You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Regarding to stdlib_stats_distribution_PRNG module, I am not sure whether it should be in stats_distribution package. GSL has a separate random numbers package in addition to random distributions and statistics.
Should stdlib_stats_distribution_PRNG become a submodule of stdlib_stats_distribution?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I though a bit about yesterday while reviewing #272. However, there are other PRs proposing similar functions. Therefore I decided to review first these other PRs, before taking a decision ;) I am a bit puzzled because these modules provide procedures related to the distributions (pdf, cdf) and to randomness (rnd). I wonder if it would not be better to generate 2 different modules (distribution vs random)
I think PRNG should be in a separate random module as GSL does. PRNG generates random integer numbers with defined kind which could be used for applications way beyond of random distributions. Furthermore, PRNG may contain parallel version of generators in the future.
@Jim-215-Fisher in #538 (comment)
Should
stdlib_stats_distribution_PRNG
become a submodule ofstdlib_stats_distribution
?The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: