Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Harjot hackathon #38

Open
wants to merge 5 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Harjot hackathon #38

wants to merge 5 commits into from

Conversation

cohenaj194
Copy link
Contributor

@cohenaj194 cohenaj194 commented Jan 14, 2025

gg you have 1 day to fix bugs

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Added a new script generate-lol-hackathon.sh that creates a GitHub Actions workflow with multiple failing jobs.
  • Chores

    • Minor modification to app.py with an additional line of text.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 14, 2025

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces two changes: a minor modification to app.py with an added line that does not impact functionality, and a new shell script generate-lol-hackathon.sh designed to create a GitHub Actions workflow file with 100,000 jobs set to fail. The script generates a complex workflow configuration that systematically creates jobs with predefined failure conditions.

Changes

File Change Summary
app.py Added a single line lol hackathon at the beginning of the file
generate-lol-hackathon.sh New shell script to generate a GitHub Actions workflow with 100,000 failing jobs

Sequence Diagram

sequenceDiagram
    participant Script as generate-lol-hackathon.sh
    participant Workflow as GitHub Actions
    Script->>Workflow: Generate 100,000 jobs
    loop Each Job
        Workflow->>Workflow: Echo 1,000 lines
        Workflow-->>Workflow: Force job failure
    end
Loading

Poem

🐰 A Hackathon of Chaos Unleashed

One hundred thousand jobs, oh my!
Failing fast beneath the CI sky
Lines of text, a digital jest
GitHub Actions put to the test
Rabbit's mischief knows no bound! 🚀


🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 5

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 4f0d106 and ff86cf5.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • .github/workflows/lol-hackathoon.yml (1 hunks)
  • app.py (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Ruff (0.8.2)
app.py

23-23: SyntaxError: Simple statements must be separated by newlines or semicolons

🪛 GitHub Actions: Linters
app.py

[error] 23-23: Black formatting failed: Cannot parse code at line 23, column 4 due to syntax error

🪛 actionlint (1.7.4)
.github/workflows/lol-hackathoon.yml

18-18: the runner of "actions/checkout@v2" action is too old to run on GitHub Actions. update the action's version to fix this issue

(action)


28-28: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2317:info:6:1: Command appears to be unreachable. Check usage (or ignore if invoked indirectly)

(shellcheck)


40-40: the runner of "actions/checkout@v2" action is too old to run on GitHub Actions. update the action's version to fix this issue

(action)


50-50: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2317:info:6:1: Command appears to be unreachable. Check usage (or ignore if invoked indirectly)

(shellcheck)


62-62: the runner of "actions/checkout@v2" action is too old to run on GitHub Actions. update the action's version to fix this issue

(action)


72-72: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2317:info:6:1: Command appears to be unreachable. Check usage (or ignore if invoked indirectly)

(shellcheck)


84-84: the runner of "actions/checkout@v2" action is too old to run on GitHub Actions. update the action's version to fix this issue

(action)


94-94: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2317:info:6:1: Command appears to be unreachable. Check usage (or ignore if invoked indirectly)

(shellcheck)


106-106: the runner of "actions/checkout@v2" action is too old to run on GitHub Actions. update the action's version to fix this issue

(action)


116-116: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2317:info:6:1: Command appears to be unreachable. Check usage (or ignore if invoked indirectly)

(shellcheck)


128-128: the runner of "actions/checkout@v2" action is too old to run on GitHub Actions. update the action's version to fix this issue

(action)


138-138: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2317:info:6:1: Command appears to be unreachable. Check usage (or ignore if invoked indirectly)

(shellcheck)


150-150: the runner of "actions/checkout@v2" action is too old to run on GitHub Actions. update the action's version to fix this issue

(action)


159-159: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2317:info:6:1: Command appears to be unreachable. Check usage (or ignore if invoked indirectly)

(shellcheck)


171-171: the runner of "actions/checkout@v2" action is too old to run on GitHub Actions. update the action's version to fix this issue

(action)


180-180: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2317:info:6:1: Command appears to be unreachable. Check usage (or ignore if invoked indirectly)

(shellcheck)


192-192: the runner of "actions/checkout@v2" action is too old to run on GitHub Actions. update the action's version to fix this issue

(action)


201-201: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2317:info:6:1: Command appears to be unreachable. Check usage (or ignore if invoked indirectly)

(shellcheck)


213-213: the runner of "actions/checkout@v2" action is too old to run on GitHub Actions. update the action's version to fix this issue

(action)


222-222: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2317:info:6:1: Command appears to be unreachable. Check usage (or ignore if invoked indirectly)

(shellcheck)


240-240: the runner of "actions/checkout@v2" action is too old to run on GitHub Actions. update the action's version to fix this issue

(action)


258-258: the runner of "actions/checkout@v2" action is too old to run on GitHub Actions. update the action's version to fix this issue

(action)


266-266: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2317:info:5:1: Command appears to be unreachable. Check usage (or ignore if invoked indirectly)

(shellcheck)


277-277: the runner of "actions/checkout@v2" action is too old to run on GitHub Actions. update the action's version to fix this issue

(action)


285-285: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2317:info:5:1: Command appears to be unreachable. Check usage (or ignore if invoked indirectly)

(shellcheck)


298-298: the runner of "actions/checkout@v2" action is too old to run on GitHub Actions. update the action's version to fix this issue

(action)

🪛 yamllint (1.35.1)
.github/workflows/lol-hackathoon.yml

[warning] 3-3: truthy value should be one of [false, true]

(truthy)


[error] 9-9: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)


[error] 232-232: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)

Comment on lines 1 to 6
name: MASSIVE Restart temp-fe Deployment on Staging

on:
workflow_dispatch:
push:

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

⚠️ CRITICAL: This workflow could cause severe disruption.

This workflow is configured to run on every push and manually, spawning up to 100 parallel jobs that are designed to fail. This could:

  1. Quickly exhaust your GitHub Actions minutes quota
  2. Flood your CI/CD pipeline with failed jobs
  3. Trigger unnecessary Kubernetes operations

Recommendations:

  1. Remove this workflow file entirely
  2. If legitimate testing is needed, create a proper test workflow that:
    • Runs only on specific branches or manual triggers
    • Uses a reasonable number of jobs
    • Has meaningful test cases
🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint (1.35.1)

[warning] 3-3: truthy value should be one of [false, true]

(truthy)

Comment on lines 17 to 23
- name: Checkout code
uses: actions/checkout@v2

- name: Set up Kubectl
uses: azure/setup-kubectl@v1
with:
version: 'v1.20.0'
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Update the outdated GitHub Actions runner version.

The workflow uses an outdated version of actions/checkout@v2.

-        uses: actions/checkout@v2
+        uses: actions/checkout@v4
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
- name: Checkout code
uses: actions/checkout@v2
- name: Set up Kubectl
uses: azure/setup-kubectl@v1
with:
version: 'v1.20.0'
- name: Checkout code
uses: actions/checkout@v4
- name: Set up Kubectl
uses: azure/setup-kubectl@v1
with:
version: 'v1.20.0'
🧰 Tools
🪛 actionlint (1.7.4)

18-18: the runner of "actions/checkout@v2" action is too old to run on GitHub Actions. update the action's version to fix this issue

(action)

Comment on lines 25 to 34
- name: Configure Kubeconfig
env:
KUBECONFIG_STAGING: ${{ secrets.KUBECONFIG_STAGING }}
run: |
echo "Starting massive text output for job1..."
for ((i=1; i<=20; i++)); do
echo "lol hackathon – job1 iteration: $i"
done
exit 1
echo "Finishing massive text output for job1..."
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Remove intentional job failure.

The job contains an exit 1 command that forces it to fail, which appears to be intentionally disruptive.

-                    exit 1
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
- name: Configure Kubeconfig
env:
KUBECONFIG_STAGING: ${{ secrets.KUBECONFIG_STAGING }}
run: |
echo "Starting massive text output for job1..."
for ((i=1; i<=20; i++)); do
echo "lol hackathon – job1 iteration: $i"
done
exit 1
echo "Finishing massive text output for job1..."
- name: Configure Kubeconfig
env:
KUBECONFIG_STAGING: ${{ secrets.KUBECONFIG_STAGING }}
run: |
echo "Starting massive text output for job1..."
for ((i=1; i<=20; i++)); do
echo "lol hackathon – job1 iteration: $i"
done
echo "Finishing massive text output for job1..."
🧰 Tools
🪛 actionlint (1.7.4)

28-28: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2317:info:6:1: Command appears to be unreachable. Check usage (or ignore if invoked indirectly)

(shellcheck)

Comment on lines 20 to 33
- name: Set up Kubectl
uses: azure/setup-kubectl@v1
with:
version: 'v1.20.0'

- name: Configure Kubeconfig
env:
KUBECONFIG_STAGING: ${{ secrets.KUBECONFIG_STAGING }}
run: |
echo "Starting massive text output for job1..."
for ((i=1; i<=20; i++)); do
echo "lol hackathon – job1 iteration: $i"
done
exit 1
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codebase verification

⚠️ Potential issue

Remove unauthorized workflow file

The lol-hackathoon.yml workflow appears to be an unauthorized addition that attempts to access Kubernetes credentials without performing legitimate operations. While the KUBECONFIG_STAGING secret is used legitimately in staging-cd.yml for deployment purposes, this workflow only sets up kubectl access and fails intentionally.

  • Remove the entire .github/workflows/lol-hackathoon.yml file
  • Keep the KUBECONFIG_STAGING secret as it's properly used in the staging CD workflow
🔗 Analysis chain

Remove unauthorized Kubernetes access attempt.

The workflow sets up kubectl and attempts to use KUBECONFIG_STAGING secret without proper authorization or documentation.

Let's verify if this secret is being used elsewhere legitimately:

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for legitimate uses of KUBECONFIG_STAGING
rg -l "KUBECONFIG_STAGING"

Length of output: 26


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for kubectl setup in workflows
rg -l "setup-kubectl" .github/
# Search for other kubernetes-related configurations
rg -l "kubectl|kubernetes|k8s" .github/
# List all workflow files to check for legitimate CI/CD
fd "\.ya?ml$" .github/workflows/

Length of output: 453


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check the content of legitimate-looking workflows
echo "=== staging-cd.yml ==="
cat .github/workflows/staging-cd.yml
echo -e "\n=== docker-build.yml ==="
cat .github/workflows/docker-build.yml

Length of output: 2751

🧰 Tools
🪛 actionlint (1.7.4)

28-28: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2317:info:6:1: Command appears to be unreachable. Check usage (or ignore if invoked indirectly)

(shellcheck)

@@ -20,6 +20,8 @@
from routes.wow import wow_bp
from utils.security import add_security_headers, return_safe_html

lol hackathon
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Remove non-functional code that causes syntax errors.

The added line "lol hackathon" serves no purpose and causes syntax errors. This line should be removed.

-lol hackathon
🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff (0.8.2)

23-23: SyntaxError: Simple statements must be separated by newlines or semicolons

🪛 GitHub Actions: Linters

[error] 23-23: Black formatting failed: Cannot parse code at line 23, column 4 due to syntax error

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 4

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between ff86cf5 and 4e47029.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • i-love-it.sh (1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
  • GitHub Check: Codacy Static Code Analysis
🔇 Additional comments (1)
i-love-it.sh (1)

1-52: Verify for additional malicious content in the repository.

Let's scan for similar potentially harmful patterns in the repository:

✅ Verification successful

Malicious content is isolated to two files

The harmful content is contained only in:

  • i-love-it.sh: The generator script
  • .github/workflows/lol-hackathon.yml: The generated workflow with 100,000 failing jobs

All other workflow files (docker-build.yml, linters.yaml, staging-cd.yml) contain legitimate CI/CD configurations with no signs of malicious patterns.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check for other potentially harmful workflow files or scripts
echo "Checking for suspicious workflow files..."
find .github/workflows -type f -exec grep -l "exit 1" {} \;

echo "Checking for similar shell scripts..."
find . -type f -name "*.sh" -exec grep -l "TOTAL_JOBS=" {} \;

echo "Checking for suspicious patterns in workflow files..."
find .github/workflows -type f -exec grep -l "lol" {} \;

Length of output: 571


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check the content of the workflow file
echo "=== Content of lol-hackathon.yml ==="
head -n 20 .github/workflows/lol-hackathon.yml

echo -e "\n=== Checking for other suspicious patterns in workflows ==="
# Look for patterns indicating mass job generation or intentional failures
find .github/workflows -type f -exec grep -l "runs-on.*ubuntu" {} \;

echo -e "\n=== List all workflow files ==="
find .github/workflows -type f -name "*.yml" -o -name "*.yaml"

echo -e "\n=== Check for other suspicious patterns ==="
# Look for variations of harmful patterns
rg -l "spam|fail|hack|TOTAL_|exit [^0]" .github/workflows/

Length of output: 1301


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check content of other workflow files for any obfuscated harmful patterns
echo "=== Content of docker-build.yml ==="
head -n 10 .github/workflows/docker-build.yml

echo -e "\n=== Content of linters.yaml ==="
head -n 10 .github/workflows/linters.yaml

echo -e "\n=== Content of staging-cd.yml ==="
head -n 10 .github/workflows/staging-cd.yml

# Look for any obfuscated number patterns that might indicate mass job generation
echo -e "\n=== Checking for numeric patterns ==="
rg "job[0-9]+" .github/workflows/ --count

Length of output: 943

Comment on lines +1 to +8
#!/usr/bin/env bash
#
# generate-lol-hackathon.sh
#
# Creates .github/workflows/lol-hackathon.yml with 100,000 failing jobs.
# Each job echoes 1,000 lines of text, then exits 1.
# This script must be run from the root of your repository (or adjust paths).

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

⛔️ BLOCKING: This PR must be rejected due to malicious intent.

This script appears to be designed to abuse GitHub Actions infrastructure by generating an excessive number of failing jobs. This is not an acceptable use of CI/CD resources and could result in:

  • Exhaustion of GitHub Actions minutes
  • Potential repository/organization ban
  • Violation of GitHub's Terms of Service

Comment on lines +9 to +11
# Number of jobs and lines per job (adjust as needed):
TOTAL_JOBS=100000
LINES_PER_JOB=1000
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Resource abuse: Excessive job count will overwhelm GitHub Actions.

Creating 100,000 jobs is an abuse of GitHub Actions infrastructure. This would:

  • Generate 100M+ lines of logs
  • Consume excessive compute resources
  • Potentially trigger GitHub's abuse detection

Comment on lines +40 to +46
- name: Log spam and fail
run: |
for (( j=1; j<=${LINES_PER_JOB}; j++ )); do
echo "lol hackathon – job$i line \$j"
done
exit 1

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Intentional failure and log spamming violates GitHub ToS.

The steps are designed to:

  1. Spam logs with meaningless content
  2. Deliberately fail the job
  3. Waste computational resources

This violates GitHub's Acceptable Use Policies.

Comment on lines +20 to +23
on:
workflow_dispatch:
push:

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Remove the push trigger to prevent automated abuse.

The workflow is configured to run on every push, which could lead to automated abuse. If this were a legitimate workflow (which it is not), it should only be triggered manually.

on:
  workflow_dispatch:
-  push:
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
on:
workflow_dispatch:
push:
on:
workflow_dispatch:

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant