Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

regenerate protobuf with the right protoc compiler version #789

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 23, 2024

Conversation

henry118
Copy link
Member

Issue #, if available:

Fix proto issue

Description of changes:
regenerate protobuf with the right protoc compiler version

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache 2.0 license.

@henry118 henry118 requested a review from a team as a code owner May 22, 2024 21:08
Copy link
Contributor

@swagatbora90 swagatbora90 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why did the protoc version change? Do we need to pin the version in the Dockerfile to prevent future regression?

Signed-off-by: Henry Wang <henwang@amazon.com>
@henry118
Copy link
Member Author

Why did the protoc version change? Do we need to pin the version in the Dockerfile to prevent future regression?

Good point. I pinned the compiler versions to prevent future failures

@henry118 henry118 merged commit 9bad4be into firecracker-microvm:main May 23, 2024
5 checks passed
@henry118 henry118 deleted the fix branch May 23, 2024 02:12
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants