Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(scripts): use falco-driver-loader only into install scripts #2391

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 31, 2023

Conversation

Andreagit97
Copy link
Member

What type of PR is this?

/kind bug

Any specific area of the project related to this PR?

/area build

What this PR does / why we need it:

This PR reverts part of 7a794b70a71896a3eb1971ca66cc0c19b9a104e6: the falco-driver-loader should be used only in installation scripts otherwise we need separate units with high privileged to download/compile drivers

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

Special notes for your reviewer:

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?:

fix(scripts): use falco-driver-loader only into install scripts

Signed-off-by: Andrea Terzolo <andrea.terzolo@polito.it>
@Andreagit97
Copy link
Member Author

/hold

Copy link
Contributor

@FedeDP FedeDP left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I agree with this solution; only downside: if kernel gets upgraded, users using falco-bpf should manually refresh the probe by running falco-driver-loader bpf again

@FedeDP
Copy link
Contributor

FedeDP commented Jan 30, 2023

/cc @leogr

@FedeDP
Copy link
Contributor

FedeDP commented Jan 30, 2023

/milestone 0.34.0

@poiana poiana added this to the 0.34.0 milestone Jan 30, 2023
@Andreagit97 Andreagit97 mentioned this pull request Jan 30, 2023
48 tasks
@Andreagit97
Copy link
Member Author

yeah, I think that actual systemd units won't be the final ones, we need to find a better solution probably in Falco 0.35 for this reason I would avoid adding new units if we are not sure to maintain them in the next releases

@poiana
Copy link
Contributor

poiana commented Jan 31, 2023

LGTM label has been added.

Git tree hash: 5a63c05b7d548ad7a3776b2e031ec329c4634217

Copy link
Contributor

@FedeDP FedeDP left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/approve

@poiana
Copy link
Contributor

poiana commented Jan 31, 2023

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: Andreagit97, FedeDP, jasondellaluce

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
  • OWNERS [Andreagit97,FedeDP,jasondellaluce]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@jasondellaluce
Copy link
Contributor

/unhold

@poiana poiana merged commit 7ebf4b8 into master Jan 31, 2023
@poiana poiana deleted the fix_bpf_unit branch January 31, 2023 13:48
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants