Skip to content

Conversation

@matheuscscp
Copy link
Member

@matheuscscp matheuscscp commented Jan 7, 2026

@matheuscscp matheuscscp added area/helm Helm related issues and pull requests dependencies Pull requests that update a dependency labels Jan 7, 2026
Signed-off-by: Matheus Pimenta <matheuscscp@gmail.com>
@matheuscscp matheuscscp force-pushed the helm4 branch 2 times, most recently from c9de435 to a0ce7e2 Compare January 7, 2026 16:02
Signed-off-by: Matheus Pimenta <matheuscscp@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Matheus Pimenta <matheuscscp@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Matheus Pimenta <matheuscscp@gmail.com>
@matheuscscp
Copy link
Member Author

I have tested this:

  • In a cluster with 18 HelmReleases from OCIRepository charts.
  • With a simple HelmRelease that has .spec.chart pointing to a GitRepository.
  • With a HelmRelease for kube-prometheus-stack OCI chart version 69.8.2 vendored into a GitRepository (also using .spec.chart). In this case all the subcharts were also vendored into the GitRepository.
  • With a HelmRelease for kube-prometheus-stack using the upstream HTTPS repo, chart version 80.13.2.
  • With a HelmRelease for kube-prometheus-stack vendored into a GitRepository from the upstream Git repository. In this case the subcharts were pulled by source-controller.

I will still test this with a HelmRepository type oci and TLS.

Signed-off-by: Matheus Pimenta <matheuscscp@gmail.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

area/helm Helm related issues and pull requests dependencies Pull requests that update a dependency

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants