Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add -Lv/--line-verbose mode to rdump #102

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Jan 4, 2024
Merged

Conversation

yunzheng
Copy link
Member

@yunzheng yunzheng commented Jan 4, 2024

This adds a verbose option to the LineWriter adapter which also prints the field type.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 4, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (58d5915) 80.12% compared to head (7e1c360) 80.20%.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #102      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   80.12%   80.20%   +0.08%     
==========================================
  Files          33       33              
  Lines        3119     3132      +13     
==========================================
+ Hits         2499     2512      +13     
  Misses        620      620              
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 80.20% <100.00%> (+0.08%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

This adds a verbose option to the LineWriter adapter which also prints
the field type.
@yunzheng yunzheng force-pushed the feature/line-verbose-rdump branch from cf07f2f to eece7b1 Compare January 4, 2024 15:48
@yunzheng yunzheng requested a review from Schamper January 4, 2024 21:51
@yunzheng yunzheng requested a review from Schamper January 4, 2024 22:48
@yunzheng yunzheng merged commit 9670a38 into main Jan 4, 2024
32 checks passed
@yunzheng yunzheng deleted the feature/line-verbose-rdump branch January 4, 2024 23:22
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants