Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: update "sfdx" examples in docs to their "sf" equivalents #5435

Conversation

CristiCanizales
Copy link
Contributor

What does this PR do?

What issues does this PR fix or reference?

@W-15052113@

@CristiCanizales CristiCanizales requested a review from a team as a code owner February 16, 2024 19:37
@daphne-sfdc daphne-sfdc changed the title Revert "Revert "fix: update "sfdx" examples in docs to their "sf" equivalents"" fix: update "sfdx" examples in docs to their "sf" equivalents Mar 28, 2024
@@ -10,9 +10,9 @@ To set up LWC Local Development, install the server, enable and authorize a Dev
Run this command from a command-line interface.

```
sfdx plugins:install @salesforce/lwc-dev-server
sf plugins install @salesforce/lwc-dev-server
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@daphne-sfdc should local dev also be using sf?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@AnanyaJha Yes, the change to sf here is correct. The command sf plugins install is a general command used to install any plugin - it doesn't matter that the plugin being installed is local dev server.

@daphne-sfdc daphne-sfdc merged commit 753c97a into develop Mar 28, 2024
12 checks passed
@daphne-sfdc daphne-sfdc deleted the revert-5434-revert-5432-jshackell-update-sfdx-cli-examples-to-sf branch March 28, 2024 17:18
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants