Remove placeholder text

[noahtalerman]

Issue

Cerra #22278

Description

• Issue: It's unclear, at a glance, when I'm enforcing updates and when I'm not
• Solution: Remove placeholder text

Screenrecording of fix

https://www.loom.com/share/774b1f8180054ed69a0c6bdd53897acf

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 65.20%. Comparing base (8d664bd) to head (b062299).
Report is 6 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main   #22274   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   65.20%   65.20%           
=======================================
  Files        1496     1496           
  Lines      117239   117239           
  Branches     3512     3571   +59     
=======================================
  Hits        76447    76447           
+ Misses      33656    33655    -1     
- Partials     7136     7137    +1     

Flag	Coverage Δ
frontend	52.14% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[noahtalerman]

Thanks @iansltx! I didn't get a chance to QA this myself. Did you give it a quick check?

@sharon-fdm, assuming Ian helped QA, is it ok for me to merge this now? I'm not sure where we stand w/ 4.57 release.

[RachelElysia]

Remove unused code:

  const getMinimumVersionPlaceholder = (platform: ApplePlatform) => {
    switch (platform) {
      case "darwin":
        return "13.0.1";
      case "ios":
      case "ipados":
        return "17.5.1";
      default:
        return "";
    }
  };

[sharon-fdm]

@RachelElysia, can you please remind me which ticket this is for?
If this is not an unreleased bug, we can, of course, merge to main but not cherry-pick to the RC Branch.

cc @noahtalerman

[RachelElysia]

@sharon-fdm - I don't know if this has a ticket. It looks like @noahtalerman just saw a UI improvement (these placeholders are released) and wanted to snipe it real quick.

[sharon-fdm]

Ahhhhh... sounds good.
Then, once approved, feel free to merge to the main branch.
@noahtalerman, at this point, we only add critical things to the release. We could do an exception if there is a good reason though.

@RachelElysia

[iansltx]

IMO no exception here, as we can pick this up in 4.57.1, and 4.57.0 is frozen for smoke testing at this point.

[iansltx]

@noahtalerman I can QA, but will need a ticket so this doesn't get lost, as I still have some docs to write.

[iansltx]

(and also Rachel's review absolutely wins over mine, so there's a little extra work to do here)