Skip to content

Conversation

grandizzy
Copy link
Collaborator

@grandizzy grandizzy commented Aug 27, 2025

Motivation

Solution

  • in place fix, needs a broader refactoring to reflect same code is used by etherscan-like verifiers and more tests for non-etherscan supported verifiers
  • consider backport to v1.3.3

PR Checklist

  • Added Tests
  • Added Documentation
  • Breaking changes

@grandizzy grandizzy marked this pull request as ready for review August 27, 2025 15:01
@grandizzy grandizzy marked this pull request as draft August 27, 2025 16:45
@grandizzy grandizzy marked this pull request as ready for review September 8, 2025 16:12
@grandizzy grandizzy requested a review from zerosnacks September 8, 2025 16:12
Copy link
Member

@zerosnacks zerosnacks left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Makes sense 👍

@grandizzy grandizzy merged commit f60a1d8 into foundry-rs:master Sep 9, 2025
23 checks passed
@grandizzy grandizzy deleted the issue-11430 branch September 9, 2025 12:19
@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this to Done in Foundry Sep 9, 2025
MerkleBoy pushed a commit to MerkleBoy/foundry that referenced this pull request Sep 17, 2025
…ains (foundry-rs#11442)

* fix(forge): check if supported chain in verifier client

* Apply suggestions from code review

* heck if verifier url passed if not etherscan

* Tests

---------

Co-authored-by: zerosnacks <95942363+zerosnacks@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
Status: Done
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

bug(forge verify-contract): Etherscan API URL Error when using blockscout
2 participants