-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 672
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
🐛 Ensure rich_markup_mode=None
disables Rich formatting
#859
Conversation
📝 Docs preview for commit 01fef55 at: https://bd907d4a.typertiangolo.pages.dev |
rounded = ["╭", "─", "┬", "╮", "│", "├", "┼", "┤", "╰", "┴", "╯"] | ||
|
||
|
||
def test_rich_markup_mode_none(): |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This test currently fails on master
, which is clearly a bug IMO.
I second the idea of keeping the default behaviour as a function of Rich's installation status. I think the easiest way towards the user defined global default is to close #647 and merge this bugfix. After which I would take a shot at reimplementing #647 on top of this fix. I would open a new PR for that and mention #647 there as a reference. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I cloned this branch, reviewed the test
tests/test_rich_markup_mode.py
and ran it locally on my machine. Both test cases pass.
The documentation change looks good to me, too.
This would really help in my project. I like having a canonization test for --help of my utilities. Currently such a test has to depend on whether rich is installed, and with rich installed the output is full of unicode characters. I'd prefer enforcing the plain help for this test. |
📝 Docs preview for commit 16ce4e5 at: https://c88e2772.typertiangolo.pages.dev |
📝 Docs preview for commit 98a8ec0 at: https://4535a010.typertiangolo.pages.dev Modified Pages |
Awesome, thank you @svlandeg! Thanks for all the clear explanations, clean code, and help with everything. 🙇 🚀 This will be available in Typer |
assert all(c not in result.stdout for c in rounded) | ||
|
||
|
||
def test_rich_markup_mode_rich(): |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This test fails with 0.12.5 release
def test_rich_markup_mode_rich():
app = typer.Typer(rich_markup_mode="rich")
@app.command()
def main(arg: str):
"""Main function"""
print(f"Hello {arg}")
assert app.rich_markup_mode == "rich"
result = runner.invoke(app, ["World"])
assert "Hello World" in result.stdout
result = runner.invoke(app, ["--help"])
> assert any(c in result.stdout for c in rounded)
E assert False
E + where False = any(<generator object test_rich_markup_mode_rich.<locals>.<genexpr> at 0x7f931ae59d80>)
tests/test_rich_markup_mode.py:40: AssertionError
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hi @kraj, thanks for the comment. That's odd - I can't reproduce the test failure locally and the CI goes green with this change as well.
Could you please open a new discussion thread to look into this more, and provide us there with more information about your system setup and the failure you're seeing? 🙏
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I build a minimal image which just have a kernel+busybox+typer and its dependencies. So perhaps thats the difference, some implicit dependency coming in indirectly on full distributions like ubuntu, fedora etc in CI
This PR is an alternative to #726.
First, it fixes the bug described in #853, namely that
does not actually disable Rich formatting on the current
master
, when Rich is installed. This is because many of the methods incore.py
only check whetherrich
is available before calling the functions inrich_utils.py
. Instead, the value ofrich_markup_mode
should be checked as well, as in in PR #726 and as in this PR.However, when we do that, we effectively make
None
the default value, even when Rich is installed. This aligns with the current documentation:However, one could argue that this behaviour is a bit unexpected, and that Rich formatting should be the default when Rich is installed. This is what the test suite currently assumes on
master
, and attempting to change the test suite (as in #726) shows that there would be many breaking cases for users as well.So, as an alternative to #726 I suggest to fix the original bug, while keeping the default behaviour as it was: Rich formatting if Rich is installed, no formatting if it isn't installed. By introducing a new var
DEFAULT_MARKUP_MODE
this behaviour is formalized. This will also pave the way to potentially expending this functionality and allowing the user to set this default globally, as proposed in #647. For now, I would focus first on getting this bug resolved and deciding what the defaults should look like.If we do decide to merge this PR, we can close #726 (or vice versa).