Added the OpenSSF Scorecard Badge #3250
Conversation
Signed-off-by: harshitasao <harshitasao@gmail.com>
|
Welcome @harshitasao! It looks like this is your first PR to falcosecurity/falco 🎉 |
poiana
added
size/XS
release-note-none
and removed
do-not-merge/release-note-label-needed
labels
|
Thank you! I have just a question, if you look at the preview this OpenSSF badge style looks different from the other OpenSSF badge we already have, is it possible to apply the same style to both? Thanks! |
|
/milestone 0.39.0 |
I guess we have just to add @harshitasao could you address that please? 🙏 |
Signed-off-by: harshitasao <harshitasao@gmail.com>
|
Sorry for the delay. I have styled the badge as mentioned and converted the scorecard link from JSON to Standard (human readable) format. |
|
LGTM label has been added. Git tree hash: c40492878062519acdc0bbfbd0d1a400b5b3facf
|
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: FedeDP, harshitasao, LucaGuerra The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
What type of PR is this?
/kind documentation
What this PR does / why we need it:
This PR adds OpenSSF Scorecard Badge in the README file.
The project already has the Scorecard GitHub Action running, so adding the scorecard badge would be quite handy. So that the results can be shown as a badge in the repository's README. This badge serves as a quick indicator of the project's security posture, helping users and contributors evaluate the project's security practices quickly.
Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
Fixes #
Special notes for your reviewer: N/A
Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?: N/A