Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Refactor tests which utilizes feature sets #1186

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Nov 23, 2020

Conversation

terryyylim
Copy link
Member

What this PR does / why we need it:
Couple of tests that are still in common, core, serving and storage modules still utilize feature sets and they should be removed. This is the first cleanup PR to refactor these tests, followed by the next which would remove feature sets entirely.

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

Fixes #

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?:

NONE

Signed-off-by: Terence <terencelimxp@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Terence <terencelimxp@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Terence <terencelimxp@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Terence <terencelimxp@gmail.com>
@terryyylim terryyylim changed the title WIP: Refactor tests which utilizes feature sets Refactor tests which utilizes feature sets Nov 23, 2020
@feast-ci-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: pyalex, terryyylim

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@pyalex
Copy link
Collaborator

pyalex commented Nov 23, 2020

/lgtm

@feast-ci-bot feast-ci-bot merged commit 280d87f into feast-dev:master Nov 23, 2020
@terryyylim terryyylim mentioned this pull request Nov 24, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants