-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Upgrade dependencies #212
Upgrade dependencies #212
Conversation
Signed-off-by: thiriondan <daniel.thirion@rte-france.com>
WalkthroughThe changes primarily involve a comprehensive package restructuring and namespace migration across multiple modules of the CSE (Cross-Border Electricity) project. The modifications focus on updating import statements from older package structures to new, more organized namespaces, particularly within the Changes
Poem
Tip CodeRabbit's docstrings feature is now available as part of our Early Access Program! Simply use the command 📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI 📒 Files selected for processing (54)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (51)
🔇 Additional comments (6)cse-lib/network-processing/src/test/java/com/farao_community/farao/cse/network_processing/busbar_change/BusBarChangePostProcessorTest.java (1)
The import path changes from Let's verify the consistency of this package restructuring across the codebase: ✅ Verification successfulPackage restructuring is complete and consistent The verification shows:
🏁 Scripts executedThe following scripts were executed for the analysis: Script: #!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for any remaining references to the old package structure
# and ensure all related files have been updated consistently
# Check for any remaining references to the old package
echo "Checking for any remaining references to old package structure..."
rg "com\.powsybl\.openrao\.data\.cracio\.cse\.parameters"
# Check for consistency in new package usage
echo "Verifying consistent usage of new package structure..."
rg "com\.powsybl\.openrao\.data\.crac\.io\.cse\.parameters\.(BusBarChangeSwitches|SwitchPairId)"
Length of output: 3082 pom.xml (3)
The updates to FARAO dependencies (1.38.1) and dichotomy (4.24.0) are minor version bumps. However, we should verify their compatibility. ✅ Verification successfulLet me analyze the dependencies further to verify their compatibility. This will help us understand:
This information will help verify compatibility between these components. Based on the analysis of the dependencies, I can now provide a final response: FARAO dependencies update appears compatible The dependency structure shows consistent version management through properties:
The minor version bumps maintain backward compatibility, and the dependency hierarchy is properly structured with no conflicting version declarations. 🏁 Scripts executedThe following scripts were executed for the analysis: Script: #!/bin/bash
# Check for any explicit version conflicts in dependency tree
echo "Checking for version conflicts..."
find . -name "pom.xml" -exec grep -l "farao" {} \; | while read pom; do
echo "Analyzing $pom..."
grep -A 5 "<groupId>com.farao-community.farao</groupId>" "$pom"
done
Length of output: 7329 Script: #!/bin/bash
# Check the specific versions of FARAO dependencies in use
echo "Checking FARAO dependencies versions..."
rg -A 5 "farao-dependencies" --type xml
# Check dichotomy usage
echo -e "\nChecking dichotomy usage..."
rg -A 5 "farao-dichotomy" --type xml
# Check RAO runner usage
echo -e "\nChecking RAO runner usage..."
rg -A 5 "gridcapa-rao-runner" --type xml
Length of output: 3673
The JAXB plugin update from
The upgrade to JAXB 4.x represents a significant change as it's part of Jakarta EE. This requires:
✅ Verification successfulJAXB upgrade is compatible with current codebase The codebase already uses Jakarta XML Binding ( The JAXB 4.x upgrade in the POM is safe as:
🏁 Scripts executedThe following scripts were executed for the analysis: Script: #!/bin/bash
# Check for any remaining javax.xml.bind imports that need migration
echo "Searching for javax.xml.bind imports that need migration..."
rg "javax\.xml\.bind" --type java
# Check for potential XML binding issues in source files
echo "Checking for XML-related annotations..."
rg "@XmlRootElement|@XmlElement|@XmlAttribute" --type java
Length of output: 314 Script: #!/bin/bash
# Let's try a broader search for XML-related code and annotations
echo "Searching for XML-related imports and annotations..."
rg -i "xml|jaxb" --type java -l
# Check for any binding.xml or jaxb configuration files
echo "Checking for JAXB configuration files..."
fd -e xml -x grep -l -i "jaxb|binding" {} \;
# Look for maven-jaxb-plugin usage in pom files
echo "Checking for JAXB plugin usage in pom files..."
fd "pom.xml" -x grep -A 5 -B 5 "maven-jaxb" {} \;
Length of output: 4280 Script: #!/bin/bash
# Let's examine the actual XML-related code in a few key files to check for JAXB usage
echo "Checking TargetChDocument.java for JAXB annotations..."
rg -A 10 "@Xml|import.*xml" cse-lib/data/src/main/java/com/farao_community/farao/cse/data/target_ch/TargetChDocument.java
echo "Checking CseRequest.java for JAXB annotations..."
rg -A 10 "@Xml|import.*xml" cse-runner-api/src/main/java/com/farao_community/farao/cse/runner/api/resource/CseRequest.java
echo "Checking CseResponse.java for JAXB annotations..."
rg -A 10 "@Xml|import.*xml" cse-runner-api/src/main/java/com/farao_community/farao/cse/runner/api/resource/CseResponse.java
# Let's also check if there are any XML-related dependencies in the pom files
echo "Checking XML dependencies in pom files..."
fd "pom.xml" -x grep -A 3 -B 3 "xml.bind|jaxb" {} \;
Length of output: 1994 cse-lib/data/pom.xml (2)Line range hint The JAXB runtime dependency is correctly scoped as 'runtime' and version is aligned with the parent POM.
The migration to ✅ Verification successfulLet me gather more information about the XSD files and their bindings in the pom.xml. Based on the gathered information, I can now generate the final response as the plugin configuration has been thoroughly verified. JAXB plugin configuration is properly structured The plugin configuration is correctly set up with:
🏁 Scripts executedThe following scripts were executed for the analysis: Script: #!/bin/bash
# Check if all XSD files are covered by plugin executions
echo "Verifying XSD coverage..."
fd -e xsd . src/main/resources | while read xsd; do
echo "Checking coverage for $xsd..."
grep -r "$(basename "$xsd")" . --include="pom.xml"
done
# Verify generated source directories are properly configured
echo "Checking generated source directories..."
grep -r "generateDirectory" . --include="pom.xml"
Length of output: 1396 Script: #!/bin/bash
# Check XSD bindings in pom.xml
echo "Checking XSD bindings in pom.xml..."
grep -A 10 "<schemaDirectory>" ./cse-lib/data/pom.xml
# List all XSD files referenced in pom.xml
echo -e "\nXSD files referenced in pom.xml:"
grep -r "\.xsd" ./cse-lib/data/pom.xml
# Check if there are any other pom.xml files that might contain XSD configurations
echo -e "\nChecking other pom.xml files for XSD references:"
find . -name "pom.xml" -exec grep -l "\.xsd" {} \;
Length of output: 6437 Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
Please check if the PR fulfills these requirements (please use
'[x]'
to check the checkboxes, or submit the PR and then click the checkboxes)Does this PR already have an issue describing the problem ? If so, link to this issue using
'#XXX'
and skip the restWhat kind of change does this PR introduce? (Bug fix, feature, docs update, ...)
What is the current behavior? (You can also link to an open issue here)
What is the new behavior (if this is a feature change)?
Does this PR introduce a breaking change? (What changes might users need to make in their application due to this PR?)
Other information:
(if any of the questions/checkboxes don't apply, please delete them entirely)
Summary by CodeRabbit