-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.6k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
input_chunk: info level instead of debug for chunk removal msg #6719
Conversation
src/flb_input_chunk.c
Outdated
flb_debug("[input chunk] remove route of chunk %s with size %ld bytes to output plugin %s " | ||
"to place the incoming data with size %ld bytes", flb_input_chunk_get_name(old_ic), | ||
old_ic_bytes, o_ins->name, chunk_size); | ||
flb_info("[input chunk] remove route of chunk %s with size %zd bytes to output plugin %s " |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
the format specifiers here were wrong according to my understanding.
old_ic_bytes
is ssize_t
which should use %zd
for signed type, and then the others are size_t
which is unsigned and needs %zu
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
In terms of changing from debug => info, my thinking was that the user should get a clear message when chunks are being deleted.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
if I am not wrong the debug message is a "hint" to tell the user/debugger the chunk "aims to be removed", actually that routine is trying to find a candidate since the queue is full, then the logic depends on routes/mask, at that level of the message is not really removed.
cc: @leonardo-albertovich @pwhelan -> I think you both were involved in those changes, can you comment ?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ok, in that case then I think the debug message on line 624 should be info and should be updated since that is where the deletion truly happens? And then here the debug message should say something like "Attempt to remove".
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
flb_task_destroy also destroys the chunk backing the task. You would need to change the call to flb_debug on both lines 616 and 624.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ack. I will update to that.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Signed-off-by: Wesley Pettit <wppttt@amazon.com>
6ab1e6f
to
f95ab95
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
…t#6719) Signed-off-by: Wesley Pettit <wppttt@amazon.com> Signed-off-by: root <root@sumit-acs.novalocal>
…t#6719) Signed-off-by: Wesley Pettit <wppttt@amazon.com>
…t#6719) Signed-off-by: Wesley Pettit <wppttt@amazon.com>
…t#6719) Signed-off-by: Wesley Pettit <wppttt@amazon.com>
…t#6719) Signed-off-by: Wesley Pettit <wppttt@amazon.com>
…t#6719) Signed-off-by: Wesley Pettit <wppttt@amazon.com>
…t#6719) Signed-off-by: Wesley Pettit <wppttt@amazon.com>
…t#6719) Signed-off-by: Wesley Pettit <wppttt@amazon.com>
Signed-off-by: Wesley Pettit wppttt@amazon.com
Enter
[N/A]
in the box, if an item is not applicable to your change.Testing
Before we can approve your change; please submit the following in a comment:
If this is a change to packaging of containers or native binaries then please confirm it works for all targets.
Documentation
Backporting
Fluent Bit is licensed under Apache 2.0, by submitting this pull request I understand that this code will be released under the terms of that license.