Fix empty job tag #895
Merged
Fix empty job tag #895
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Signed-off-by: Jun Ki Min <42475935+loomlike@users.noreply.github.com>
loomlike
added
the
safe to test
Yuqing-cat
approved these changes
Dec 2, 2022
blrchen
approved these changes
Dec 2, 2022
blrchen
approved these changes
Dec 2, 2022
jaymo001
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 7, 2022
Signed-off-by: Jun Ki Min <42475935+loomlike@users.noreply.github.com> Signed-off-by: Jun Ki Min <42475935+loomlike@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Signed-off-by: Jun Ki Min 42475935+loomlike@users.noreply.github.com
Description
This is to fix nightly test failure. Seems the cause was when using online-sink and thus the output_path is None and
Databricks complains about None value tags.
How was this PR tested?
Tested with Databricks nightly test notebook.
Does this PR introduce any user-facing changes?