Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Metadata leak in re-frisk #38

Closed
stoeckley opened this issue Jul 14, 2017 · 10 comments
Closed

Metadata leak in re-frisk #38

stoeckley opened this issue Jul 14, 2017 · 10 comments
Assignees
Labels
Milestone

Comments

@stoeckley
Copy link

Not sure if this should be put here, but re-frisk is possible the culprit for this metadata leak:

day8/re-frame#365 (comment)

Also, note the very large compile time introduced by re-frisk.

@flexsurfer
Copy link
Owner

yeah, thanks @astoeckley . it's because i'm using cljs.js https://github.com/flexsurfer/re-frisk-shell/blob/master/src/re_frisk_shell/core.cljs#L6, looks like it's better to do not include this by default

@flexsurfer flexsurfer self-assigned this Jul 14, 2017
@stoeckley
Copy link
Author

Thanks, do you know if this will be a quick fix? If not, I will remove re-frisk from my project until it is resolved.

@flexsurfer
Copy link
Owner

unfortunately it's not quick, so you can use 0.3.2 if you need re-frisk, or remove it

@stoeckley
Copy link
Author

Was 0.3.2 before you made a big change to cause this particular issue? Anything else that is notably different in 0.3.2?

@flexsurfer
Copy link
Owner

yes, 0.3.2 has the same functionality, but without this cljs runtime compiler

@stoeckley
Copy link
Author

Incidentally, perhaps the reason that my advanced compilation build with re-frisk takes 200 seconds is that somehow re-frisk is still entering the picture there, despite that the reframe template seems to be preventing that. cljs.js is not compatible with advanced optimizations.

@mike-thompson-day8
Copy link

We have stepped back to 0.3.2 also. This is a pretty nasty trap. Thanks for highlighting it @astoeckley

@flexsurfer
Copy link
Owner

@mike-thompson-day8 sorry for that, i'm working only with remote version, so i haven't seen this problem, and no one report the problem long time, i will fix this asap this weekend, i'm reworking UI atm, using re-com, but faced performance issues in safari, and bug with splitter, could you give advice should i continue with re-com for re-frisk or better leave old UI for now? i know you don't recommend it for safari , thanks

@mike-thompson-day8
Copy link

I think it may be safest to stick with the old UI.

re-com works really well for us, but we're on Chrome.

mbertheau added a commit to mbertheau/koreansrs that referenced this issue Jul 25, 2017
Among other things:

Use older re-frisk for smaller code

flexsurfer/re-frisk#38
@flexsurfer flexsurfer added bug and removed enhancement labels Sep 2, 2017
@flexsurfer flexsurfer added this to the 0.5.0 milestone Sep 2, 2017
@flexsurfer
Copy link
Owner

fixed in 0.5.0

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants