-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Host Filesystem Sharing #1180
Comments
With this feature, can the firecracker work with overlay-fs just like docker? |
We don't know yet. The next step here will be to research the existing options and their trade-offs. Basically, everything int he |
I think support kubernetes PV block is better... |
VirioFS has been merged into mainline. I think support this driver would solve the sharing problem |
I used configuration:
and got
|
hi @wenhuizhang Firstly, The configuration you posted seems to contain some Thanks! |
Is virtio-fs going to be supported? |
Hello @alexandru0-dev virtio-fs support is not currently on our roadmap as we answered on this comment. Thanks! |
@zulinx86 virtiofs would allow high performance for a shared filesystem with the host for when the host or multiple VMs. Also rust-vmm should now support virtio-fs if I'm not mistaken. I would be happy to discuss the topic. |
As an alternative, https://github.com/cloud-hypervisor/cloud-hypervisor is a rust-vmm-based lightweight hypervisor that has virtio-fs support. |
@paulbaumgart yeah in fact I was using that one for now but I was also interested in this project |
This feature is in high demand, and we formerly rejected the p9-based implementation for security concerns. With the advent of things like virtio-fs and other ideas of how to achieve this functionality, we will need to research our options and revisit the threat model impact.
Related issues: #889
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: