fix(artifact): do not run artifact installs in parallel #28
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Signed-off-by: Luca Guerra <luca@guerra.sh>
Andreagit97
approved these changes
Sep 22, 2023
|
LGTM label has been added. Git tree hash: 4ab678810a1d525570f4045ca23524af7a5ce134
|
|
/hold |
|
let's see if they pass at least here |
|
I ran them 3 times and did not fail. Far from being an exhaustive test though 😂 |
leogr
approved these changes
Sep 22, 2023
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: Andreagit97, leogr, LucaGuerra The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
|
/unhold |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I believe we are hitting this race condition: sigstore/cosign#2576
Meaning that if we disable parallel runs for those jobs this may get better. I'm not sure if the
t.Parallel()above those functions should be removed as well.