Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix rpy and agda #129

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

fix rpy and agda #129

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

zwrawr
Copy link
Contributor

@zwrawr zwrawr commented Oct 22, 2021

fixes tests failing in #128

Agda #116

This has a similar syntax to haskell and shares the same comments ---comment and {- multiline -} , for some reason it's block comment was set up as /* multiline */. this makes the tests pass.
https://agda.readthedocs.io/en/latest/language/lexical-structure.html#comments
https://wiki.portal.chalmers.se/agda/ReferenceManual/Comments#:~:text=Agda%20has%20both%20single%2Dline,delimited%20by%20%7B%2D%20and%20%2D%7D%20.

Ren'py #119

comment heading here https://www.renpy.org/doc/html/language_basics.html
SDL heading here https://www.renpy.org/doc/html/other.html

The ren py test was just set up wrong

        """
          \"""
          block comment
          \"""
          # a
          $ source.code() #comment
          show code #comment
          # comment
          '''
          another block comment
          '''
        """

The above has two source lines $ source.code() #comment and show code #comment not one. And it has 4 single line comments in

@flosse
Copy link
Owner

flosse commented Sep 20, 2023

I'm sorry, there are conflicts now, would you mind to solve them?

@flosse
Copy link
Owner

flosse commented Sep 20, 2023

Thanks to your explanation I just fixed it myself.
Thank you!

@flosse flosse closed this Sep 20, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants