Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Sorting of PoSe score on masternode list by number #1483

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 23, 2024

Conversation

levoncrypto
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Sep 19, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes in this pull request modify the creation process of the PoSeScoreItem within the MasternodeList::updateDIP3List() function. Instead of initializing the PoSeScoreItem directly with a string representation of the nPoSePenalty, it is now created without an initial value and its data is set later using setData() with Qt::EditRole. This approach enhances data handling and integration with Qt's model-view architecture.

Changes

Files Change Summary
src/qt/masternodelist.cpp Modified PoSeScoreItem creation in MasternodeList::updateDIP3List() to use setData() for better data handling.

Possibly related issues

🐰 In the code we hop and play,
A score's true value finds its way.
With numbers sorted, clear and bright,
Our masternodes shine in the light!
Hooray for changes, let’s rejoice,
For data handling, we have a choice! 🎉


Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between e0c4238 and 6c5e293.

Files selected for processing (1)
  • src/qt/masternodelist.cpp (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (2)
src/qt/masternodelist.cpp (2)

217-218: LGTM!

The change to create the PoSeScoreItem without an initial value and set its data using setData() with Qt::EditRole looks good. This allows for more flexible data handling and better integration with Qt's model-view architecture.


217-218: No further comments needed.

Reviewing the PoSeScoreItem change in the context of the entire updateDIP3List() function, it looks good and does not introduce any issues or side effects to the overall logic of populating the masternode list table.


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    -- I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    -- Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    -- @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    -- @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    -- @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    -- @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    -- @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    -- @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@reubenyap
Copy link
Member

This is the proposed fix to #1482

@levonpetrosyan93 levonpetrosyan93 merged commit db219f3 into master Sep 23, 2024
7 checks passed
@levonpetrosyan93 levonpetrosyan93 deleted the sorting_masternode_list branch September 23, 2024 09:39
@justanwar
Copy link
Member

firo-qt_2024_09_23_02_12_16
Before

firo-qt_2024_09_23_02_10_41
After

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants