(s) In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
@maxgio92: You must be a member of the falcosecurity/maintainers GitHub team to set the milestone. If you believe you should be able to issue the /milestone command, please contact your Falco maintainers and have them propose you as an additional delegate for this responsibility. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
Update: The last PR for cutting 0.28.2 is ready to be reviewed 👇 TODO: |
Thanks @leogr. Updated the checklist in this issue's description. |
I'm going to prepare DBG configurations test-infra #398 |
@maxgio92: GitHub didn't allow me to assign the following users: zuc. Note that only falcosecurity members, repo collaborators and people who have commented on this issue/PR can be assigned. Additionally, issues/PRs can only have 10 assignees at the same time. |
hello 👋 |
Update: Drivers have been built with success, not published yet (test-infra #398). |
Update:
|
Update:
|
Update:
|
Update:
We can start the release! (I'll start with pre checks) |
Update:
|
Update:
|
Update:
|
Update:
|
Also:
|
Patch ready: #1662 |
Since the Falco 0.29.0 milestone is due on June, 09th... Would not make more sense to fix this in |
Cannot the 0.29.0 be postponed? Just a question to have different alternatives in case. |
So, we should postpone an official, and with a fixed cadence, Falco release only to release a hotfix version (0.28.2, patch level) that itself needs to patch the current libs and driver versions at build time? Doesn't sound very correct to me, but that's just my opinion :) |
Both options are fine to me. Do we all agree in dismissing the If so, we have to:
That's totally fine. Please confirm! |
Sorry @leodido I didn't get the point that the 0.29.0 has been actually planned, you're right in my opinion. In that case I agree with you all to dismiss 0.28.2 in favor of 0.29.0. |
Closing since we agreeed to cut 0.29.0 directly. |
@fntlnz: Closing this issue. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
Scheduled to happen: > 2021-05-16, < 2021-06-09
This is a patch release. We can make the release happen as the features are merged.
Release Steps
Process is described in this document: https://github.com/falcosecurity/falco/blob/master/RELEASE.md
Release Blocking Features
Action Items
Open Questions
/milestone 0.28.2
/assign @maxgio92 @leogr @zuc
/kind documentation
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: