Bazel starlark rules for building protocol buffers +/- gRPC ✨.
bazel | gazelle | protobuf | grpc |
@build_stack_rules_proto
provides:
- Rules for driving the
protoc
tool within a bazel workspace. - A gazelle extension that
generates rules based on the content of your
.proto
files. - A repository rule that runs gazelle in an external workspace.
- Example setups for a variety of languages.
rules_proto (v3)
- Table of Contents
- Getting Started
- Writing Custom Plugins and Rules
- History
load("@bazel_tools//tools/build_defs/repo:http.bzl", "http_archive")
# Release: v3.1.0
# TargetCommitish: master
# Date: 2024-02-13 05:53:39 +0000 UTC
# URL: https://github.com/stackb/rules_proto/releases/tag/v3.1.0
# Size: 1995581 (2.0 MB)
http_archive(
name = "build_stack_rules_proto",
sha256 = "ee7a11d66e7bbc5b0f7a35ca3e960cb9a5f8a314b22252e19912dfbc6e22782d",
strip_prefix = "rules_proto-3.1.0",
urls = ["https://github.com/stackb/rules_proto/archive/v3.1.0.tar.gz"],
)
register_toolchains("@build_stack_rules_proto//toolchain:standard")
This prepares
protoc
for theproto_compile
rule. For simple setups, consider@build_stack_rules_proto//toolchain:prebuilt
to skip compilation of the tool.
NOTE: if you are planning on hand-writing your
BUILD.bazel
rules yourself (not using the gazelle build file generator), STOP HERE. You'll need to provide typical proto dependencies such as@rules_proto
and@com_google_protobuf
(use macros below if desired), but no additional core dependencies are needed at this point.
load("@build_stack_rules_proto//deps:core_deps.bzl", "core_deps")
core_deps()
This brings in
@io_bazel_rules_go
,@bazel_gazelle
, and@rules_proto
if you don't already have them.
The gazelle extension and associated golang dependencies are optional; you can write
proto_compile
and other derived rules by hand. For gazelle support, carry on.
load(
"@io_bazel_rules_go//go:deps.bzl",
"go_register_toolchains",
"go_rules_dependencies",
)
go_rules_dependencies()
go_register_toolchains(version = "1.18.2")
Standard biolerplate for
@io_bazel_rules_go
.
load( "@bazel_gazelle//:deps.bzl", "gazelle_dependencies")
gazelle_dependencies()
Standard boilerplate for
@bazel_gazelle
.
load("@build_stack_rules_proto//:go_deps.bzl", "gazelle_protobuf_extension_go_deps")
gazelle_protobuf_extension_go_deps()
This brings in
@com_github_emicklei_proto
. github.com/emicklei/proto is used by the gazelle extension to parse proto files.
load("@build_stack_rules_proto//deps:protobuf_core_deps.bzl", "protobuf_core_deps")
protobuf_core_deps()
This brings in
@com_google_protobuf
and friends if you don't already have them.
load("@bazel_gazelle//:def.bzl", "gazelle", "gazelle_binary")
gazelle_binary(
name = "gazelle-protobuf",
languages = [
"@bazel_gazelle//language/go",
"@bazel_gazelle//language/proto",
# must be after the proto extension (order matters)
"@build_stack_rules_proto//language/protobuf",
],
)
gazelle(
name = "gazelle",
gazelle = ":gazelle-protobuf",
)
The gazelle setup is typically placed in the root
BUILD.bazel
file.
The gazelle extension can be configured using "build directives" and/or a YAML file.
Gazelle is configured by special comments in BUILD files called directives.
Gazelle works by visiting each package in your workspace; configuration is done "on the way in" whereas actual rule generation is done "on the way out". Gazelle configuration of a subdirectory inherits that from its parents. As such, directives placed in the root
BUILD.bazel
file apply to the entire workspace.
# gazelle:proto_rule proto_compile implementation stackb:rules_proto:proto_compile
# gazelle:proto_plugin cpp implementation builtin:cpp
# gazelle:proto_plugin protoc-gen-grpc-cpp implementation grpc:grpc:cpp
# gazelle:proto_rule proto_cc_library implementation stackb:rules_proto:proto_cc_library
# gazelle:proto_rule proto_cc_library deps @com_google_protobuf//:protobuf
# gazelle:proto_rule proto_cc_library visibility //visibility:public
# gazelle:proto_rule grpc_cc_library implementation stackb:rules_proto:grpc_cc_library
# gazelle:proto_rule grpc_cc_library deps @com_github_grpc_grpc//:grpc++
# gazelle:proto_rule grpc_cc_library deps @com_github_grpc_grpc//:grpc++_reflection
# gazelle:proto_rule grpc_cc_library visibility //visibility:public
# gazelle:proto_language cpp plugin cpp
# gazelle:proto_language cpp plugin protoc-gen-grpc-cpp
# gazelle:proto_language cpp rule proto_compile
# gazelle:proto_language cpp rule proto_cc_library
# gazelle:proto_language cpp rule grpc_cc_library
Let's unpack this a bit:
gazelle:proto_plugin cpp implementation builtin:cpp
associates the namecpp
with a piece of golang code that implements theprotoc.Plugin
interface. The extension maintains a registry of these actors (the gazelle extension ships with a number of them out of the box, but you can also write your own). The core responsibility aprotoc.Plugin
implementation is to to predict the files that a protoc plugin tool will generate for an individualproto_library
rule. The implemention has full read access to theprotoc.File
s in theproto_library
to be able to predict if a file will be generated and where it will appear in the filesystem (specifically, relative to the bazel execution root during aproto_compile
action).gazelle:proto_rule proto_compile implementation stackb:rules_proto:proto_compile
associates the nameproto_compile
with a piece of golang code that implements theprotoc.LanguageRule
interface. The extension maintains a registry of rule implementations. Similarly, the extension ships with a bunch of them out of the box, but you can write your own custom rules as well. The core responsibility aprotoc.LanguageRule
implementation is construct a gazellerule.Rule
based upon aproto_library
rule and the set of plugins that are configured with it.gazelle:proto_language cpp plugin cpp
instantiates aprotoc.LanguageConfig
having the namecpp
and adds thecpp
plugin to it. The language configuration bundles bundles plugins and rules together.gazelle:proto_rule grpc_cc_library deps @com_github_grpc_grpc//:grpc++
configures the rule such that all generated rules will have that dependency.
+/- intent modifiers. Although not pictured in this example, many of the directives take an intent modifier to turn configuration on/off. For example, if you wanted to suppress the grpc c++ plugin in the package
//proto/javaapi
, put a directive likegazelle:proto_language cpp rule -grpc_cc_library
inproto/javaapi/BUILD.bazel
(note the-
symbol preceding the name). To suppress the language entirely, usegazelle:proto_language cpp enabled false
.
You can also configure the extension using a YAML file. This is semantically
similar to adding gazelle directives to the root BUILD
file; the YAML
configuration applies to all downstream packages. The equivalent YAML config for
the above directives looks like:
plugins:
- name: cpp
implementation: builtin:cpp
- name: protoc-gen-grpc-cpp
implementation: grpc:grpc:cpp
rules:
- name: proto_compile
implementation: stackb:rules_proto:proto_compile
visibility:
- //visibility:public
- name: proto_cc_library
implementation: stackb:rules_proto:proto_cc_library
visibility:
- //visibility:public
deps:
- "@com_google_protobuf//:protobuf"
- name: grpc_cc_library
implementation: stackb:rules_proto:grpc_cc_library
visibility:
- //visibility:public
deps:
- "@com_github_grpc_grpc//:grpc++"
- "@com_github_grpc_grpc//:grpc++_reflection"
languages:
- name: "cpp"
plugins:
- cpp
- protoc-gen-grpc-cpp
rules:
- proto_compile
- proto_cc_library
- grpc_cc_library
A yaml config is particularly useful in conjunction with the
proto_repository
rule, for example to apply a set of custom plugins over the googleapis/googleapis repo.
To use this in a gazelle rule, specify -proto_configs
in args
(comma-separated list):
gazelle(
name = "gazelle",
gazelle = ":gazelle-protobuf",
args = [
"-proto_configs=example/config.yaml",
],
)
Now that we have the WORKSPACE
setup and gazelle configured, we can run
gazelle:
$ bazel run //:gazelle -- proto/
To restrict gazelle to only a particular subdirectory example/routeguide/
:
$ bazel run //:gazelle -- example/routeguide/
Gazelle should now have generated something like the following:
load("@rules_proto//proto:defs.bzl", "proto_library")
load("@build_stack_rules_proto//rules/cc:grpc_cc_library.bzl", "grpc_cc_library")
load("@build_stack_rules_proto//rules/cc:proto_cc_library.bzl", "proto_cc_library")
load("@build_stack_rules_proto//rules:proto_compile.bzl", "proto_compile")
proto_library(
name = "routeguide_proto",
srcs = ["routeguide.proto"],
visibility = ["//visibility:public"],
)
proto_compile(
name = "routeguide_cpp_compile",
outputs = [
"routeguide.grpc.pb.cc",
"routeguide.grpc.pb.h",
"routeguide.pb.cc",
"routeguide.pb.h",
],
plugins = [
"@build_stack_rules_proto//plugin/builtin:cpp",
"@build_stack_rules_proto//plugin/grpc/grpc:protoc-gen-grpc-cpp",
],
proto = "routeguide_proto",
)
proto_cc_library(
name = "routeguide_cc_library",
srcs = ["routeguide.pb.cc"],
hdrs = ["routeguide.pb.h"],
visibility = ["//visibility:public"],
deps = ["@com_google_protobuf//:protobuf"],
)
grpc_cc_library(
name = "routeguide_grpc_cc_library",
srcs = ["routeguide.grpc.pb.cc"],
hdrs = ["routeguide.grpc.pb.h"],
visibility = ["//visibility:public"],
deps = [
":routeguide_cc_library",
"@com_github_grpc_grpc//:grpc++",
"@com_github_grpc_grpc//:grpc++_reflection",
],
)
Regarding rules like
@build_stack_rules_proto//rules/cc:proto_cc_library.bzl%proto_cc_library"
.
These are nearly always very thin wrappers for the "real" rule. For example,
here's the implementation in proto_cc_library.bzl
:
load("@rules_cc//cc:defs.bzl", "cc_library")
def proto_cc_library(**kwargs):
cc_library(**kwargs)
An implementation detail of gazelle itself is that two different language
extensions should not claim the same load namespace, so in order to prevent
potential conflicts with other possible gazelle extensions, using the name
@rules_cc//cc:defs.bzl%cc_library
is undesirable.
The core of stackb/rules_proto
contains two build rules:
Rule | Description |
---|---|
proto_compile |
Executes the protoc tool. |
proto_plugin |
Provides static protoc plugin-specific configuration. |
Example:
load("@rules_proto//proto:defs.bzl", "proto_library")
load("@build_stack_rules_proto//rules:proto_compile.bzl", "proto_compile")
proto_library(
name = "thing_proto",
srcs = ["thing.proto"],
deps = ["@com_google_protobuf//:timestamp_proto"],
)
proto_plugin(name = "cpp")
proto_compile(
name = "person_cpp_compile",
outputs = [
"person.pb.cc",
"person.pb.h",
],
plugins = [":cpp"],
proto = "person_proto",
)
Takeaways:
- A
proto_library
rule forms the basis for other language-specific derived rules. proto_library
is provided by bazelbuild/rules_proto.- A
proto_compile
rule references a singleproto_library
target. - The
plugins
attribute is a list of labels toproto_plugin
targets. - The
outputs
attribute names the files that will be generated by the protoc invocation. - The
proto
extension provided by [bazel-gazelle] is responsible for generating
proto_library
.
proto_plugin
primarily provides the plugin tool executable. The example seen
above is the simplest case where the plugin is builtin to protoc
itself; no
separate plugin tool is required. In this case the proto_plugin
rule
degenerates into just a name
.
It is possible to add additional plugin-specific
name = "foo", options = ["bar"]
on the proto_plugin
rule, but the use-case
for this is narrow. Generally it is preferred to say
# gazelle:proto_plugin foo option bar
such that the option can be interpreted
during a gazelle run.
proto_compiled_sources
is used when you prefer to check the generated files
into source control. This may be necessary for legacy reasons, during an initial
Bazel migration, or to support better IDE integration.
The shape of a proto_compiled_sources
rule is essentially identical to
proto_compile
with one exception: generated source are named in the srcs
attribute rather than outputs
.
For example, a proto_compiled_sources
named //example/thing:proto_go_sources
is a macro that generates three rules:
bazel build //example/thing:proto_go_sources
emits the generated files.bazel run //example/thing:proto_go_sources.update
copies the generated files back into the source package.bazel test //example/thing:proto_go_sources_test
asserts the source files are identical to generated files.
In this scenario, 2.
is used to build the generated files (in the bazel-bin/
output tree) and copy the example/thing/thing.pb.go
back into place where it
will be committed under source control. 3.
is used to prevent drift: if a
developer modifies thing.proto
and neglects to run the .update
the test will
fail in CI.
The macro proto_compile_assets
aggregates a list of dependencies (which
provide ProtoCompileInfo
) into a single runnable target that copies files in
bulk.
For example, bazel run //proto:assets
will copy all the generated .pb.go
files back into the source tree:
load("@build_stack_rules_proto//rules:proto_compile_assets.bzl", "proto_compile_assets")
proto_compile_assets(
name = "assets",
deps = [,
"//proto/api/v1:proto_go_compile",
"//proto/api/v2:proto_go_compile",
"//proto/api/v3:proto_go_compile",
],
)
Consider the following rule within the package example/thing
:
proto_compile(
name = "thing_go_compile",
output_mappings = ["thing.pb.go=github.com/stackb/rules_proto/example/thing/thing.pb.go"],
outputs = ["thing.pb.go"],
plugins = ["@build_stack_rules_proto//plugin/golang/protobuf:protoc-gen-go"],
proto = "thing_proto",
)
This rule is declaring that a file bazel-bin/example/thing/thing.pb.go
will be
output when the action is run. When we
bazel build //example/thing:thing_go_compile
, the file is indeed created.
Let's temporarily comment out the output_mappings
attribute and rebuild:
proto_compile(
name = "thing_go_compile",
# output_mappings = ["thing.pb.go=github.com/stackb/rules_proto/example/thing/thing.pb.go"],
outputs = ["thing.pb.go"],
plugins = ["@build_stack_rules_proto//plugin/golang/protobuf:protoc-gen-go"],
proto = "thing_proto",
)
$ bazel build //example/thing:thing_go_compile
ERROR: /github.com/stackb/rules_proto/example/thing/BUILD.bazel:54:14: output 'example/thing/thing.pb.go' was not created
What happened? Let's add a debugging attribute verbose = True
on the rule:
this will print debugging information and show the bazel sandbox before and
after the protoc
tool is invoked:
proto_compile(
name = "thing_go_compile",
# output_mappings = ["thing.pb.go=github.com/stackb/rules_proto/example/thing/thing.pb.go"],
outputs = ["thing.pb.go"],
plugins = ["@build_stack_rules_proto//plugin/golang/protobuf:protoc-gen-go"],
proto = "thing_proto",
verbose = True,
)
$ bazel build //example/thing:thing_go_compile
##### SANDBOX BEFORE RUNNING PROTOC
./bazel-out/host/bin/external/com_google_protobuf/protoc
./bazel-out/darwin-opt-exec-2B5CBBC6/bin/external/com_github_golang_protobuf/protoc-gen-go/protoc-gen-go_/protoc-gen-go
./bazel-out/darwin-fastbuild/bin/example/thing/thing_proto-descriptor-set.proto.bin
./bazel-out/darwin-fastbuild/bin/external/com_google_protobuf/timestamp_proto-descriptor-set.proto.bin
##### SANDBOX AFTER RUNNING PROTOC
./bazel-out/darwin-fastbuild/bin/github.com/stackb/rules_proto/example/thing/thing.pb.go
So, the file was created, but not in the location we wanted. In this case the
protoc-gen-go
plugin is not "playing nice" with Bazel. Because this
thing.proto
has
option go_package = "github.com/stackb/rules_proto/example/thing;thing";
, the
output location is no longer based on the package
. This is a problem, because
Bazel semantics disallow declaring a File outside its package boundary. As a
result, we need to do a
mv ./bazel-out/darwin-fastbuild/bin/github.com/stackb/rules_proto/example/thing/thing.pb.go ./bazel-out/darwin-fastbuild/bin/example/thing/thing.pb.go
to relocate the file into its expected location before the action terminates.
Therefore, the output_mappings
attribute is a list of entries that map file
locations want=got
relative to the action execution root. It is required when
the actual output location does not match the desired location. This can occur
if the proto package
statement does not match the Bazel package path, or in
special circumstances specific to the plugin itself (like go_package
).
From an implementation standpoint, this is very similar to the go_repository
rule. Both can download external files and then run the gazelle generator over
the downloaded files. Example:
proto_repository(
name = "googleapis",
build_directives = [
"gazelle:resolve proto google/api/http.proto //google/api:http_proto",
],
build_file_generation = "clean",
build_file_proto_mode = "file",
reresolve_known_proto_imports = True,
proto_language_config_file = "@//:rules_proto_config.yaml",
strip_prefix = "googleapis-02710fa0ea5312d79d7fb986c9c9823fb41049a9",
type = "zip",
urls = ["https://codeload.github.com/googleapis/googleapis/zip/02710fa0ea5312d79d7fb986c9c9823fb41049a9"],
)
Takeaways:
- The
urls
,strip_prefix
andtype
behave similarly tohttp_archive
. build_file_proto_mode
is the same thego_repository
attribute of the same name; additionally the valuefile
is permitted which generates aproto_library
for each individual proto file.build_file_generation
is the same thego_repository
attribute of the same name; additionally the valueclean
is supported. For example, googleapis already has a set of BUILD files; theclean
mode will remove all the existing build files before generating new ones.build_directives
is the same asgo_repository
. Resolve directives in this case are needed because the gazellelanguage/proto
extension hardcodes a proto import likegoogle/api/http.proto
to resolve to the@go_googleapis
workspace; here we want to make sure that http.proto resolves to the same external workspace.proto_language_config_file
is an optional label pointing to a validconfig.yaml
file to configure this extension.reresolve_known_proto_imports
is a boolean attribute that has special meaning for the googleapis repository. Due to the fact that the builtin gazelle "proto" extension has hardcoded logic for what googleapis deps look like, additional work is needed to override that. With this sample configuration, the following build command succeeds:
$ bazel build @googleapis//google/api:annotations_cc_library
Target @googleapis//google/api:annotations_cc_library up-to-date:
bazel-bin/external/googleapis/google/api/libannotations_cc_library.a
bazel-bin/external/googleapis/google/api/libannotations_cc_library.so
Another example using the Bazel repository:
load("@build_stack_rules_proto//rules/proto:proto_repository.bzl", "proto_repository")
proto_repository(
name = "bazelapis",
build_directives = [
"gazelle:exclude third_party",
"gazelle:proto_language go enable true",
"gazelle:proto_language closure enabled true",
"gazelle:prefix github.com/bazelbuild/bazelapis",
],
build_file_expunge = True,
build_file_proto_mode = "file",
cfgs = ["//proto:config.yaml"],
imports = [
"@googleapis//:imports.csv",
"@protoapis//:imports.csv",
"@remoteapis//:imports.csv",
],
strip_prefix = "bazel-02ad3e3bc6970db11fe80f966da5707a6c389fdd",
type = "zip",
urls = ["https://codeload.github.com/bazelbuild/bazel/zip/02ad3e3bc6970db11fe80f966da5707a6c389fdd"],
)
Takeaways:
- The
build_directives
are setting thegazelle:prefix
for thelanguage/go
plugin; twoproto_language
configs named in theproto/config.yaml
are being enabled. build_file_expunge
means remove all existing BUILD files before generating new ones.build_file_proto_mode = "file"
means make a separateproto_library
rule for every.proto
file.cfgs = ["//proto:config.yaml"]
means use the configuration in this YAML file as a base set of gazelle directives. It is easier/more consistent to share the sameconfig.yaml
file across multipleproto_repository
rules.
The last one imports = ["@googleapis//:imports.csv", ...]
requires extra
explanation. When the proto_repository
gazelle process finishes, it writes a
file named imports.csv
in the root of the external workspace. This file
records the association between import statements and bazel labels, much like a
gazelle:resolve
directive:
# GENERATED FILE, DO NOT EDIT (created by gazelle)
# lang,imp.lang,imp,label
go,go,github.com/googleapis/gapic-showcase/server/genproto,@googleapis//google/example/showcase/v1:compliance_go_proto
go,go,google.golang.org/genproto/firestore/bundle,@googleapis//google/firestore/bundle:bundle_go_proto
go,go,google.golang.org/genproto/googleapis/actions/sdk/v2,@googleapis//google/actions/sdk/v2:account_linking_go_proto
Therefore, the imports
attribute assists gazelle in figuring how to resolve
imports. Therefore, when gazelle is preparing a go_library
rule and finds a
main.go
file having an import on
google.golang.org/genproto/firestore/bundle
, it knows to put
@googleapis//google/firestore/bundle:bundle_go_proto
in the rule deps
.
To take advantage of this mechanism in the default workspace, use the
proto_gazelle
rule.
proto_gazelle
is not a repository rule: it's just like the typical gazelle
rule, but with extra deps resolution superpowers. But, we discuss it here since
it works in conjunction with proto_repository
:
load("@build_stack_rules_proto//rules:proto_gazelle.bzl", "DEFAULT_LANGUAGES", "proto_gazelle")
proto_gazelle(
name = "gazelle",
cfgs = ["//proto:config.yaml"],
command = "update",
gazelle = ":gazelle-protobuf",
imports = [
"@bazelapis//:imports.csv",
"@googleapis//:imports.csv",
"@protoapis//:imports.csv",
"@remoteapis//:imports.csv",
],
)
In this example, we are again setting the base gazelle config using the YAML
file (the same one used in for the proto_repository
rules). We are also now
importing resolve information from four external sources.
With this setup, we can simply place an import statement like
import "src/main/java/com/google/devtools/build/lib/buildeventstream/proto/build_event_stream.proto";
in a foo.proto
file in the default workspace, and gazelle will automagically
figure out the import dependency tree spanning @bazelapis
, @remoteapis
,
@googleapis
, and the well-known types from @protoapis
.
This works for any proto_language
, with any set of custom protoc plugins.
golden_filegroup
is a utility macro for golden file testing. It works like a
native filegroup, but adds .update
and .test
targets. Example:
load("@build_stack_rules_proto//rules:golden_filegroup.bzl", "golden_filegroup")
# golden_filegroup asserts that generated files named in 'srcs' are
# identical to the ones checked into source control.
#
# Usage:
#
# $ bazel build :golden # not particularly useful, just a regular filegroup
#
# $ bazel test :golden.test # checks that generated files are identical to
# ones in git (for CI)
#
# $ bazel run :golden.update # copies the generated files into source tree
# (then 'git add' to your PR if it looks good)
golden_filegroup(
name = "golden",
srcs = [
":some_generated_file1.json",
":some_generated_file2.json",
],
)
The plugin name is an opaque string, but by convention they are maven-esqe artifact identifiers that follow a GitHub org/repo/plugin_name convention.
The rule name is an opaque string, but by convention they are maven-esqe artifact identifiers that follow a GitHub org/repo/rule_name convention.
Please consult the example/
directory and unit tests for more additional
detail.
Custom plugin implementations and rule implementations can be written in golang
or starlark. Golang implementations are statically compiled into the final
gazelle_binary
whereas starlark plugins are evaluated at gazelle runtime.
+
Full power of a statically compiled language, the golang stdlib, and external dependencies.+
Easier to test.+
API not experimental.-
Cannot be used in aproto_repository
rule without forking stackb/rules_proto.-
Initial setup harder, often housed within your own custom gazelle extension.
Until a dedicated tutorial is available, please consult the source code for examples.
+
More familiar to developer with starlark experience but not golang.+
Easier setup (*.star files in your gazelle repository)+
Possible to use in conjunction with theproto_repository
rule.-
Limited API: can only reference state that has been already configured via gazelle directives.-
Not possible to implement stateful design.-
No standard library.
Until a dedicated tutorial is available, please consult the reference example in
example/testdata/starlark_java
.
The original rules_proto was https://github.com/pubref/rules_proto. This was
redesigned around the proto_library
rule and moved to
https://github.com/stackb/rules_proto.
Following earlier experiments with aspects, this ruleset was forked to https://github.com/rules-proto-grpc/rules_proto_grpc. Aspect-based compilation was featured for quite a while there but has recently been deprecated.
Maintaining stackb/rules_proto
and its polyglot set of languages in its
original v0-v1 form became a full-time (unpaid) job. The main issue is that the
{LANG}_{PROTO|GRPC}_library
rules are tightly bound to a specific set of
dependencies. As such, rules_proto users are tightly bound to the specific
labels named by those rules. This is a problem for the maintainer as one must
keep the dependencies current. It is also a problem for rule consumers: it
becomes increasingly difficult to upgrade as the dependencies as assumptions and
dependencies drift.
With stackb/rules_proto
in its v2
gazelle-based form, it is largely
dependency-free: other than gazelle and the protoc
toolchain, there are
no dependencies that you cannot fully control in your own workspace via the
gazelle configuration.
The gazelle based design also makes things much simpler and powerful, because
the content of the proto files is the source of truth. Due to the fact that
Bazel does not permit reading/interpreting a file during the scope of an action,
it is impossible to make a decision about what to do. A prime example of this is
the go_package
option. If the go_package
option is present, the location of
the output file for protoc-gen-go
is completely different. As a result, the
information about the go_package metadata ultimately needs to be duplicated so
that the build system can know about it.
The gazelle-based approach moves all that messy interpretation and evaluation into a precompiled state; as a result, the work that needs to be done in the action itself is dramatically simplified.
Furthermore, by parsing the proto files it is easy to support complex custom plugins that do things like:
- Emit no files (only assert/lint).
- Emit a file only if a specific enum constant is found. With the previous
design, this was near impossible. With the
v2
design, theprotoc.Plugin
implementation can trivially perform that evaluation because it is handed the complete proto AST during gazelle evaluation.