Broaden google-cloud-core dependency

[ptoman-pa]

What this PR does / why we need it:
Broadens dependency on google-cloud-core. The limitation to 1.4.* seems tighter than it needs to be. The version 1.7.2 (which is the latest before 2.0.0) passes unit tests and makes feast more interoperable as a library with other systems.

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
Relates to #928

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?:

NONE

[feast-ci-bot]

Hi @ptoman-pa. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a feast-dev member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

Merging #2094 (2aa2256) into master (455176f) will decrease coverage by 9.50%.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #2094      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   83.45%   73.95%   -9.51%     
==========================================
  Files         100       98       -2     
  Lines        8088     8020      -68     
==========================================
- Hits         6750     5931     -819     
- Misses       1338     2089     +751     

Flag	Coverage Δ
integrationtests	73.95% <ø> (+0.05%)	⬆️
unittests	?

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
sdk/python/tests/unit/test_usage.py	13.86% <0.00%> (-86.14%)	⬇️
...ion/test_cli_apply_duplicated_featureview_names.py	14.54% <0.00%> (-85.46%)	⬇️
...n/tests/integration/registration/test_cli_chdir.py	18.51% <0.00%> (-81.49%)	⬇️
.../python/tests/integration/scaffolding/test_init.py	18.91% <0.00%> (-81.09%)	⬇️
sdk/python/tests/unit/test_proto_json.py	21.05% <0.00%> (-78.95%)	⬇️
sdk/python/feast/proto_json.py	18.18% <0.00%> (-77.28%)	⬇️
sdk/python/tests/doctest/test_all.py	16.36% <0.00%> (-76.37%)	⬇️
...ts/integration/scaffolding/test_repo_operations.py	24.07% <0.00%> (-75.93%)	⬇️
...n/tests/integration/online_store/test_e2e_local.py	24.48% <0.00%> (-75.52%)	⬇️
.../tests/integration/scaffolding/test_repo_config.py	37.20% <0.00%> (-62.80%)	⬇️
... and 25 more

---

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 455176f...2aa2256. Read the comment docs.

[felixwang9817]

hey @ptoman-pa, thanks for your PR! we require PRs to be signed; would you mind signing your commit and rebasing? thanks!

[ptoman-pa]

@felixwang9817 Thank you for the polite reminder! Signed.

[felixwang9817]

hey @ptoman-pa, I don't think the signing worked properly. if you look at your commit, you'll see it doesn't have the "signed off by" note that other commits have - could you try signing again with git commit -s? thanks!

[ptoman-pa]

Done. Also added a note about the project wanting signoffs rather than GPG, but we can remove that or break it into a separate PR depending on your preferences for repo management.

[felixwang9817]

/lgtm

[felixwang9817]

thanks for adding that note to our docs @ptoman-pa! it looks like the first of two commits is signed off properly, but the second isn't - would you mind fixing that? apologies for all the back and forth!

[felixwang9817]

/lgtm

[feast-ci-bot]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: felixwang9817, ptoman-pa

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• OWNERS [felixwang9817]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment