Adaptation to 96TS in import NTC2 #207
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes involve significant updates to the Changes
Poem
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 5
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (6)
cse-cc-import-runner-app/src/test/resources/com/farao_community/farao/cse/import_runner/app/services/NTC2_20210624_2D5_FR-IT1-test.xml (1)
Line range hint
17-119: Critical: Time interval mismatch with number of intervalsThere's an inconsistency in the time intervals:
- The
TimeIntervalinPeriodtag specifies "2021-06-23T23:00Z/2021-06-24T01:00Z" (2-hour period)- However, 24 intervals are defined, each representing an hour with PT60M resolution
- This mismatch could cause issues in production where accurate time mapping is crucial
Fix the
TimeIntervalto match the number of intervals:- <TimeInterval v="2021-06-23T23:00Z/2021-06-24T01:00Z" /> + <TimeInterval v="2021-06-23T23:00Z/2021-06-24T23:00Z" />cse-cc-import-runner-app/src/test/resources/com/farao_community/farao/cse/import_runner/app/services/NTC2_20210624_2D5_SI-IT1-test.xml (1)
Line range hint
12-119: Fix inconsistency between TimeInterval and number of intervalsThere's a mismatch between the defined TimeInterval and the number of intervals:
- TimeInterval specifies "2021-06-23T23:00Z/2021-06-24T01:00Z" (2-hour period)
- Resolution is "PT60M" (1 hour)
- 24 intervals are defined
This is inconsistent as a 2-hour period should only contain 2 intervals with the given resolution.
Please either:
- Adjust the TimeInterval to match the 24 intervals:
- <TimeInterval v="2021-06-23T23:00Z/2021-06-24T01:00Z" /> + <TimeInterval v="2021-06-23T23:00Z/2021-06-24T23:00Z" />
- Or reduce the number of intervals to match the 2-hour period.
cse-cc-import-runner-app/src/test/resources/com/farao_community/farao/cse/import_runner/app/services/NTC2_20210624_2D5_AT-IT1-test.xml (1)
Line range hint
10-10: Fix inconsistency between TimeInterval and number of intervalsThere's a critical mismatch between the declared time interval and the actual data:
- The
CapacityTimeIntervalspans 24 hours:2021-06-23T23:00Z/2021-06-24T23:00Z- But the
Period/TimeIntervalonly spans 2 hours:2021-06-23T23:00Z/2021-06-24T01:00Z- Yet the data contains 24 hourly intervals
This inconsistency could cause runtime issues in production.
Update the Period's TimeInterval to match the full 24-hour span:
- <TimeInterval v="2021-06-23T23:00Z/2021-06-24T01:00Z" /> + <TimeInterval v="2021-06-23T23:00Z/2021-06-24T23:00Z" />Also applies to: 36-119
cse-cc-import-runner-app/src/main/java/com/farao_community/farao/cse/import_runner/app/util/Ntc2Util.java (1)
52-58: Use constants for interval sizes to improve readability and maintainabilityReplacing magic numbers with named constants can enhance code clarity and make future modifications easier.
Apply this diff to introduce constants:
+ private static final int INTERVALS_PER_DAY_96 = 96; + private static final int INTERVALS_PER_DAY_24 = 24; ... if (qtyByPositionMap.size() == INTERVALS_PER_DAY_96) { // existing logic } else if (qtyByPositionMap.size() == INTERVALS_PER_DAY_24) { // existing logic } else { // existing logic }cse-cc-import-runner-app/src/test/resources/com/farao_community/farao/cse/import_runner/app/services/NTC2_20210624_2D5_CH-IT1-test.xml (1)
Line range hint
22-24: Correct theTimeIntervalto match the number of intervals definedThe
<TimeInterval>is set to a 2-hour period, but there are 24 intervals defined with a resolution of 1 hour. This inconsistency can lead to incorrect mapping of intervals to time slots.Adjust the
TimeIntervalto cover the full range of intervals:- <TimeInterval v="2021-06-23T23:00Z/2021-06-24T01:00Z" /> + <TimeInterval v="2021-06-23T23:00Z/2021-06-24T23:00Z" />cse-cc-import-runner-app/src/test/java/com/farao_community/farao/cse/import_runner/app/services/FileImporterTest.java (1)
201-201: Avoid asserting on exact exception messages to reduce brittlenessAsserting exact exception messages can make tests fragile. If the message changes, even slightly, the test will fail. Consider asserting on the exception type or checking that the message contains key information.
Update the assertion to check for relevant content:
- assertEquals("CapacityTimeSeries contains 7 intervals which is different to 24 or 96", nestedE.getMessage()); + assertTrue(nestedE.getMessage().contains("CapacityTimeSeries contains"));
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (14)
cse-cc-import-runner-app/src/main/java/com/farao_community/farao/cse/import_runner/app/util/Ntc2Util.java(3 hunks)cse-cc-import-runner-app/src/test/java/com/farao_community/farao/cse/import_runner/app/services/FileImporterTest.java(3 hunks)cse-cc-import-runner-app/src/test/resources/com/farao_community/farao/cse/import_runner/app/services/NTC2_20210624_2D5_AT-IT1-test-96.xml(1 hunks)cse-cc-import-runner-app/src/test/resources/com/farao_community/farao/cse/import_runner/app/services/NTC2_20210624_2D5_AT-IT1-test-missing-intervals.xml(1 hunks)cse-cc-import-runner-app/src/test/resources/com/farao_community/farao/cse/import_runner/app/services/NTC2_20210624_2D5_AT-IT1-test.xml(1 hunks)cse-cc-import-runner-app/src/test/resources/com/farao_community/farao/cse/import_runner/app/services/NTC2_20210624_2D5_CH-IT1-test-96.xml(1 hunks)cse-cc-import-runner-app/src/test/resources/com/farao_community/farao/cse/import_runner/app/services/NTC2_20210624_2D5_CH-IT1-test-missing-intervals.xml(1 hunks)cse-cc-import-runner-app/src/test/resources/com/farao_community/farao/cse/import_runner/app/services/NTC2_20210624_2D5_CH-IT1-test.xml(1 hunks)cse-cc-import-runner-app/src/test/resources/com/farao_community/farao/cse/import_runner/app/services/NTC2_20210624_2D5_FR-IT1-test-96.xml(1 hunks)cse-cc-import-runner-app/src/test/resources/com/farao_community/farao/cse/import_runner/app/services/NTC2_20210624_2D5_FR-IT1-test-missing-intervals.xml(1 hunks)cse-cc-import-runner-app/src/test/resources/com/farao_community/farao/cse/import_runner/app/services/NTC2_20210624_2D5_FR-IT1-test.xml(1 hunks)cse-cc-import-runner-app/src/test/resources/com/farao_community/farao/cse/import_runner/app/services/NTC2_20210624_2D5_SI-IT1-test-96.xml(1 hunks)cse-cc-import-runner-app/src/test/resources/com/farao_community/farao/cse/import_runner/app/services/NTC2_20210624_2D5_SI-IT1-test-missing-intervals.xml(1 hunks)cse-cc-import-runner-app/src/test/resources/com/farao_community/farao/cse/import_runner/app/services/NTC2_20210624_2D5_SI-IT1-test.xml(1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (6)
- cse-cc-import-runner-app/src/test/resources/com/farao_community/farao/cse/import_runner/app/services/NTC2_20210624_2D5_FR-IT1-test-96.xml
- cse-cc-import-runner-app/src/test/resources/com/farao_community/farao/cse/import_runner/app/services/NTC2_20210624_2D5_AT-IT1-test-missing-intervals.xml
- cse-cc-import-runner-app/src/test/resources/com/farao_community/farao/cse/import_runner/app/services/NTC2_20210624_2D5_CH-IT1-test-96.xml
- cse-cc-import-runner-app/src/test/resources/com/farao_community/farao/cse/import_runner/app/services/NTC2_20210624_2D5_AT-IT1-test-96.xml
- cse-cc-import-runner-app/src/test/resources/com/farao_community/farao/cse/import_runner/app/services/NTC2_20210624_2D5_FR-IT1-test-missing-intervals.xml
- cse-cc-import-runner-app/src/test/resources/com/farao_community/farao/cse/import_runner/app/services/NTC2_20210624_2D5_CH-IT1-test-missing-intervals.xml
🔇 Additional comments (7)
cse-cc-import-runner-app/src/test/resources/com/farao_community/farao/cse/import_runner/app/services/NTC2_20210624_2D5_FR-IT1-test.xml (1)
36-119: Verify the quantity pattern for new intervals
The newly added intervals 4-24 all have the same quantity value of 99, while the first three intervals have varying values (111, 557, 4096). While this might be intentional for testing, please verify:
- If this pattern is suitable for the test scenario
- If it provides adequate coverage for edge cases
- If it aligns with the test objectives mentioned in PR description about "Adaptation to 96TS"
✅ Verification successful
Based on the shell script results, I can now generate a final response as the pattern is clear across multiple test files.
Quantity pattern of 99 is consistent with test design
The search across all similar test files reveals a consistent pattern where:
- Each test file has unique values for the first 3 intervals (e.g., FR-IT1: 111,557,4096; AT-IT1: 399,488,1024; SI-IT1: 111,669,8192)
- All subsequent intervals use 99 as a standard test value
- This pattern is maintained across regular, 96TS (-96 suffix), and missing-intervals test variations
This consistent pattern across all test files indicates it's an intentional test design choice where:
- The first 3 intervals test unique/edge cases with specific values
- The remaining intervals use a common value (99) to verify basic interval handling
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for similar test files to compare quantity patterns
fd -e xml -x grep -l "Qty.*99" {} \; | while read -r file; do
echo "=== $file ==="
grep -A 1 "<Qty" "$file" | head -n 10
done
Length of output: 8421
cse-cc-import-runner-app/src/test/resources/com/farao_community/farao/cse/import_runner/app/services/NTC2_20210624_2D5_SI-IT1-test.xml (1)
36-119: Review test data pattern for realistic scenarios
The newly added intervals (4-24) all use a uniform quantity value of 99, while the original intervals (1-3) have varying quantities (111, 669, 8192). While this might be suitable for basic testing, consider:
- Adding test cases with varying quantities to better represent real-world scenarios
- Adding edge cases (e.g., zero or negative quantities) to test boundary conditions
Let's verify if there are other test files with similar patterns:
cse-cc-import-runner-app/src/test/resources/com/farao_community/farao/cse/import_runner/app/services/NTC2_20210624_2D5_SI-IT1-test-missing-intervals.xml (3)
33-34: Verify the validity of extreme capacity value
The quantity value of 8192 MAW in position 3 appears unusually high compared to other values (mostly 99 MAW). Please verify if this is an expected test case value.
✅ Verification successful
High capacity values are expected in test files
Looking at the search results, the value of 8192 MAW appears consistently in multiple SI-IT1 test files, and other test files show similar power-of-2 values:
- SI-IT1 test files: 8192 MAW
- FR-IT1 test files: 4096 MAW
- CH-IT1 test files: 2048 MAW
- AT-IT1 test files: 1024 MAW
These consistent power-of-2 values across different test files indicate they are intentionally chosen test values, likely to verify system behavior with different magnitudes of capacity.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for similar quantity patterns in other test files
rg "<Qty v=\"[0-9]{4,}\"" --type xml
Length of output: 10105
22-23:
Time interval and data points mismatch needs investigation
The time interval specified ("2021-06-23T23:00Z/2021-06-24T01:00Z") spans 2 hours, but the file contains 18 intervals with hourly resolution (PT60M). This appears to be inconsistent with the expected data structure.
Also applies to: 24-95
37-95: Consider documenting the significance of repeated value
Multiple intervals (positions 4-18) contain the same quantity value (99). If this is intentional test data, consider adding a comment in the test class explaining the significance of this pattern.
cse-cc-import-runner-app/src/main/java/com/farao_community/farao/cse/import_runner/app/util/Ntc2Util.java (1)
13-13: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider using specific time zones instead of 'CET' to handle daylight saving time accurately
The use of 'CET' as a time zone ID can be ambiguous during daylight saving time transitions. It's recommended to use a specific time zone like 'Europe/Paris' or 'Europe/Berlin' to ensure correct time calculations.
Apply this diff to update the time zone:
- ZonedDateTime targetDateInCETZone = targetDateTime.atZoneSameInstant(ZoneId.of("CET"));
+ ZonedDateTime targetDateInCETZone = targetDateTime.atZoneSameInstant(ZoneId.of("Europe/Paris"));Likely invalid or redundant comment.
cse-cc-import-runner-app/src/test/java/com/farao_community/farao/cse/import_runner/app/services/FileImporterTest.java (1)
143-143: Verify the correctness of the time zone conversion in the test
The comment indicates that 2021-06-24T00:30Z is 02:30 in CET, but CET is typically UTC+1. During daylight saving time, it becomes CEST (UTC+2). Ensure that the time conversion aligns with the expected time zone.
Run the following script to confirm the time zone conversion:
✅ Verification successful
The time zone conversion in the comment is correct
The code in DateTimeUtil.java confirms that the application consistently uses CET (Central European Time) zone, and the time conversion in the comment is accurate. During June 24, 2021, CET was in daylight saving time (CEST, UTC+2), so 00:30 UTC correctly converts to 02:30 CEST.
This is evidenced by:
- The codebase consistently uses
ZoneId.of("CET")which automatically handles daylight saving time - The Ntc2Util class specifically converts target times to CET zone for processing using
atZoneSameInstant(ZoneId.of("CET"))
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify time zone conversion between UTC and CET for the given date.
# Expected output: 02:30 if CET is UTC+2 on the given date.
date -d '2021-06-24T00:30Z' '+%Y-%m-%d %H:%M %Z' --utc
date -d '2021-06-24T00:30Z' '+%Y-%m-%d %H:%M %Z' --timezone='Europe/Paris'
Length of output: 240
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's search for any other time zone related tests or configurations in the codebase
rg -l "T00:30Z|CET|CEST|TimeZone" --type java
# Also search for any time zone related constants or configurations
ast-grep --pattern 'ZoneId.$_' --lang java
ast-grep --pattern 'ZoneOffset.$_' --lang java
Length of output: 538
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's examine the content of DateTimeUtil.java which might contain timezone definitions
cat "cse-lib/data/src/main/java/com/farao_community/farao/cse/data/DateTimeUtil.java"
# And check the Ntc2Util for any timezone handling
cat "cse-cc-import-runner-app/src/main/java/com/farao_community/farao/cse/import_runner/app/util/Ntc2Util.java"
Length of output: 7343
| <?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?> | ||
| <CapacityDocument xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="capacity-document.xsd" DtdVersion="4" DtdRelease="0"> | ||
| <DocumentIdentification v="NTC2_20221202_2D5_AT-IT-test" /> | ||
| <DocumentVersion v="1" /> | ||
| <DocumentType v="A31" /> | ||
| <ProcessType v="A01" /> | ||
| <SenderIdentification v="testsender" codingScheme="A01" /> | ||
| <SenderRole v="A04" /> | ||
| <ReceiverIdentification v="testrecceiver" codingScheme="A01" /> | ||
| <ReceiverRole v="A04" /> | ||
| <CreationDateTime v="2022-12-01T06:07:03Z" /> | ||
| <CapacityTimeInterval v="2021-06-23T23:00Z/2021-06-24T23:00Z" /> | ||
| <Domain v="testdomain" codingScheme="A01" /> | ||
| <CapacityTimeSeries> | ||
| <TimeSeriesIdentification v="20221202-0001" /> | ||
| <BusinessType v="A27" /> | ||
| <Product v="8716867000016"/> | ||
| <InArea v="10YIT-GRTN-----B" codingScheme="A01"/> | ||
| <OutArea v="10YSI-ELES-----O" codingScheme="A01"/> | ||
| <MeasureUnit v="MAW" /> | ||
| <Period> | ||
| <TimeInterval v="2021-06-23T23:00Z/2021-06-24T01:00Z" /> | ||
| <Resolution v="PT60M" /> | ||
| <Interval> | ||
| <Pos v="1" /> | ||
| <Qty v="111" /> | ||
| </Interval> | ||
| <Interval> | ||
| <Pos v="2" /> | ||
| <Qty v="669" /> | ||
| </Interval> | ||
| <Interval> | ||
| <Pos v="3" /> | ||
| <Qty v="8192" /> | ||
| </Interval> | ||
| <Interval> | ||
| <Pos v="4" /> | ||
| <Qty v="99" /> | ||
| </Interval> | ||
| <Interval> | ||
| <Pos v="5" /> | ||
| <Qty v="99" /> | ||
| </Interval> | ||
| <Interval> | ||
| <Pos v="6" /> | ||
| <Qty v="99" /> | ||
| </Interval> | ||
| <Interval> | ||
| <Pos v="7" /> | ||
| <Qty v="99" /> | ||
| </Interval> | ||
| <Interval> | ||
| <Pos v="8" /> | ||
| <Qty v="99" /> | ||
| </Interval> | ||
| <Interval> | ||
| <Pos v="9" /> | ||
| <Qty v="99" /> | ||
| </Interval> | ||
| <Interval> | ||
| <Pos v="10" /> | ||
| <Qty v="99" /> | ||
| </Interval> | ||
| <Interval> | ||
| <Pos v="11" /> | ||
| <Qty v="99" /> | ||
| </Interval> | ||
| <Interval> | ||
| <Pos v="12" /> | ||
| <Qty v="99" /> | ||
| </Interval> | ||
| <Interval> | ||
| <Pos v="13" /> | ||
| <Qty v="99" /> | ||
| </Interval> | ||
| <Interval> | ||
| <Pos v="14" /> | ||
| <Qty v="99" /> | ||
| </Interval> | ||
| <Interval> | ||
| <Pos v="15" /> | ||
| <Qty v="99" /> | ||
| </Interval> | ||
| <Interval> | ||
| <Pos v="16" /> | ||
| <Qty v="99" /> | ||
| </Interval> | ||
| <Interval> | ||
| <Pos v="17" /> | ||
| <Qty v="99" /> | ||
| </Interval> | ||
| <Interval> | ||
| <Pos v="18" /> | ||
| <Qty v="99" /> | ||
| </Interval> | ||
| </Period> | ||
| </CapacityTimeSeries> | ||
| </CapacityDocument> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Filename suggests missing intervals but all intervals are present
The filename contains "missing-intervals" but the XML contains a complete sequence of intervals from 1 to 18. This inconsistency between the filename and content might lead to confusion in test scenarios.
Consider either:
- Removing some intervals to match the filename's implication
- Renaming the file to better reflect its actual content
| <Interval> | ||
| <Pos v="4" /> | ||
| <Qty v="99" /> | ||
| </Interval> | ||
| <Interval> | ||
| <Pos v="5" /> | ||
| <Qty v="99" /> | ||
| </Interval> | ||
| <Interval> | ||
| <Pos v="6" /> | ||
| <Qty v="99" /> | ||
| </Interval> | ||
| <Interval> | ||
| <Pos v="7" /> | ||
| <Qty v="99" /> | ||
| </Interval> | ||
| <Interval> | ||
| <Pos v="8" /> | ||
| <Qty v="99" /> | ||
| </Interval> | ||
| <Interval> | ||
| <Pos v="9" /> | ||
| <Qty v="99" /> | ||
| </Interval> | ||
| <Interval> | ||
| <Pos v="10" /> | ||
| <Qty v="99" /> | ||
| </Interval> | ||
| <Interval> | ||
| <Pos v="11" /> | ||
| <Qty v="99" /> | ||
| </Interval> | ||
| <Interval> | ||
| <Pos v="12" /> | ||
| <Qty v="99" /> | ||
| </Interval> | ||
| <Interval> | ||
| <Pos v="13" /> | ||
| <Qty v="99" /> | ||
| </Interval> | ||
| <Interval> | ||
| <Pos v="14" /> | ||
| <Qty v="99" /> | ||
| </Interval> | ||
| <Interval> | ||
| <Pos v="15" /> | ||
| <Qty v="99" /> | ||
| </Interval> | ||
| <Interval> | ||
| <Pos v="16" /> | ||
| <Qty v="99" /> | ||
| </Interval> | ||
| <Interval> | ||
| <Pos v="17" /> | ||
| <Qty v="99" /> | ||
| </Interval> | ||
| <Interval> | ||
| <Pos v="18" /> | ||
| <Qty v="99" /> | ||
| </Interval> | ||
| <Interval> | ||
| <Pos v="19" /> | ||
| <Qty v="99" /> | ||
| </Interval> | ||
| <Interval> | ||
| <Pos v="20" /> | ||
| <Qty v="99" /> | ||
| </Interval> | ||
| <Interval> | ||
| <Pos v="21" /> | ||
| <Qty v="99" /> | ||
| </Interval> | ||
| <Interval> | ||
| <Pos v="22" /> | ||
| <Qty v="99" /> | ||
| </Interval> | ||
| <Interval> | ||
| <Pos v="23" /> | ||
| <Qty v="99" /> | ||
| </Interval> | ||
| <Interval> | ||
| <Pos v="24" /> | ||
| <Qty v="99" /> | ||
| </Interval> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Verify NTC values in test files
Based on the analysis of the test files:
-
The production NTC2 file (NTC2_20210901_2D1_AT-IT1.xml) shows realistic NTC values ranging from 227 to 253 MW, with values being consistent across multiple intervals.
-
The test file with 96 intervals (NTC2_20210624_2D5_AT-IT1-test-96.xml) shows:
- First 3 intervals: Real-looking values (399, 488, 1024)
- Middle intervals: Placeholder value of 99
- Last intervals: Zero values
The value 99 appears to be a deliberate test placeholder rather than a realistic NTC value, as it's significantly lower than both:
- The production values (227-253 MW)
- The initial test intervals (399-1024 MW)
🔗 Analysis chain
Verify the data pattern and schema compliance
Observations about the data pattern:
- First 3 intervals have varying NTC values (399, 488, 1024)
- All new intervals (4-24) have the same value (99)
Questions to verify:
- Is 99 a valid placeholder or should it contain real NTC values?
- Does the XML schema allow 24 intervals for this period?
Let's verify the schema constraints and typical NTC values:
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify XML schema constraints and analyze NTC patterns
# Check if schema exists and validate document structure
fd -e xsd capacity-document.xsd
# Look for similar NTC2 test files to compare value patterns
fd -e xml -x grep -l "NTC2.*AT-IT" {}
Length of output: 2082
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's analyze the NTC values in similar test files to understand the patterns
# Check NTC values in AT-IT1 test files
echo "=== AT-IT1 NTC values ==="
cat "./cse-cc-import-runner-app/src/test/resources/com/farao_community/farao/cse/import_runner/app/services/NTC2_20210901_2D1_AT-IT1.xml" | grep -A1 "<Qty"
# Check NTC values in test files with -96 suffix which might indicate complete 24-hour data
echo -e "\n=== Complete 24-hour test file NTC values ==="
cat "./cse-cc-import-runner-app/src/test/resources/com/farao_community/farao/cse/import_runner/app/services/NTC2_20210624_2D5_AT-IT1-test-96.xml" | grep -A1 "<Qty"
# Check if there are any comments or documentation about test data values
echo -e "\n=== Comments about test data ==="
rg -i "test.*ntc|ntc.*test" -A 2 -B 2
Length of output: 60976
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's analyze the real NTC values in production files and compare with test files
# Check NTC values in production file
echo "=== Production NTC2 file values ==="
cat "./cse-cc-import-runner-app/src/test/resources/com/farao_community/farao/cse/import_runner/app/services/NTC2_20210901_2D1_AT-IT1.xml" | grep -A1 "<Qty"
# Check if there are any test files with 96 intervals to understand the expected pattern
echo -e "\n=== Test file with 96 intervals ==="
cat "./cse-cc-import-runner-app/src/test/resources/com/farao_community/farao/cse/import_runner/app/services/NTC2_20210624_2D5_AT-IT1-test-96.xml" | grep -A1 "<Qty"
# Look for any documentation about test data values in source code
echo -e "\n=== Documentation about test data ==="
rg -i "test.*data|mock.*data" -A 2 -B 2
Length of output: 30439
| throw new CseDataException(String.format("CapacityTimeSeries contains %s intervals which is different to 24 or 96", qtyByPositionMap.size())); | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| return qtyByPositionMap.get(position); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Handle the possibility of a null value when retrieving from the map
The method qtyByPositionMap.get(position) may return null if the position key does not exist, potentially leading to a NullPointerException.
Consider adding a null check:
- return qtyByPositionMap.get(position);
+ Double quantity = qtyByPositionMap.get(position);
+ if (quantity == null) {
+ throw new CseDataException("No quantity found for position: " + position);
+ }
+ return quantity;📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| return qtyByPositionMap.get(position); | |
| Double quantity = qtyByPositionMap.get(position); | |
| if (quantity == null) { | |
| throw new CseDataException("No quantity found for position: " + position); | |
| } | |
| return quantity; |
| if (qtyByPositionMap.size() == 96) { | ||
| position = 1 + (4 * targetDateInCETZone.getHour()) + (targetDateInCETZone.getMinute() / 15); | ||
| } else if (qtyByPositionMap.size() == 24) { | ||
| position = targetDateInCETZone.getHour() + 1; | ||
| } else { | ||
| throw new CseDataException(String.format("CapacityTimeSeries contains %s intervals which is different to 24 or 96", qtyByPositionMap.size())); | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Add validation for minutes to ensure they are multiples of 15
When calculating the position for 96 intervals, the minutes should be multiples of 15 to align with 15-minute intervals. If targetDateInCETZone.getMinute() is not a multiple of 15, it could result in incorrect position calculations.
Consider adding a validation check:
+ if (qtyByPositionMap.size() == 96) {
+ if (targetDateInCETZone.getMinute() % 15 != 0) {
+ throw new CseDataException("Minutes must be a multiple of 15 for 96 intervals");
+ }
position = 1 + (4 * targetDateInCETZone.getHour()) + (targetDateInCETZone.getMinute() / 15);
} else if (qtyByPositionMap.size() == 24) {
position = targetDateInCETZone.getHour() + 1;Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
| <TimeInterval v="2021-06-23T23:00Z/2021-06-24T01:00Z" /> | ||
| <Resolution v="PT60M" /> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Update TimeInterval and Resolution to align with 96 intervals
The current <TimeInterval> spans 2 hours with a <Resolution> of 60 minutes, but 96 intervals are defined. For 96 intervals over 24 hours, the resolution should be 15 minutes, and the TimeInterval should cover a full day.
Modify the TimeInterval and Resolution as follows:
- <TimeInterval v="2021-06-23T23:00Z/2021-06-24T01:00Z" />
- <Resolution v="PT60M" />
+ <TimeInterval v="2021-06-23T23:00Z/2021-06-24T23:00Z" />
+ <Resolution v="PT15M" />📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| <TimeInterval v="2021-06-23T23:00Z/2021-06-24T01:00Z" /> | |
| <Resolution v="PT60M" /> | |
| <TimeInterval v="2021-06-23T23:00Z/2021-06-24T23:00Z" /> | |
| <Resolution v="PT15M" /> |
Please check if the PR fulfills these requirements (please use
'[x]'to check the checkboxes, or submit the PR and then click the checkboxes)Does this PR already have an issue describing the problem ? If so, link to this issue using
'#XXX'and skip the restWhat kind of change does this PR introduce? (Bug fix, feature, docs update, ...)
What is the current behavior? (You can also link to an open issue here)
What is the new behavior (if this is a feature change)?
Does this PR introduce a breaking change? (What changes might users need to make in their application due to this PR?)
Other information:
(if any of the questions/checkboxes don't apply, please delete them entirely)
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Tests