Add support for I18n keyword arguments #15
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This pull request adds support for keyword arguments to the I18n
tandlfunctions.Keyword arguments have been possible since ruby 3 and are used in the official documentation: https://guides.rubyonrails.org/i18n.html
Example code that causes issues in practice if I would use the
tfunction:https://github.com/dodona-edu/dodona/pull/4498/files#diff-0766148eceb8a6184a8e7a699244d5530c9c7356f76c836dbfa26d2ebae6266dR10
With the corresponding test:
https://github.com/dodona-edu/dodona/pull/4498/files#diff-dea6d8d9142890f588e2d37054543b932f1853e0936fbe34e0beedabd73bdeaeR11