Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat(core): handle local modules without __init__.py #285

Merged

Conversation

mkniewallner
Copy link
Collaborator

PR Checklist

  • A description of the changes is added to the description of this PR.
  • If there is a related issue, make sure it is linked to this PR.
  • If you've fixed a bug or added code that should be tested, add tests!
  • Documentation in docs is updated

Description of changes

Since PEP 420, it is not required for Python modules to have an __init__.py to be considered a Python module.
We also today only consider directories and not Python files.

This PR handles this case by relaxing _get_local_modules method to account for 2 things:

  • Directories that don't contain any __init__.py, by checking for any Python file
  • Files that are Python files (end up with .py extension)

Tests have been updated to reflect what this implies for projects using an src directory structure.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 29, 2023

Codecov Report

❗ No coverage uploaded for pull request base (main@3c61806). Click here to learn what that means.
The diff coverage is 100.0%.

❗ Current head eeda478 differs from pull request most recent head f7cc6ca. Consider uploading reports for the commit f7cc6ca to get more accurate results

@@          Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #285   +/-   ##
======================================
  Coverage        ?   95.6%           
======================================
  Files           ?      29           
  Lines           ?     928           
  Branches        ?     186           
======================================
  Hits            ?     888           
  Misses          ?      27           
  Partials        ?      13           
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
deptry/core.py 98.0% <100.0%> (ø)

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

@mkniewallner mkniewallner force-pushed the feat/handle-local-modules-without-init branch from 9461120 to eeda478 Compare January 29, 2023 15:28
@mkniewallner mkniewallner marked this pull request as ready for review January 29, 2023 15:31
@mkniewallner mkniewallner requested a review from fpgmaas January 29, 2023 15:35
@mkniewallner mkniewallner force-pushed the feat/handle-local-modules-without-init branch from 4ea7cdd to f7cc6ca Compare April 23, 2023 10:03
@mkniewallner mkniewallner merged commit 2471494 into fpgmaas:main Apr 23, 2023
@mkniewallner mkniewallner deleted the feat/handle-local-modules-without-init branch April 23, 2023 10:05
@mkniewallner mkniewallner mentioned this pull request May 5, 2023
@mkniewallner mkniewallner added this to the 0.9 milestone May 5, 2023
@mkniewallner mkniewallner added the breaking Change that introduces a breaking change label May 9, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
breaking Change that introduces a breaking change
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants