Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

remove(otel): removed go.mod file for middleware/otel #50

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Dec 6, 2024

Conversation

flc1125
Copy link
Owner

@flc1125 flc1125 commented Dec 6, 2024

for this reason: #48

plan: #49

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Updated the dependency management in the project to include new libraries related to OpenTelemetry and logging.
    • Removed an obsolete module definition file for the middleware package, indicating a cleanup of unnecessary dependencies.

@dosubot dosubot bot added the size:M This PR changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. label Dec 6, 2024
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 6, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes in this pull request involve updates to the go.mod file, which now includes additional dependencies related to OpenTelemetry and logging, and reorganizes existing dependencies into a consolidated block. Additionally, the middleware/otel/go.mod file has been deleted, indicating that the module and its dependencies are no longer required.

Changes

File Change Summary
go.mod - Added dependencies: go.opentelemetry.io/otel v1.32.0, go.opentelemetry.io/otel/sdk v1.32.0, go.opentelemetry.io/otel/trace v1.32.0.
- Added indirect dependencies: github.com/go-logr/logr v1.4.2, github.com/go-logr/stdr v1.2.2, github.com/google/uuid v1.6.0, go.opentelemetry.io/otel/metric v1.32.0.
middleware/otel/go.mod - Deleted the file, removing the module definition and its dependencies for github.com/flc1125/go-cron/v4/middleware/otel.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant Developer
    participant GoMod
    participant Middleware

    Developer->>GoMod: Update dependencies
    GoMod->>GoMod: Add OpenTelemetry and logging dependencies
    Developer->>Middleware: Remove unnecessary module
    Middleware-->>Developer: Module deleted
Loading

Poem

In the meadow, changes bloom,
Dependencies rise, dispelling gloom.
OpenTelemetry's light shines bright,
Logging tools, a joyous sight.
Old modules gone, a fresh new start,
In our code, we play our part! 🐇✨


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between ce26003 and 8bf4640.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (2)
  • go.sum is excluded by !**/*.sum
  • middleware/otel/go.sum is excluded by !**/*.sum
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • go.mod (1 hunks)
  • middleware/otel/go.mod (0 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
  • middleware/otel/go.mod
🔇 Additional comments (3)
go.mod (3)

Line range hint 1-21: Architectural Change: Consolidation of OpenTelemetry dependencies

The consolidation of OpenTelemetry dependencies from middleware/otel/go.mod into the main go.mod represents a significant architectural change. This change:

  1. Simplifies dependency management
  2. Ensures version consistency across the project
  3. May impact downstream modules that previously imported the middleware independently

Consider documenting this architectural change in:

  1. The project's changelog
  2. Update relevant documentation about middleware usage
  3. Add migration guides if this is a breaking change

14-18: Review indirect dependency versions

The new indirect dependencies (logr v1.4.2, stdr v1.2.2, uuid v1.6.0) appear to be the latest stable versions. However, verify if these specific versions are required by OpenTelemetry or if they can be managed by Go's dependency resolution.

✅ Verification successful

Let me check the actual usage of these dependencies in the codebase and their relationship with OpenTelemetry.


Let me check the OpenTelemetry dependency requirements more specifically.


Indirect dependencies are correctly aligned with OpenTelemetry requirements

The indirect dependencies are correctly versioned as they match the exact requirements of OpenTelemetry v1.32.0:

  • github.com/go-logr/logr v1.4.2 is directly required by OpenTelemetry
  • github.com/go-logr/stdr v1.2.2 is directly required by OpenTelemetry
  • github.com/google/uuid v1.6.0 is a transitive dependency brought in by the OpenTelemetry SDK

These versions should be maintained as they are to ensure compatibility with the OpenTelemetry implementation.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check if these versions are explicitly required by OpenTelemetry

# Search for version constraints in go.mod files
rg -l "github.com/go-logr/logr|github.com/go-logr/stdr|github.com/google/uuid" --type go

# Check latest versions
echo "Latest versions:"
for pkg in "github.com/go-logr/logr" "github.com/go-logr/stdr" "github.com/google/uuid"; do
  curl -s "https://proxy.golang.org/$pkg/@v/list" | tail -n 1
done

Length of output: 670


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check the content of logger.go to understand dependency usage
cat logger.go

# Check go.mod for OpenTelemetry version and its requirements
cat go.mod

# Check if these dependencies are required by OpenTelemetry
rg -p "require.*go.opentelemetry.io/otel" go.mod -A 10

Length of output: 3137


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Download and check OpenTelemetry's go.mod for its version requirements
curl -s "https://proxy.golang.org/go.opentelemetry.io/otel/@v/v1.32.0.mod"

# Check if there are any explicit version constraints in the codebase
rg "go-logr|stdr|uuid" -A 2 -B 2

Length of output: 3104


6-9: Verify OpenTelemetry version compatibility

The addition of OpenTelemetry packages (v1.32.0) alongside testify v1.10.0 needs version compatibility verification.

✅ Verification successful

Let me gather more information about the dependency relationships and usage in the codebase.


Let me try one more verification approach focusing on the actual OpenTelemetry usage patterns.


OpenTelemetry dependencies are properly aligned

The OpenTelemetry packages (v1.32.0) are being used consistently across the codebase with no security vulnerabilities reported. The consolidation of dependencies from middleware/otel to the main module maintains version consistency, and the presence of these packages in tracing-related files (middleware/otel/tracing.go and tracing_test.go) indicates proper usage.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for compatibility issues and latest versions

# Check if there are any known compatibility issues between these versions
gh api graphql -f query='
{
  securityVulnerabilities(first: 5, ecosystem: GO, package: "go.opentelemetry.io/otel") {
    nodes {
      advisory {
        summary
        severity
        publishedAt
      }
      vulnerableVersionRange
      firstPatchedVersion {
        identifier
      }
    }
  }
}'

# Check latest versions
echo "Latest versions:"
for pkg in "go.opentelemetry.io/otel" "go.opentelemetry.io/otel/sdk" "go.opentelemetry.io/otel/trace"; do
  curl -s "https://proxy.golang.org/$pkg/@v/list" | tail -n 1
done

Length of output: 993


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check for OpenTelemetry usage and version constraints
# Look for any version constraints or compatibility requirements in go files
rg -U "require.*opentelemetry" --type go

# Check for any existing OpenTelemetry initialization or configuration
ast-grep --pattern 'func $_($$$) {
  $$$
  otel.$$$
  $$$
}'

# Look for any migration guides or version notes in docs
fd -t f -e md | xargs rg -l "opentelemetry|otel" 

Length of output: 156


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for OpenTelemetry imports and usage
rg -l "go.opentelemetry.io/otel" 

# Check for any existing go.mod files to understand module structure
fd -t f "go.mod$"

# Look for specific OpenTelemetry package imports
rg "^import.*go.opentelemetry.io/otel" -A 3

Length of output: 200


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 6, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 96.56%. Comparing base (ce26003) to head (d7c68bd).
Report is 1 commits behind head on 4.x.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##              4.x      #50      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   97.00%   96.56%   -0.45%     
==========================================
  Files          13       14       +1     
  Lines         768      815      +47     
==========================================
+ Hits          745      787      +42     
- Misses         20       25       +5     
  Partials        3        3              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@flc1125 flc1125 merged commit d59aaec into 4.x Dec 6, 2024
9 of 10 checks passed
@flc1125 flc1125 deleted the remove-monorepo branch December 6, 2024 01:27
@flc1125 flc1125 added this to the v4.2.0 milestone Dec 6, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
size:M This PR changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant