-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
pet id fix #41
pet id fix #41
Conversation
WalkthroughThe update modifies how item data is handled in auctions by adjusting the logic to account for the presence of Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant User
participant System
User->>System: Fetch Auction Data
System-->>System: Check for battlePetSpeciesID
alt Pet ID exists
System-->>System: Set petID
else Item ID
System-->>System: Set itemID
end
System->>User: Return Processed Auction Data
Assessment against linked issues
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (1)
- main.lua (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (1)
main.lua (1)
187-191
: Logic for handling petID and itemID appears correct.The changes correctly implement the logic to set
petID
ifbattlePetSpeciesID
is present, anditemID
otherwise. This aligns with the PR objectives to fix the issue of incorrect ID assignment in the output JSON.However, ensure that this change does not affect other parts of the codebase where
item_data
is used.Verification successful
Logic for handling petID and itemID appears correct.
The changes correctly implement the logic to set
petID
ifbattlePetSpeciesID
is present, anditemID
otherwise. This aligns with the PR objectives to fix the issue of incorrect ID assignment in the output JSON. The usage ofitem_data
andstorage.user_auctions
is localized to the same function, ensuring no adverse effects on the rest of the codebase.
- No further action is required.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify if changes to item_data affect other parts of the codebase. # Test: Search for `item_data` usage in the codebase. Expect: No adverse effects due to the new `petID` field. rg --type lua $'item_data'Length of output: 413
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify if changes to item_data's petID field affect other parts of the codebase. # Test: Search for usage of storage.user_auctions in the codebase to ensure no adverse effects. rg --type lua $'storage.user_auctions'Length of output: 147
closes #40
Summary by CodeRabbit
battlePetSpeciesID
, ensuring accurate item identification and listing data.