Updating lambda docker image to feature-server-python-aws #2130
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Signed-off-by: Danny Chiao <danny@tecton.ai>
|
/lgtm |
woop
approved these changes
Dec 9, 2021
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: adchia, woop The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
adchia
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 11, 2021
Signed-off-by: Danny Chiao <danny@tecton.ai>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What this PR does / why we need it:
This updates the lambda image to be feastdev/feature-server-python-aws instead of feastdev/feature-server-aws for more consistent naming with feature-server-java
Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
Fixes #
Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?: