Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

PolicyReport: determine resource name also from ka.resp.name #358

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 29, 2022
Merged

PolicyReport: determine resource name also from ka.resp.name #358

merged 1 commit into from
Aug 29, 2022

Conversation

fjogeleit
Copy link
Member

Signed-off-by: Frank Jogeleit frank.jogeleit@web.de

What type of PR is this?

Uncomment one (or more) /kind <> lines:

/kind bug

/kind cleanup

/kind design

/kind documentation

/kind failing-test

/kind feature

Any specific area of the project related to this PR?

Uncomment one (or more) /area <> lines:

/area build

/area config

/area outputs

/area tests

What this PR does / why we need it:

Also determine the resource name from ka.resp.name, if ka.target.name is not available.

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

Fixes #

Special notes for your reviewer:

Signed-off-by: Frank Jogeleit <frank.jogeleit@web.de>
@poiana
Copy link

poiana commented Aug 29, 2022

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: fjogeleit, Issif

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@poiana
Copy link

poiana commented Aug 29, 2022

LGTM label has been added.

Git tree hash: 41d7249aa4ede00ee2af025accd5226a5ec1070b

@Issif Issif added this to the 2.27.0 milestone Aug 29, 2022
@poiana poiana merged commit f9be9de into falcosecurity:master Aug 29, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
Status: Done
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants